Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 73 areas in 2020, at 3.2 per 1,000 inhabitants. Wałbrzyski had the lowest, at -8.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -3.6 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -3.3 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest3.2Gdański
Lowest-8.5Wałbrzyski
Median-3.673 areas
Poland-3.3History

Top 40 areas, 2020

Gdański: 3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański3.2Poznański: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański2.3Nowosądecki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki0.9Warszawski wschodni: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni0.1Miasto Kraków: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków-0.1Rzeszowski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski-0.1Chojnicki: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki-0.3Krakowski: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski-0.3Leszczyński: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-0.5Warszawski zachodni: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni-0.6Miasto Warszawa: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa-0.8Nowotarski: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.8Miasto Wrocław: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław-1Wrocławski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski-1Miasto Poznań: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-1.5Tyski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski-1.5Białostocki: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-1.6Starogardzki: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki-1.7Trójmiejski: -2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski-2.1Świecki: -2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki-2.3Pilski: -2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski-2.4Lubelski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-2.5Słupski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski-2.5Tarnowski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-2.5Siedlecki: -2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki-2.7Tarnobrzeski: -2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-2.7Kaliski: -2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-2.8Koniński: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-2.9Ostrołęcki: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki-2.9Bydgosko-toruński: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-3.1Olsztyński: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-3.1Krośnieński: -3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-3.2Bielski: -3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski-3.3Ełcki: -3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki-3.3Grudziądzki: -3.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-3.4Rybnicki: -3.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-3.5Szczeciński: -3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-3.6Elbląski: -3.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-3.8Legnicko-głogowski: -3.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-3.9Zielonogórski: -4 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-4Gdański: 3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański3.2Poznański: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański2.3Nowosądecki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki0.9Warszawski wschodni: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni0.1Miasto Kraków: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków-0.1Rzeszowski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski-0.1Chojnicki: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki-0.3Krakowski: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski-0.3Leszczyński: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński-0.5Warszawski zachodni: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni-0.6Miasto Warszawa: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa-0.8Nowotarski: -0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski-0.8Miasto Wrocław: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław-1Wrocławski: -1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski-1Miasto Poznań: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-1.5Tyski: -1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski-1.5Białostocki: -1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-1.6Starogardzki: -1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki-1.7Trójmiejski: -2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski-2.1Świecki: -2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki-2.3Pilski: -2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski-2.4Lubelski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-2.5Słupski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski-2.5Tarnowski: -2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski-2.5Siedlecki: -2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki-2.7Tarnobrzeski: -2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski-2.7Kaliski: -2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-2.8Koniński: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-2.9Ostrołęcki: -2.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki-2.9Bydgosko-toruński: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-3.1Olsztyński: -3.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-3.1Krośnieński: -3.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-3.2Bielski: -3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski-3.3Ełcki: -3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki-3.3Grudziądzki: -3.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-3.4Rybnicki: -3.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-3.5Szczeciński: -3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-3.6Elbląski: -3.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-3.8Legnicko-głogowski: -3.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-3.9Zielonogórski: -4 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-4
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2020
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2019
1Gdański Series break3.2-2.2 pts
2Poznański Series break2.3-1.4 pts
3Nowosądecki Series break0.9-2.4 pts
4Warszawski wschodni Series break0.1-1.9 pts
5Miasto Kraków Series break-0.1-2.1 pts
5Rzeszowski Series break-0.1-2.2 pts
7Chojnicki Series break-0.3-2.6 pts
7Krakowski Series break-0.3-1.7 pts
9Leszczyński Series break-0.5-1.9 pts
10Warszawski zachodni Series break-0.6-1.7 pts
11Miasto Warszawa Series break-0.8-2.1 pts
11Nowotarski Series break-0.8-2.4 pts
13Miasto Wrocław Series break-1-1.9 pts
13Wrocławski Series break-1-2.1 pts
15Miasto Poznań Series break-1.5-2.1 pts
15Tyski Series break-1.5-2.1 pts
17Białostocki Series break-1.6-2.1 pts
18Starogardzki Series break-1.7-2.2 pts
19Trójmiejski Series break-2.1-2 pts
20Świecki Series break-2.3-2.2 pts
21Pilski Series break-2.4-2.2 pts
22Lubelski Series break-2.5-2.6 pts
22Słupski Series break-2.5-1.9 pts
22Tarnowski Series break-2.5-2.5 pts
25Siedlecki Series break-2.7-3 pts
25Tarnobrzeski Series break-2.7-2.7 pts
27Kaliski Series break-2.8-2.4 pts
28Koniński Series break-2.9-2.9 pts
28Ostrołęcki Series break-2.9-2.8 pts
30Bydgosko-toruński Series break-3.1-2.2 pts
30Olsztyński Series break-3.1-1.6 pts
32Krośnieński Series break-3.2-2.3 pts
33Bielski Series break-3.3-2.5 pts
33Ełcki Series break-3.3-1.9 pts
35Grudziądzki Series break-3.4-2.5 pts
36Rybnicki Series break-3.5-2.4 pts
37Szczeciński Series break-3.6-2.2 pts
38Elbląski Series break-3.8-2.4 pts
39Legnicko-głogowski Series break-3.9-2.4 pts
40Zielonogórski Series break-4-1.9 pts
40Żyrardowski Series break-4-2.6 pts
42Gorzowski Series break-4.1-2.2 pts
42Inowrocławski Series break-4.1-2.4 pts
42Przemyski Series break-4.1-3.3 pts
45Ciechanowski Series break-4.2-2.7 pts
46Gliwicki Series break-4.3-2.1 pts
46Oświęcimski Series break-4.3-2.7 pts
48Radomski Series break-4.4-2.7 pts
49Opolski Series break-4.5-3 pts
49Suwalski Series break-4.5-3.4 pts
51Koszaliński Series break-4.6-2.7 pts
52Bialski Series break-4.7-2.9 pts
52Miasto Szczecin Series break-4.7-2 pts
54Puławski Series break-4.9-2.9 pts
54Sieradzki Series break-4.9-2.4 pts
56Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Series break-5.2-1.9 pts
57Płocki Series break-5.5-3.6 pts
58Łomżyński Series break-5.7-2.8 pts
58Piotrkowski Series break-5.7-3.1 pts
58Włocławski Series break-5.7-2.5 pts
61Bytomski Series break-5.8-3 pts
62Łódzki Series break-5.9-2.8 pts
62Skierniewicki Series break-5.9-2.4 pts
64Katowicki Series break-6-2.7 pts
65Nyski Series break-6.3-2.6 pts
66Chełmsko-zamojski Series break-6.5-2.8 pts
66Kielecki Series break-6.5-3.2 pts
68Częstochowski Series break-6.7-2.4 pts
69Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Series break-6.8-2.9 pts
70Jeleniogórski Series break-6.9-2.2 pts
71Sosnowiecki Series break-7.7-2.5 pts
72Miasto Łódź Series break-7.8-2.2 pts
73Wałbrzyski Series break-8.5-2.6 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2020,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2020
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2020.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 3.2 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Wałbrzyski, with -8.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings