Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over, 2025

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2025, at 26%. Gdański had the lowest, at 15.1%. The median was 21.3% and the figure for Poland was 21%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest26Miasto Łódź
Lowest15.1Gdański
Median21.373 areas
Poland21History

Top 40 areas, 2025

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 26 %26WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 25.4 %25.4SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 25.2 %25.2JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 24.1 %24.1CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 24 %24KieleckiKielecki: 24 %24Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 23.9 %23.9Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 23.8 %23.8Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 23.5 %23.5NyskiNyski: 23.2 %23.2KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 23 %23Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 23 %23PuławskiPuławski: 22.9 %22.9ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 22.7 %22.7SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 22.7 %22.7KatowickiKatowicki: 22.6 %22.6Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 22.5 %22.5GliwickiGliwicki: 22.4 %22.4TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 22.4 %22.4WłocławskiWłocławski: 22.4 %22.4PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 22.1 %22.1ŁódzkiŁódzki: 21.9 %21.9SieradzkiSieradzki: 21.9 %21.9OpolskiOpolski: 21.8 %21.8OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 21.8 %21.8Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 21.7 %21.7KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 21.7 %21.7RadomskiRadomski: 21.7 %21.7ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 21.7 %21.7BytomskiBytomski: 21.6 %21.6Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 21.6 %21.6BialskiBialski: 21.5 %21.5PłockiPłocki: 21.5 %21.5PrzemyskiPrzemyski: 21.4 %21.4InowrocławskiInowrocławski: 21.3 %21.3OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 21.3 %21.3SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 21.3 %21.3ElbląskiElbląski: 21.2 %21.2LubelskiLubelski: 21.2 %21.2TarnobrzeskiTarnobrzeski: 21.2 %21.2
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2025 (%)Change on 2024
1Miasto Łódź26+0.4 pts
2Wałbrzyski25.4+0.8 pts
3Sosnowiecki25.2+0.6 pts
4Jeleniogórski24.1+0.8 pts
5Częstochowski24+0.7 pts
5Kielecki24+0.7 pts
7Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski23.9+0.7 pts
8Chełmsko-zamojski23.8+0.8 pts
9Miasto Szczecin23.5+0.5 pts
10Nyski23.2+0.8 pts
11Koszaliński23+0.6 pts
11Szczecinecko-pyrzycki23+0.8 pts
13Puławski22.9+0.6 pts
14Łomżyński22.7+0.7 pts
14Skierniewicki22.7+0.6 pts
16Katowicki22.6+0.6 pts
17Legnicko-głogowski22.5+0.6 pts
18Gliwicki22.4+0.7 pts
18Trójmiejski22.4+0.2 pts
18Włocławski22.4+0.7 pts
21Piotrkowski22.1+0.7 pts
22Łódzki21.9+0.4 pts
22Sieradzki21.9+0.7 pts
24Opolski21.8+0.6 pts
24Oświęcimski21.8+0.7 pts
26Bydgosko-toruński21.7+0.5 pts
26Krośnieński21.7+0.8 pts
26Radomski21.7+0.7 pts
26Zielonogórski21.7+0.6 pts
30Bytomski21.6+0.5 pts
30Miasto Poznań21.6+0.2 pts
32Bialski21.5+0.8 pts
32Płocki21.5+0.6 pts
34Przemyski21.4+0.7 pts
35Inowrocławski21.3+0.7 pts
35Olsztyński21.3+0.8 pts
35Szczeciński21.3+0.7 pts
38Elbląski21.2+0.8 pts
38Lubelski21.2+0.4 pts
38Tarnobrzeski21.2+0.7 pts
41Bielski21.1+0.5 pts
41Gorzowski21.1+0.6 pts
41Słupski21.1+0.7 pts
44Rybnicki20.9+0.6 pts
45Ełcki20.8+0.8 pts
45Suwalski20.8+0.7 pts
47Białostocki20.7+0.6 pts
48Miasto Wrocław20.6+0.2 pts
48Żyrardowski20.6+0.5 pts
50Ciechanowski20.5+0.7 pts
50Grudziądzki20.5+0.7 pts
52Koniński20.4+0.6 pts
52Świecki20.4+0.8 pts
54Kaliski20.3+0.6 pts
54Pilski20.3+0.7 pts
56Siedlecki20.2+0.5 pts
56Tarnowski20.2+0.6 pts
58Miasto Kraków19.9+0.1 pts
59Miasto Warszawa19.8+0.1 pts
59Ostrołęcki19.8+0.7 pts
61Tyski19.7+0.7 pts
62Starogardzki19.4+0.7 pts
63Chojnicki18.9+0.6 pts
64Leszczyński18.8+0.5 pts
65Rzeszowski18.6+0.4 pts
66Nowotarski18.5+0.5 pts
67Wrocławski18.1+0.4 pts
68Krakowski17.7+0.4 pts
69Warszawski zachodni17.5+0.2 pts
70Nowosądecki17.4+0.6 pts
71Warszawski wschodni17+0.2 pts
72Poznański16.1+0.4 pts
73Gdański15.1+0.3 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 26% in 2025, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 15.1% in 2025.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings