NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration including statistical adjustment, 2024
Warszawski zachodni had the highest net migration including statistical adjustment of 73 areas in 2024, at 9,011. Chełmsko-zamojski had the lowest, at -2,537. The median was -375 and the figure for Poland was 33,247. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2024 | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warszawski zachodni | 9,011 | +4.6% |
| 2 | Miasto Warszawa | 8,654 | +154.6% |
| 3 | Poznański | 6,141 | +15.5% |
| 4 | Warszawski wschodni | 5,838 | +14.9% |
| 5 | Wrocławski | 5,770 | +3.2% |
| 6 | Gdański | 5,194 | +3.2% |
| 7 | Krakowski | 4,605 | +21.8% |
| 8 | Miasto Kraków | 4,310 | +61.4% |
| 9 | Miasto Wrocław | 2,808 | +220.2% |
| 10 | Trójmiejski | 2,330 | +98.5% |
| 11 | Łódzki | 2,216 | +12.9% |
| 12 | Rzeszowski | 2,169 | +139.1% |
| 13 | Szczeciński | 1,688 | +168.8% |
| 14 | Lubelski | 1,592 | +164.5% |
| 15 | Bydgosko-toruński | 1,534 | +846.9% |
| 16 | Białostocki | 849 | -15.1% |
| 17 | Katowicki | 655 | +157.8% |
| 18 | Koszaliński | 619 | +1,167.2% |
| 19 | Zielonogórski | 472 | +253.7% |
| 20 | Żyrardowski | 424 | +457.9% |
| 21 | Gorzowski | 351 | +176.1% |
| 22 | Tyski | 340 | +76.2% |
| 23 | Miasto Szczecin | 287 | +149.1% |
| 24 | Opolski | 259 | +135.8% |
| 25 | Bielski | 238 | +53.5% |
| 26 | Bytomski | 225 | +396.1% |
| 27 | Leszczyński | 157 | +140.7% |
| 28 | Słupski | 36 | +115.3% |
| 29 | Miasto Poznań | -34 | +96.7% |
| 30 | Miasto Łódź | -131 | +91.4% |
| 31 | Oświęcimski | -250 | +62.5% |
| 32 | Częstochowski | -261 | -769.2% |
| 33 | Chojnicki | -263 | +19.6% |
| 34 | Legnicko-głogowski | -307 | +51.3% |
| 35 | Nowotarski | -325 | +24.8% |
| 36 | Tarnowski | -365 | +24.7% |
| 37 | Skierniewicki | -375 | +46.6% |
| 38 | Świecki | -389 | +17.4% |
| 39 | Sosnowiecki | -408 | +55.3% |
| 40 | Olsztyński | -432 | +24.5% |
| 41 | Sieradzki | -448 | +33.9% |
| 42 | Kaliski | -474 | +49.6% |
| 43 | Suwalski | -510 | +44.7% |
| 44 | Nyski | -527 | +34.7% |
| 45 | Ciechanowski | -529 | +11.8% |
| 46 | Jeleniogórski | -548 | +3.5% |
| 47 | Koniński | -560 | +8% |
| 48 | Wałbrzyski | -617 | +40.7% |
| 49 | Pilski | -621 | -31.6% |
| 50 | Inowrocławski | -685 | +8.9% |
| 51 | Starogardzki | -689 | -15.4% |
| 52 | Piotrkowski | -690 | +20.4% |
| 53 | Ełcki | -756 | -1.9% |
| 54 | Gliwicki | -770 | +27.4% |
| 54 | Siedlecki | -770 | +13.7% |
| 56 | Płocki | -780 | -21.7% |
| 57 | Rybnicki | -832 | +6% |
| 58 | Grudziądzki | -872 | -2.2% |
| 59 | Nowosądecki | -927 | -26.5% |
| 60 | Włocławski | -958 | -14.9% |
| 61 | Bialski | -1,070 | -3.9% |
| 62 | Elbląski | -1,140 | +8.6% |
| 63 | Przemyski | -1,232 | +11% |
| 64 | Ostrołęcki | -1,235 | -66.9% |
| 65 | Łomżyński | -1,237 | -4.1% |
| 66 | Radomski | -1,241 | -16.7% |
| 67 | Krośnieński | -1,252 | +3.1% |
| 68 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki | -1,256 | -21.6% |
| 69 | Kielecki | -1,307 | +12.5% |
| 70 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski | -1,388 | -6.4% |
| 71 | Tarnobrzeski | -1,550 | -323.5% |
| 72 | Puławski | -1,977 | -16.2% |
| 73 | Chełmsko-zamojski | -2,537 | -6.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Population change during the year minus natural change (live births minus deaths), including statistical adjustment. A negative value means the population fell by more than natural change explains (Eurostat demographic balance).
Eurostat calculates this as a residual, not by counting immigrants and emigrants, so it also absorbs census revisions and other statistical adjustments. For the EU it reflects migration to and from countries outside the EU. net_migration (World Bank, UN estimate) uses a different method, so the two series differ.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by net migration including statistical adjustment using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_migration_plus_adjustment","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_migration_plus_adjustment&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest net migration including statistical adjustment?
Warszawski zachodni, with 9,011 in 2024, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest net migration including statistical adjustment?
Chełmsko-zamojski, with -2,537 in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, net migration plus statistical adjustment, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Net migration including statistical adjustment: other rankings
- NUTS 3 areas of Slovenia
- NUTS 3 areas of Greece
- NUTS 3 areas of Estonia
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- EU countries
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)