Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2016, at 20.8%. Gdański had the lowest, at 11.4%. The median was 15.5% and the figure for Poland was 16%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest20.8Miasto Łódź
Lowest11.4Gdański
Median15.573 areas
Poland16History

Top 40 areas, 2016

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 20.8 %20.8TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 19.1 %19.1Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 19 %19Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 18.5 %18.5Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 18.5 %18.5Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 18.3 %18.3Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 18.3 %18.3SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 18 %18KatowickiKatowicki: 17.9 %17.9CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 17.5 %17.5ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 17.5 %17.5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 17.5 %17.5WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 17.4 %17.4KieleckiKielecki: 17.2 %17.2ŁódzkiŁódzki: 17.2 %17.2OpolskiOpolski: 17.2 %17.2BytomskiBytomski: 17.1 %17.1SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 17.1 %17.1GliwickiGliwicki: 17 %17PuławskiPuławski: 17 %17Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 16.9 %16.9NyskiNyski: 16.6 %16.6Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 16.4 %16.4SieradzkiSieradzki: 16.4 %16.4LubelskiLubelski: 16.3 %16.3JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 16.2 %16.2BielskiBielski: 16.1 %16.1OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 16.1 %16.1BiałostockiBiałostocki: 16 %16KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 15.9 %15.9PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 15.9 %15.9PłockiPłocki: 15.9 %15.9WłocławskiWłocławski: 15.9 %15.9RybnickiRybnicki: 15.7 %15.7BialskiBialski: 15.5 %15.5SiedleckiSiedlecki: 15.5 %15.5SuwalskiSuwalski: 15.5 %15.5ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 15.5 %15.5KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 15.4 %15.4RadomskiRadomski: 15.4 %15.4
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2016 (%)Change on 2015
1Miasto Łódź20.8+0.7 pts
2Trójmiejski19.1+0.7 pts
3Miasto Warszawa19+0.3 pts
4Miasto Poznań18.5+0.6 pts
4Miasto Wrocław18.5+0.6 pts
6Miasto Kraków18.3+0.5 pts
6Miasto Szczecin18.3+0.8 pts
8Sosnowiecki18+0.8 pts
9Katowicki17.9+0.5 pts
10Częstochowski17.5+0.6 pts
10Łomżyński17.5+0.3 pts
10Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski17.5+0.5 pts
13Wałbrzyski17.4+0.7 pts
14Kielecki17.2+0.6 pts
14Łódzki17.2+0.6 pts
14Opolski17.2+0.6 pts
17Bytomski17.1+0.6 pts
17Skierniewicki17.1+0.6 pts
19Gliwicki17+0.6 pts
19Puławski17+0.4 pts
21Chełmsko-zamojski16.9+0.5 pts
22Nyski16.6+0.6 pts
23Bydgosko-toruński16.4+0.7 pts
23Sieradzki16.4+0.4 pts
25Lubelski16.3+0.6 pts
26Jeleniogórski16.2+0.8 pts
27Bielski16.1+0.6 pts
27Oświęcimski16.1+0.4 pts
29Białostocki16+0.4 pts
30Koszaliński15.9+0.8 pts
30Piotrkowski15.9+0.5 pts
30Płocki15.9+0.6 pts
30Włocławski15.9+0.6 pts
34Rybnicki15.7+0.7 pts
35Bialski15.5+0.5 pts
35Siedlecki15.5+0.4 pts
35Suwalski15.5+0.5 pts
35Żyrardowski15.5+0.4 pts
39Krośnieński15.4+0.5 pts
39Radomski15.4+0.4 pts
41Legnicko-głogowski15.3+0.8 pts
41Przemyski15.3+0.4 pts
41Tarnowski15.3+0.4 pts
44Kaliski15.2+0.5 pts
45Ciechanowski15.1+0.5 pts
45Tarnobrzeski15.1+0.4 pts
45Zielonogórski15.1+0.7 pts
48Inowrocławski14.8+0.7 pts
48Rzeszowski14.8+0.3 pts
48Szczecinecko-pyrzycki14.8+0.7 pts
51Gorzowski14.7+0.7 pts
51Grudziądzki14.7+0.6 pts
51Koniński14.7+0.5 pts
54Warszawski zachodni14.6+0.5 pts
55Nowotarski14.4+0.4 pts
55Olsztyński14.4+0.6 pts
55Ostrołęcki14.4+0.4 pts
58Słupski14.3+0.7 pts
59Elbląski14.2+0.7 pts
60Ełcki14.1+0.5 pts
61Krakowski14+0.3 pts
61Szczeciński14+0.8 pts
61Tyski14+0.6 pts
64Leszczyński13.9+0.6 pts
64Świecki13.9+0.7 pts
64Warszawski wschodni13.9+0.4 pts
64Wrocławski13.9+0.5 pts
68Pilski13.8+0.5 pts
69Nowosądecki13.3+0.3 pts
70Starogardzki13.2+0.6 pts
71Chojnicki13.1+0.5 pts
72Poznański12.2+0.5 pts
73Gdański11.4+0.5 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 20.8% in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 11.4% in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings