Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 73 areas in 2017, at 6.9 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -5.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was 0 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was 0 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest6.9Gdański
Lowest-5.5Miasto Łódź
Median073 areas
Poland0History

Top 40 areas, 2017

Gdański: 6.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański6.9Poznański: 5.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański5.3Nowosądecki: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki4.2Chojnicki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki3.7Rzeszowski: 2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.8Leszczyński: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.7Nowotarski: 2.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski2.6Warszawski wschodni: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.4Krakowski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski2Miasto Kraków: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków2Tyski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2Warszawski zachodni: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2Starogardzki: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.7Wrocławski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.6Miasto Poznań: 1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań1.5Miasto Warszawa: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa1.3Pilski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski1.2Siedlecki: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki1.2Tarnowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1.2Białostocki: 1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki1.1Ostrołęcki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki1Słupski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1Tarnobrzeski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski1Koniński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.8Świecki: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.8Kaliski: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.7Rybnicki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.7Grudziądzki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.5Krośnieński: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.5Miasto Wrocław: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław0.5Bydgosko-toruński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.2Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Olsztyński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński0.2Bielski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.1Gorzowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.1Trójmiejski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.1Ełcki: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0Przemyski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsPrzemyski0Elbląski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.1Inowrocławski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.1Gdański: 6.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański6.9Poznański: 5.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański5.3Nowosądecki: 4.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki4.2Chojnicki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki3.7Rzeszowski: 2.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.8Leszczyński: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.7Nowotarski: 2.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski2.6Warszawski wschodni: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni2.4Krakowski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski2Miasto Kraków: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków2Tyski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2Warszawski zachodni: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2Starogardzki: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.7Wrocławski: 1.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.6Miasto Poznań: 1.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań1.5Miasto Warszawa: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa1.3Pilski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski1.2Siedlecki: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki1.2Tarnowski: 1.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1.2Białostocki: 1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki1.1Ostrołęcki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki1Słupski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1Tarnobrzeski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski1Koniński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.8Świecki: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.8Kaliski: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.7Rybnicki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.7Grudziądzki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.5Krośnieński: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.5Miasto Wrocław: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław0.5Bydgosko-toruński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.2Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Olsztyński: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński0.2Bielski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.1Gorzowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.1Trójmiejski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.1Ełcki: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0Przemyski: 0 per 1,000 inhabitantsPrzemyski0Elbląski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.1Inowrocławski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.1
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2017
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2016
1Gdański6.9+1.1 pts
2Poznański5.3+0.5 pts
3Nowosądecki4.2+0.5 pts
4Chojnicki3.7+0.4 pts
5Rzeszowski2.8+0.5 pts
6Leszczyński2.7+0.2 pts
7Nowotarski2.6+0.8 pts
8Warszawski wschodni2.4-0.6 pts
9Krakowski2+0.1 pts
9Miasto Kraków2-0.2 pts
9Tyski20 pts
9Warszawski zachodni2-0.4 pts
13Starogardzki1.7+0.7 pts
14Wrocławski1.6-0.1 pts
15Miasto Poznań1.5+0.5 pts
16Miasto Warszawa1.3-0.1 pts
17Pilski1.2+0.7 pts
17Siedlecki1.2+0.3 pts
17Tarnowski1.2+0.5 pts
20Białostocki1.1+0.7 pts
21Ostrołęcki1+0.5 pts
21Słupski1+0.7 pts
21Tarnobrzeski1+0.9 pts
24Koniński0.8+0.2 pts
24Świecki0.8+0.5 pts
26Kaliski0.7+0.1 pts
26Rybnicki0.7+0.1 pts
28Grudziądzki0.5+0.7 pts
28Krośnieński0.5+0.6 pts
28Miasto Wrocław0.5-0.5 pts
31Bydgosko-toruński0.2-0.1 pts
31Lubelski0.20 pts
31Olsztyński0.2+0.5 pts
34Bielski0.10 pts
34Gorzowski0.1+0.3 pts
34Trójmiejski0.1-0.2 pts
37Ełcki0+0.7 pts
37Przemyski0+0.6 pts
39Elbląski-0.1+0.4 pts
39Inowrocławski-0.1+0.6 pts
39Szczeciński-0.1-0.2 pts
39Zielonogórski-0.1+0.1 pts
43Suwalski-0.20 pts
44Żyrardowski-0.3+0.3 pts
45Legnicko-głogowski-0.4-0.3 pts
46Koszaliński-0.5+0.2 pts
46Oświęcimski-0.50 pts
48Bialski-0.60 pts
49Radomski-0.7+0.5 pts
50Gliwicki-0.90 pts
51Ciechanowski-1-0.1 pts
52Opolski-1.1-0.3 pts
53Płocki-1.2+0.3 pts
53Puławski-1.2+0.4 pts
55Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-1.5-0.1 pts
56Piotrkowski-1.6+0.4 pts
57Miasto Szczecin-1.7-0.3 pts
58Bytomski-1.8+0.3 pts
58Sieradzki-1.8+0.1 pts
60Katowicki-2.20 pts
60Kielecki-2.2+0.2 pts
60Włocławski-2.2-0.2 pts
63Skierniewicki-2.50 pts
64Łódzki-2.60 pts
64Łomżyński-2.6+0.1 pts
66Chełmsko-zamojski-3.1-0.2 pts
67Nyski-3.2-0.7 pts
68Jeleniogórski-3.3-0.3 pts
69Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-3.6-0.4 pts
70Częstochowski-3.8-0.2 pts
71Sosnowiecki-4.4-0.6 pts
71Wałbrzyski-4.4+0.2 pts
73Miasto Łódź-5.5-0.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2017,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2017
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2017.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 6.9 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2017, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Miasto Łódź, with -5.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2017.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings