Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2022, at 24.5%. Gdański had the lowest, at 13.9%. The median was 19.3% and the figure for Poland was 19.4%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest24.5Miasto Łódź
Lowest13.9Gdański
Median19.373 areas
Poland19.4History

Top 40 areas, 2022

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 24.5 %24.5SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 23.1 %23.1WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 23 %23Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 22 %22CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 21.9 %21.9KieleckiKielecki: 21.9 %21.9Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 21.9 %21.9JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 21.7 %21.7TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 21.6 %21.6Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 21.4 %21.4KatowickiKatowicki: 21 %21NyskiNyski: 21 %21PuławskiPuławski: 21 %21KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 20.8 %20.8SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 20.8 %20.8Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 20.7 %20.7ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 20.6 %20.6Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 20.5 %20.5GliwickiGliwicki: 20.4 %20.4Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 20.4 %20.4ŁódzkiŁódzki: 20.4 %20.4WłocławskiWłocławski: 20.3 %20.3OpolskiOpolski: 20.1 %20.1PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 20.1 %20.1Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 20 %20SieradzkiSieradzki: 20 %20BytomskiBytomski: 19.9 %19.9Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 19.8 %19.8OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 19.8 %19.8LubelskiLubelski: 19.7 %19.7PłockiPłocki: 19.7 %19.7RadomskiRadomski: 19.7 %19.7KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 19.6 %19.6ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 19.6 %19.6BielskiBielski: 19.5 %19.5BialskiBialski: 19.3 %19.3Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 19.3 %19.3Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 19.3 %19.3PrzemyskiPrzemyski: 19.3 %19.3TarnobrzeskiTarnobrzeski: 19.2 %19.2
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2022 (%)Change on 2021
1Miasto Łódź Estimated24.5+0.4 pts
2Sosnowiecki Estimated23.1+0.7 pts
3Wałbrzyski Estimated23+0.6 pts
4Miasto Szczecin Estimated22+0.5 pts
5Częstochowski Estimated21.9+0.5 pts
5Kielecki Estimated21.9+0.6 pts
5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Estimated21.9+0.6 pts
8Jeleniogórski Estimated21.7+0.7 pts
9Trójmiejski Estimated21.6+0.3 pts
10Chełmsko-zamojski Estimated21.4+0.5 pts
11Katowicki Estimated21+0.4 pts
11Nyski Estimated21+0.5 pts
11Puławski Estimated21+0.4 pts
14Koszaliński Estimated20.8+0.7 pts
14Skierniewicki Estimated20.8+0.4 pts
16Miasto Poznań Estimated20.7+0.3 pts
17Łomżyński Estimated20.6+0.3 pts
18Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Estimated20.5+0.8 pts
19Gliwicki Estimated20.4+0.6 pts
19Legnicko-głogowski Estimated20.4+0.6 pts
19Łódzki Estimated20.4+0.4 pts
22Włocławski Estimated20.3+0.5 pts
23Opolski Estimated20.1+0.4 pts
23Piotrkowski Estimated20.1+0.6 pts
25Bydgosko-toruński Estimated20+0.4 pts
25Sieradzki Estimated20+0.5 pts
27Bytomski Estimated19.9+0.4 pts
28Miasto Wrocław Estimated19.8+0.2 pts
28Oświęcimski Estimated19.8+0.4 pts
30Lubelski Estimated19.7+0.3 pts
30Płocki Estimated19.7+0.4 pts
30Radomski Estimated19.7+0.5 pts
33Krośnieński Estimated19.6+0.5 pts
33Zielonogórski Estimated19.6+0.6 pts
35Bielski Estimated19.5+0.4 pts
36Bialski Estimated19.3+0.4 pts
36Miasto Kraków Estimated19.3+0.2 pts
36Miasto Warszawa Estimated19.3+0.1 pts
36Przemyski Estimated19.3+0.4 pts
40Tarnobrzeski Estimated19.2+0.4 pts
41Inowrocławski Estimated19.1+0.5 pts
41Rybnicki Estimated19.1+0.3 pts
43Białostocki Estimated19+0.3 pts
43Gorzowski Estimated19+0.6 pts
43Olsztyński Estimated19+0.6 pts
43Szczeciński Estimated19+0.7 pts
47Elbląski Estimated18.9+0.6 pts
47Słupski Estimated18.9+0.6 pts
47Żyrardowski Estimated18.9+0.4 pts
50Siedlecki Estimated18.7+0.4 pts
50Suwalski Estimated18.7+0.4 pts
52Ciechanowski Estimated18.6+0.5 pts
52Kaliski Estimated18.6+0.4 pts
52Tarnowski Estimated18.6+0.4 pts
55Ełcki Estimated18.5+0.6 pts
55Grudziądzki Estimated18.5+0.5 pts
55Koniński Estimated18.5+0.5 pts
58Pilski Estimated18.2+0.6 pts
59Świecki Estimated18.1+0.6 pts
60Ostrołęcki Estimated17.9+0.4 pts
61Tyski Estimated17.6+0.5 pts
62Rzeszowski Estimated17.4+0.2 pts
62Starogardzki Estimated17.4+0.6 pts
64Chojnicki Estimated17.1+0.6 pts
64Leszczyński Estimated17.1+0.4 pts
64Nowotarski Estimated17.1+0.3 pts
67Wrocławski Estimated16.7+0.4 pts
68Warszawski zachodni Estimated16.6+0.3 pts
69Krakowski Estimated16.4+0.3 pts
70Warszawski wschodni Estimated16.1+0.3 pts
71Nowosądecki Estimated15.9+0.3 pts
72Poznański Estimated14.7+0.4 pts
73Gdański Estimated13.9+0.3 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 24.5% in 2022, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 13.9% in 2022.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings