Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 73 areas in 2014, at 5.7 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -5.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was 0 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest5.7Gdański
Lowest-5.5Miasto Łódź
Median0.273 areas
Poland0History

Top 40 areas, 2014

Gdański: 5.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.7Poznański: 4.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.1Nowosądecki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.7Chojnicki: 2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2.8Leszczyński: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.7Warszawski wschodni: 2.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.6Tyski: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2.4Rzeszowski: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.1Nowotarski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.9Warszawski zachodni: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni1.9Krakowski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.8Starogardzki: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.7Świecki: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki1.6Wrocławski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.4Słupski: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1.3Koniński: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński1.2Kaliski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski1Siedlecki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki1Tarnowski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1Grudziądzki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.9Miasto Warszawa: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa0.9Pilski: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.9Rybnicki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.9Bielski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.8Olsztyński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński0.8Ostrołęcki: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.8Ełcki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.7Krośnieński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.6Miasto Kraków: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.6Elbląski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski0.4Gorzowski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.4Legnicko-głogowski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski0.4Szczeciński: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.3Białostocki: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.2Bydgosko-toruński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.2Miasto Poznań: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań0.2Tarnobrzeski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.2Miasto Wrocław: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław0.1Lubelski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0Zielonogórski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski0Gdański: 5.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.7Poznański: 4.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.1Nowosądecki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.7Chojnicki: 2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2.8Leszczyński: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.7Warszawski wschodni: 2.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.6Tyski: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2.4Rzeszowski: 2.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.1Nowotarski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.9Warszawski zachodni: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni1.9Krakowski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.8Starogardzki: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.7Świecki: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki1.6Wrocławski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.4Słupski: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1.3Koniński: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński1.2Kaliski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski1Siedlecki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki1Tarnowski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1Grudziądzki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.9Miasto Warszawa: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa0.9Pilski: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.9Rybnicki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.9Bielski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.8Olsztyński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński0.8Ostrołęcki: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.8Ełcki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.7Krośnieński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.6Miasto Kraków: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.6Elbląski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski0.4Gorzowski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.4Legnicko-głogowski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski0.4Szczeciński: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.3Białostocki: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.2Bydgosko-toruński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.2Miasto Poznań: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań0.2Tarnobrzeski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.2Miasto Wrocław: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław0.1Lubelski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0Zielonogórski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski0
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2014
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2013
1Gdański5.7+0.1 pts
2Poznański4.1+0.5 pts
3Nowosądecki3.7+0.1 pts
4Chojnicki2.8+0.1 pts
5Leszczyński2.7+0.4 pts
6Warszawski wschodni2.6n/a
7Tyski2.40 pts
8Rzeszowski2.1+0.2 pts
9Nowotarski1.9+0.1 pts
9Warszawski zachodni1.9n/a
11Krakowski1.8+0.4 pts
12Starogardzki1.7+0.4 pts
13Świecki1.6+0.3 pts
14Wrocławski1.4+0.6 pts
15Słupski1.3+0.2 pts
16Koniński1.2+0.5 pts
17Kaliski1+0.7 pts
17Siedlecki1+0.6 pts
17Tarnowski10 pts
20Grudziądzki0.9+0.8 pts
20Miasto Warszawa0.9+1.1 pts
20Pilski0.9+0.1 pts
20Rybnicki0.9+0.6 pts
24Bielski0.8+0.2 pts
24Olsztyński0.8+1.3 pts
24Ostrołęcki0.8+0.1 pts
27Ełcki0.7+0.6 pts
28Krośnieński0.6-0.2 pts
28Miasto Kraków0.6+0.3 pts
30Elbląski0.4+0.5 pts
30Gorzowski0.4+0.3 pts
30Legnicko-głogowski0.4+0.7 pts
33Szczeciński0.3+0.2 pts
34Białostocki0.2+0.4 pts
34Bydgosko-toruński0.2+0.5 pts
34Miasto Poznań0.2+0.4 pts
34Tarnobrzeski0.2-0.2 pts
38Miasto Wrocław0.1+0.8 pts
39Lubelski0+0.1 pts
39Zielonogórski0+0.5 pts
41Oświęcimski-0.1+0.1 pts
42Inowrocławski-0.2-0.1 pts
43Przemyski-0.3-0.2 pts
44Koszaliński-0.4+0.4 pts
45Suwalski-0.5+0.5 pts
45Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-0.5+0.6 pts
45Trójmiejski-0.5+0.4 pts
48Bialski-0.6+0.9 pts
49Opolski-0.7+0.8 pts
49Żyrardowski-0.7n/a
51Radomski-0.8+0.3 pts
52Gliwicki-10 pts
53Ciechanowski-1.1+0.4 pts
54Piotrkowski-1.2+0.7 pts
54Płocki-1.2-0.3 pts
54Puławski-1.2+0.5 pts
57Miasto Szczecin-1.4+0.8 pts
58Kielecki-1.7+0.4 pts
59Bytomski-1.8-0.1 pts
59Sieradzki-1.8+0.2 pts
61Włocławski-1.9-0.1 pts
62Łomżyński-2+0.9 pts
62Skierniewicki-2+0.6 pts
64Katowicki-2.2+0.5 pts
64Nyski-2.2+0.9 pts
66Chełmsko-zamojski-2.4+0.3 pts
66Łódzki-2.4+0.8 pts
68Jeleniogórski-2.5+0.7 pts
69Częstochowski-3.1+0.1 pts
70Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-3.2+0.6 pts
71Wałbrzyski-3.6+0.6 pts
72Sosnowiecki-3.7+0.4 pts
73Miasto Łódź-5.5+1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2014,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2014
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2014.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 5.7 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Miasto Łódź, with -5.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2014.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings