NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2023, at 25%. Gdański had the lowest, at 14.3%. The median was 19.9% and the figure for Poland was 19.9%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Lowest14.3Gdański
Median19.973 areas
Poland19.9History

Top 40 areas, 2023

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 25 %25SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 23.8 %23.8WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 23.7 %23.7CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 22.6 %22.6JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 22.5 %22.5KieleckiKielecki: 22.5 %22.5Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 22.5 %22.5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 22.5 %22.5Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 22.2 %22.2TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 21.9 %21.9NyskiNyski: 21.7 %21.7KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 21.6 %21.6PuławskiPuławski: 21.6 %21.6KatowickiKatowicki: 21.5 %21.5SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 21.4 %21.4ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 21.3 %21.3Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 21.3 %21.3Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 21.1 %21.1Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 21.1 %21.1GliwickiGliwicki: 21 %21WłocławskiWłocławski: 21 %21ŁódzkiŁódzki: 20.9 %20.9PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 20.7 %20.7Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 20.6 %20.6OpolskiOpolski: 20.6 %20.6SieradzkiSieradzki: 20.6 %20.6BytomskiBytomski: 20.4 %20.4OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 20.4 %20.4RadomskiRadomski: 20.4 %20.4PłockiPłocki: 20.3 %20.3ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 20.3 %20.3KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 20.2 %20.2LubelskiLubelski: 20.2 %20.2Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 20.1 %20.1BialskiBialski: 20 %20BielskiBielski: 20 %20InowrocławskiInowrocławski: 19.9 %19.9PrzemyskiPrzemyski: 19.9 %19.9GorzowskiGorzowski: 19.8 %19.8OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 19.8 %19.8
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2023 (%)Change on 2022
1Miasto Łódź Estimated25+0.5 pts
2Sosnowiecki Estimated23.8+0.7 pts
3Wałbrzyski Estimated23.7+0.7 pts
4Częstochowski Estimated22.6+0.7 pts
5Jeleniogórski Estimated22.5+0.8 pts
5Kielecki Estimated22.5+0.6 pts
5Miasto Szczecin Estimated22.5+0.5 pts
5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Estimated22.5+0.6 pts
9Chełmsko-zamojski Estimated22.2+0.8 pts
10Trójmiejski Estimated21.9+0.3 pts
11Nyski Estimated21.7+0.7 pts
12Koszaliński Estimated21.6+0.8 pts
12Puławski Estimated21.6+0.6 pts
14Katowicki Estimated21.5+0.5 pts
15Skierniewicki Estimated21.4+0.6 pts
16Łomżyński Estimated21.3+0.7 pts
16Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Estimated21.3+0.8 pts
18Legnicko-głogowski Estimated21.1+0.7 pts
18Miasto Poznań Estimated21.1+0.4 pts
20Gliwicki Estimated21+0.6 pts
20Włocławski Estimated21+0.7 pts
22Łódzki Estimated20.9+0.5 pts
23Piotrkowski Estimated20.7+0.6 pts
24Bydgosko-toruński Estimated20.6+0.6 pts
24Opolski Estimated20.6+0.5 pts
24Sieradzki Estimated20.6+0.6 pts
27Bytomski Estimated20.4+0.5 pts
27Oświęcimski Estimated20.4+0.6 pts
27Radomski Estimated20.4+0.7 pts
30Płocki Estimated20.3+0.6 pts
30Zielonogórski Estimated20.3+0.7 pts
32Krośnieński Estimated20.2+0.6 pts
32Lubelski Estimated20.2+0.5 pts
34Miasto Wrocław Estimated20.1+0.3 pts
35Bialski Estimated20+0.7 pts
35Bielski Estimated20+0.5 pts
37Inowrocławski Estimated19.9+0.8 pts
37Przemyski Estimated19.9+0.6 pts
39Gorzowski Estimated19.8+0.8 pts
39Olsztyński Estimated19.8+0.8 pts
39Szczeciński Estimated19.8+0.8 pts
39Tarnobrzeski Estimated19.8+0.6 pts
43Rybnicki Estimated19.7+0.6 pts
44Elbląski Estimated19.6+0.7 pts
44Słupski Estimated19.6+0.7 pts
46Białostocki Estimated19.5+0.5 pts
46Miasto Kraków Estimated19.5+0.2 pts
46Miasto Warszawa Estimated19.5+0.2 pts
49Suwalski Estimated19.4+0.7 pts
49Żyrardowski Estimated19.4+0.5 pts
51Ciechanowski Estimated19.2+0.6 pts
51Ełcki Estimated19.2+0.7 pts
51Kaliski Estimated19.2+0.6 pts
54Grudziądzki Estimated19.1+0.6 pts
54Koniński Estimated19.1+0.6 pts
54Siedlecki Estimated19.1+0.4 pts
57Tarnowski Estimated19+0.4 pts
58Pilski Estimated18.9+0.7 pts
59Świecki Estimated18.8+0.7 pts
60Ostrołęcki Estimated18.5+0.6 pts
61Tyski Estimated18.3+0.7 pts
62Starogardzki Estimated18+0.6 pts
63Leszczyński Estimated17.7+0.6 pts
63Rzeszowski Estimated17.7+0.3 pts
65Chojnicki Estimated17.6+0.5 pts
66Nowotarski Estimated17.5+0.4 pts
67Wrocławski Estimated17.1+0.4 pts
68Warszawski zachodni Estimated16.9+0.3 pts
69Krakowski Estimated16.8+0.4 pts
70Warszawski wschodni Estimated16.4+0.3 pts
71Nowosądecki Estimated16.3+0.4 pts
72Poznański Estimated15.2+0.5 pts
73Gdański Estimated14.3+0.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 25% in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 14.3% in 2023.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings