Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2019, at 23.1%. Gdański had the lowest, at 12.7%. The median was 17.2% and the figure for Poland was 17.7%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest23.1Miasto Łódź
Lowest12.7Gdański
Median17.273 areas
Poland17.7History

Top 40 areas, 2019

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 23.1 %23.1TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 20.9 %20.9Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 20.6 %20.6Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 20.5 %20.5SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 20.5 %20.5Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 20.3 %20.3Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 20.2 %20.2WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 19.9 %19.9Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 19.7 %19.7KatowickiKatowicki: 19.6 %19.6CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 19.5 %19.5KieleckiKielecki: 19.2 %19.2Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 19.2 %19.2GliwickiGliwicki: 18.9 %18.9ŁódzkiŁódzki: 18.9 %18.9BytomskiBytomski: 18.8 %18.8OpolskiOpolski: 18.8 %18.8SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 18.8 %18.8JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 18.7 %18.7ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 18.6 %18.6PuławskiPuławski: 18.6 %18.6Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 18.5 %18.5NyskiNyski: 18.4 %18.4Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 18.3 %18.3KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 18.2 %18.2LubelskiLubelski: 17.9 %17.9SieradzkiSieradzki: 17.9 %17.9BielskiBielski: 17.8 %17.8Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 17.8 %17.8OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 17.8 %17.8PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 17.7 %17.7WłocławskiWłocławski: 17.7 %17.7PłockiPłocki: 17.6 %17.6RybnickiRybnicki: 17.5 %17.5BiałostockiBiałostocki: 17.3 %17.3RadomskiRadomski: 17.2 %17.2ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 17.2 %17.2KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 17.1 %17.1Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 17.1 %17.1ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 17.1 %17.1
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2019 (%)Change on 2018
1Miasto Łódź23.1+0.7 pts
2Trójmiejski20.9+0.5 pts
3Miasto Szczecin20.6+0.6 pts
4Miasto Poznań20.5+0.7 pts
4Sosnowiecki20.5+0.9 pts
6Miasto Warszawa20.3+0.4 pts
7Miasto Wrocław20.2+0.5 pts
8Wałbrzyski19.9+0.8 pts
9Miasto Kraków19.7+0.4 pts
10Katowicki19.6+0.5 pts
11Częstochowski19.5+0.6 pts
12Kielecki19.2+0.7 pts
12Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski19.2+0.5 pts
14Gliwicki18.9+0.6 pts
14Łódzki18.9+0.5 pts
16Bytomski18.8+0.6 pts
16Opolski18.8+0.6 pts
16Skierniewicki18.8+0.6 pts
19Jeleniogórski18.7+0.8 pts
20Łomżyński18.6+0.4 pts
20Puławski18.6+0.5 pts
22Chełmsko-zamojski18.5+0.6 pts
23Nyski18.4+0.6 pts
24Bydgosko-toruński18.3+0.6 pts
25Koszaliński18.2+0.8 pts
26Lubelski17.9+0.5 pts
26Sieradzki17.9+0.5 pts
28Bielski17.8+0.5 pts
28Legnicko-głogowski17.8+0.8 pts
28Oświęcimski17.8+0.6 pts
31Piotrkowski17.7+0.6 pts
31Włocławski17.7+0.6 pts
33Płocki17.6+0.5 pts
34Rybnicki17.5+0.5 pts
35Białostocki17.3+0.5 pts
36Radomski17.2+0.7 pts
36Zielonogórski17.2+0.7 pts
38Krośnieński17.1+0.6 pts
38Szczecinecko-pyrzycki17.1+0.8 pts
38Żyrardowski17.1+0.6 pts
41Bialski17+0.5 pts
42Siedlecki16.9+0.5 pts
43Gorzowski16.8+0.7 pts
43Kaliski16.8+0.5 pts
43Tarnobrzeski16.8+0.6 pts
46Przemyski16.7+0.5 pts
46Suwalski16.7+0.4 pts
48Inowrocławski16.6+0.6 pts
48Tarnowski16.6+0.5 pts
50Ciechanowski16.5+0.5 pts
51Koniński16.4+0.5 pts
51Słupski16.4+0.7 pts
53Grudziądzki16.3+0.6 pts
53Olsztyński16.3+0.6 pts
53Szczeciński16.3+0.8 pts
56Elbląski16.1+0.6 pts
56Warszawski zachodni16.1+0.5 pts
58Rzeszowski16+0.4 pts
59Ostrołęcki15.8+0.5 pts
59Tyski15.8+0.6 pts
61Ełcki15.7+0.5 pts
61Wrocławski15.7+0.6 pts
63Pilski15.6+0.5 pts
63Świecki15.6+0.6 pts
65Leszczyński15.5+0.6 pts
65Nowotarski15.5+0.3 pts
67Krakowski15.2+0.4 pts
67Warszawski wschodni15.2+0.4 pts
69Starogardzki15+0.6 pts
70Chojnicki14.8+0.5 pts
71Nowosądecki14.3+0.3 pts
72Poznański13.6+0.4 pts
73Gdański12.7+0.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 23.1% in 2019, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 12.7% in 2019.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings