Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2024, at 25.6%. Gdański had the lowest, at 14.8%. The median was 20.6% and the figure for Poland was 20.5%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest25.6Miasto Łódź
Lowest14.8Gdański
Median20.673 areas
Poland20.5History

Top 40 areas, 2024

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 25.6 %25.6SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 24.6 %24.6WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 24.6 %24.6CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 23.3 %23.3JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 23.3 %23.3KieleckiKielecki: 23.3 %23.3Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 23.2 %23.2Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 23 %23Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 23 %23KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 22.4 %22.4NyskiNyski: 22.4 %22.4PuławskiPuławski: 22.3 %22.3Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 22.2 %22.2TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 22.2 %22.2SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 22.1 %22.1KatowickiKatowicki: 22 %22ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 22 %22Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 21.9 %21.9GliwickiGliwicki: 21.7 %21.7WłocławskiWłocławski: 21.7 %21.7ŁódzkiŁódzki: 21.5 %21.5Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 21.4 %21.4PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 21.4 %21.4Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 21.2 %21.2OpolskiOpolski: 21.2 %21.2SieradzkiSieradzki: 21.2 %21.2BytomskiBytomski: 21.1 %21.1OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 21.1 %21.1ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 21.1 %21.1RadomskiRadomski: 21 %21KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 20.9 %20.9PłockiPłocki: 20.9 %20.9LubelskiLubelski: 20.8 %20.8BialskiBialski: 20.7 %20.7PrzemyskiPrzemyski: 20.7 %20.7BielskiBielski: 20.6 %20.6InowrocławskiInowrocławski: 20.6 %20.6SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 20.6 %20.6GorzowskiGorzowski: 20.5 %20.5OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 20.5 %20.5
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2024 (%)Change on 2023
1Miasto Łódź25.6+0.6 pts
2Sosnowiecki24.6+0.8 pts
2Wałbrzyski24.6+0.9 pts
4Częstochowski23.3+0.7 pts
4Jeleniogórski23.3+0.8 pts
4Kielecki23.3+0.8 pts
7Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski23.2+0.7 pts
8Chełmsko-zamojski23+0.8 pts
8Miasto Szczecin23+0.5 pts
10Koszaliński22.4+0.8 pts
10Nyski22.4+0.7 pts
12Puławski22.3+0.7 pts
13Szczecinecko-pyrzycki22.2+0.9 pts
13Trójmiejski22.2+0.3 pts
15Skierniewicki22.1+0.7 pts
16Katowicki22+0.5 pts
16Łomżyński22+0.7 pts
18Legnicko-głogowski21.9+0.8 pts
19Gliwicki21.7+0.7 pts
19Włocławski21.7+0.7 pts
21Łódzki21.5+0.6 pts
22Miasto Poznań21.4+0.3 pts
22Piotrkowski21.4+0.7 pts
24Bydgosko-toruński21.2+0.6 pts
24Opolski21.2+0.6 pts
24Sieradzki21.2+0.6 pts
27Bytomski21.1+0.7 pts
27Oświęcimski21.1+0.7 pts
27Zielonogórski21.1+0.8 pts
30Radomski21+0.6 pts
31Krośnieński20.9+0.7 pts
31Płocki20.9+0.6 pts
33Lubelski20.8+0.6 pts
34Bialski20.7+0.7 pts
34Przemyski20.7+0.8 pts
36Bielski20.6+0.6 pts
36Inowrocławski20.6+0.7 pts
36Szczeciński20.6+0.8 pts
39Gorzowski20.5+0.7 pts
39Olsztyński20.5+0.7 pts
39Tarnobrzeski20.5+0.7 pts
42Elbląski20.4+0.8 pts
42Miasto Wrocław20.4+0.3 pts
42Słupski20.4+0.8 pts
45Rybnicki20.3+0.6 pts
46Białostocki20.1+0.6 pts
46Suwalski20.1+0.7 pts
46Żyrardowski20.1+0.7 pts
49Ełcki20+0.8 pts
50Ciechanowski19.8+0.6 pts
50Grudziądzki19.8+0.7 pts
50Koniński19.8+0.7 pts
50Miasto Kraków19.8+0.3 pts
54Kaliski19.7+0.5 pts
54Miasto Warszawa19.7+0.2 pts
54Siedlecki19.7+0.6 pts
57Pilski19.6+0.7 pts
57Świecki19.6+0.8 pts
57Tarnowski19.6+0.6 pts
60Ostrołęcki19.1+0.6 pts
61Tyski19+0.7 pts
62Starogardzki18.7+0.7 pts
63Chojnicki18.3+0.7 pts
63Leszczyński18.3+0.6 pts
65Rzeszowski18.2+0.5 pts
66Nowotarski18+0.5 pts
67Wrocławski17.7+0.6 pts
68Krakowski17.3+0.5 pts
68Warszawski zachodni17.3+0.4 pts
70Nowosądecki16.8+0.5 pts
70Warszawski wschodni16.8+0.4 pts
72Poznański15.7+0.5 pts
73Gdański14.8+0.5 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 25.6% in 2024, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 14.8% in 2024.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings