Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 73 areas in 2015, at 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -6.3 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -0.7 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest5.6Gdański
Lowest-6.3Miasto Łódź
Median-0.673 areas
Poland-0.7History

Top 40 areas, 2015

Gdański: 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.6Poznański: 4.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.3Nowosądecki: 3.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.5Warszawski zachodni: 2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2.2Leszczyński: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.1Warszawski wschodni: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.1Chojnicki: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2Tyski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski1.8Nowotarski: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.3Krakowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.2Rzeszowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.2Miasto Warszawa: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa0.8Siedlecki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.7Starogardzki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki0.7Miasto Kraków: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.6Wrocławski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski0.6Słupski: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski0.5Świecki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.5Ostrołęcki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.3Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Tarnowski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski0.2Ełcki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.1Pilski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.1Bielski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0Tarnobrzeski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0Bydgosko-toruński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-0.1Koniński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-0.1Białostocki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-0.2Kaliski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-0.2Miasto Poznań: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-0.3Rybnicki: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-0.3Legnicko-głogowski: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.4Szczeciński: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-0.4Gorzowski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.5Grudziądzki: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-0.5Inowrocławski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.5Elbląski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.6Krośnieński: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-0.6Oświęcimski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-0.6Suwalski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSuwalski-0.6Gdański: 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.6Poznański: 4.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.3Nowosądecki: 3.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.5Warszawski zachodni: 2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2.2Leszczyński: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.1Warszawski wschodni: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.1Chojnicki: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2Tyski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski1.8Nowotarski: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.3Krakowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.2Rzeszowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.2Miasto Warszawa: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa0.8Siedlecki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.7Starogardzki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki0.7Miasto Kraków: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.6Wrocławski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski0.6Słupski: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski0.5Świecki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.5Ostrołęcki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.3Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Tarnowski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski0.2Ełcki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.1Pilski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.1Bielski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0Tarnobrzeski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0Bydgosko-toruński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-0.1Koniński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński-0.1Białostocki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-0.2Kaliski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski-0.2Miasto Poznań: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-0.3Rybnicki: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki-0.3Legnicko-głogowski: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.4Szczeciński: -0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński-0.4Gorzowski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.5Grudziądzki: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-0.5Inowrocławski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.5Elbląski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.6Krośnieński: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-0.6Oświęcimski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-0.6Suwalski: -0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsSuwalski-0.6
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2015
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2014
1Gdański5.6-0.1 pts
2Poznański4.3+0.2 pts
3Nowosądecki3.5-0.2 pts
4Warszawski zachodni2.2+0.3 pts
5Leszczyński2.1-0.6 pts
5Warszawski wschodni2.1-0.5 pts
7Chojnicki2-0.8 pts
8Tyski1.8-0.6 pts
9Nowotarski1.3-0.6 pts
10Krakowski1.2-0.6 pts
10Rzeszowski1.2-0.9 pts
12Miasto Warszawa0.8-0.1 pts
13Siedlecki0.7-0.3 pts
13Starogardzki0.7-1 pts
15Miasto Kraków0.60 pts
15Wrocławski0.6-0.8 pts
17Słupski0.5-0.8 pts
17Świecki0.5-1.1 pts
19Ostrołęcki0.3-0.5 pts
20Lubelski0.2+0.2 pts
20Tarnowski0.2-0.8 pts
22Ełcki0.1-0.6 pts
22Pilski0.1-0.8 pts
24Bielski0-0.8 pts
24Tarnobrzeski0-0.2 pts
26Bydgosko-toruński-0.1-0.3 pts
26Koniński-0.1-1.3 pts
28Białostocki-0.2-0.4 pts
28Kaliski-0.2-1.2 pts
30Miasto Poznań-0.3-0.5 pts
30Rybnicki-0.3-1.2 pts
32Legnicko-głogowski-0.4-0.8 pts
32Szczeciński-0.4-0.7 pts
34Gorzowski-0.5-0.9 pts
34Grudziądzki-0.5-1.4 pts
34Inowrocławski-0.5-0.3 pts
37Elbląski-0.6-1 pts
37Krośnieński-0.6-1.2 pts
37Oświęcimski-0.6-0.5 pts
37Suwalski-0.6-0.1 pts
37Trójmiejski-0.6-0.1 pts
37Żyrardowski-0.6+0.1 pts
43Miasto Wrocław-0.7-0.8 pts
43Olsztyński-0.7-1.5 pts
45Przemyski-0.9-0.6 pts
45Zielonogórski-0.9-0.9 pts
47Bialski-1-0.4 pts
48Ciechanowski-1.2-0.1 pts
49Koszaliński-1.3-0.9 pts
50Gliwicki-1.4-0.4 pts
50Opolski-1.4-0.7 pts
50Radomski-1.4-0.6 pts
50Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-1.4-0.9 pts
54Płocki-1.6-0.4 pts
55Miasto Szczecin-2.2-0.8 pts
55Puławski-2.2-1 pts
57Piotrkowski-2.4-1.2 pts
58Kielecki-2.5-0.8 pts
59Łódzki-2.6-0.2 pts
59Sieradzki-2.6-0.8 pts
59Włocławski-2.6-0.7 pts
62Bytomski-2.9-1.1 pts
62Chełmsko-zamojski-2.9-0.5 pts
62Skierniewicki-2.9-0.9 pts
65Katowicki-3.1-0.9 pts
65Łomżyński-3.1-1.1 pts
67Jeleniogórski-3.2-0.7 pts
68Nyski-3.7-1.5 pts
69Częstochowski-3.8-0.7 pts
70Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-4-0.8 pts
71Sosnowiecki-4.5-0.8 pts
72Wałbrzyski-4.9-1.3 pts
73Miasto Łódź-6.3-0.8 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2015,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2015
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2015.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Miasto Łódź, with -6.3 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings