NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over
Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2023, at 25%. Gdański had the lowest, at 14.3%. The median was 19.9% and the figure for Poland was 19.9%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2023 (%) | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miasto Łódź Estimated | 25 | +0.5 pts |
| 2 | Sosnowiecki Estimated | 23.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 3 | Wałbrzyski Estimated | 23.7 | +0.7 pts |
| 4 | Częstochowski Estimated | 22.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 5 | Jeleniogórski Estimated | 22.5 | +0.8 pts |
| 5 | Kielecki Estimated | 22.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 5 | Miasto Szczecin Estimated | 22.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 5 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Estimated | 22.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 9 | Chełmsko-zamojski Estimated | 22.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 10 | Trójmiejski Estimated | 21.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 11 | Nyski Estimated | 21.7 | +0.7 pts |
| 12 | Koszaliński Estimated | 21.6 | +0.8 pts |
| 12 | Puławski Estimated | 21.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 14 | Katowicki Estimated | 21.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 15 | Skierniewicki Estimated | 21.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 16 | Łomżyński Estimated | 21.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 16 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Estimated | 21.3 | +0.8 pts |
| 18 | Legnicko-głogowski Estimated | 21.1 | +0.7 pts |
| 18 | Miasto Poznań Estimated | 21.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 20 | Gliwicki Estimated | 21 | +0.6 pts |
| 20 | Włocławski Estimated | 21 | +0.7 pts |
| 22 | Łódzki Estimated | 20.9 | +0.5 pts |
| 23 | Piotrkowski Estimated | 20.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 24 | Bydgosko-toruński Estimated | 20.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 24 | Opolski Estimated | 20.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 24 | Sieradzki Estimated | 20.6 | +0.6 pts |
| 27 | Bytomski Estimated | 20.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 27 | Oświęcimski Estimated | 20.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 27 | Radomski Estimated | 20.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 30 | Płocki Estimated | 20.3 | +0.6 pts |
| 30 | Zielonogórski Estimated | 20.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 32 | Krośnieński Estimated | 20.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 32 | Lubelski Estimated | 20.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 34 | Miasto Wrocław Estimated | 20.1 | +0.3 pts |
| 35 | Bialski Estimated | 20 | +0.7 pts |
| 35 | Bielski Estimated | 20 | +0.5 pts |
| 37 | Inowrocławski Estimated | 19.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 37 | Przemyski Estimated | 19.9 | +0.6 pts |
| 39 | Gorzowski Estimated | 19.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 39 | Olsztyński Estimated | 19.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 39 | Szczeciński Estimated | 19.8 | +0.8 pts |
| 39 | Tarnobrzeski Estimated | 19.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 43 | Rybnicki Estimated | 19.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 44 | Elbląski Estimated | 19.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 44 | Słupski Estimated | 19.6 | +0.7 pts |
| 46 | Białostocki Estimated | 19.5 | +0.5 pts |
| 46 | Miasto Kraków Estimated | 19.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 46 | Miasto Warszawa Estimated | 19.5 | +0.2 pts |
| 49 | Suwalski Estimated | 19.4 | +0.7 pts |
| 49 | Żyrardowski Estimated | 19.4 | +0.5 pts |
| 51 | Ciechanowski Estimated | 19.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 51 | Ełcki Estimated | 19.2 | +0.7 pts |
| 51 | Kaliski Estimated | 19.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 54 | Grudziądzki Estimated | 19.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 54 | Koniński Estimated | 19.1 | +0.6 pts |
| 54 | Siedlecki Estimated | 19.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 57 | Tarnowski Estimated | 19 | +0.4 pts |
| 58 | Pilski Estimated | 18.9 | +0.7 pts |
| 59 | Świecki Estimated | 18.8 | +0.7 pts |
| 60 | Ostrołęcki Estimated | 18.5 | +0.6 pts |
| 61 | Tyski Estimated | 18.3 | +0.7 pts |
| 62 | Starogardzki Estimated | 18 | +0.6 pts |
| 63 | Leszczyński Estimated | 17.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 63 | Rzeszowski Estimated | 17.7 | +0.3 pts |
| 65 | Chojnicki Estimated | 17.6 | +0.5 pts |
| 66 | Nowotarski Estimated | 17.5 | +0.4 pts |
| 67 | Wrocławski Estimated | 17.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 68 | Warszawski zachodni Estimated | 16.9 | +0.3 pts |
| 69 | Krakowski Estimated | 16.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 70 | Warszawski wschodni Estimated | 16.4 | +0.3 pts |
| 71 | Nowosądecki Estimated | 16.3 | +0.4 pts |
| 72 | Poznański Estimated | 15.2 | +0.5 pts |
| 73 | Gdański Estimated | 14.3 | +0.4 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?
Miasto Łódź, with 25% in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?
Gdański, with 14.3% in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Population aged 65 and over: other rankings
- Countries
- EU countries
- US states
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- US counties
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Municipalities of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)