Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2015, at 20.1%. Gdański had the lowest, at 10.9%. The median was 15% and the figure for Poland was 15.4%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest20.1Miasto Łódź
Lowest10.9Gdański
Median1573 areas
Poland15.4History

Top 40 areas, 2015

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 20.1 %20.1Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 18.7 %18.7TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 18.4 %18.4Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 17.9 %17.9Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 17.9 %17.9Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 17.8 %17.8Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 17.5 %17.5KatowickiKatowicki: 17.4 %17.4ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 17.2 %17.2SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 17.2 %17.2Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 17 %17CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 16.9 %16.9WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 16.7 %16.7KieleckiKielecki: 16.6 %16.6ŁódzkiŁódzki: 16.6 %16.6OpolskiOpolski: 16.6 %16.6PuławskiPuławski: 16.6 %16.6BytomskiBytomski: 16.5 %16.5SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 16.5 %16.5Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 16.4 %16.4GliwickiGliwicki: 16.4 %16.4NyskiNyski: 16 %16SieradzkiSieradzki: 16 %16Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 15.7 %15.7LubelskiLubelski: 15.7 %15.7OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 15.7 %15.7BiałostockiBiałostocki: 15.6 %15.6BielskiBielski: 15.5 %15.5JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 15.4 %15.4PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 15.4 %15.4PłockiPłocki: 15.3 %15.3WłocławskiWłocławski: 15.3 %15.3KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 15.1 %15.1SiedleckiSiedlecki: 15.1 %15.1ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 15.1 %15.1BialskiBialski: 15 %15RadomskiRadomski: 15 %15RybnickiRybnicki: 15 %15SuwalskiSuwalski: 15 %15KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 14.9 %14.9
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2015 (%)Change on 2014
1Miasto Łódź20.1+0.7 pts
2Miasto Warszawa18.7+0.3 pts
3Trójmiejski18.4+0.6 pts
4Miasto Poznań17.9+0.7 pts
4Miasto Wrocław17.9+0.6 pts
6Miasto Kraków17.8+0.5 pts
7Miasto Szczecin17.5+0.7 pts
8Katowicki17.4+0.6 pts
9Łomżyński17.2+0.3 pts
9Sosnowiecki17.2+0.7 pts
11Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski17+0.4 pts
12Częstochowski16.9+0.5 pts
13Wałbrzyski16.7+0.7 pts
14Kielecki16.6+0.6 pts
14Łódzki16.6+0.5 pts
14Opolski16.6+0.5 pts
14Puławski16.6+0.5 pts
18Bytomski16.5+0.5 pts
18Skierniewicki16.5+0.5 pts
20Chełmsko-zamojski16.4+0.5 pts
20Gliwicki16.4+0.5 pts
22Nyski16+0.7 pts
22Sieradzki16+0.4 pts
24Bydgosko-toruński15.7+0.7 pts
24Lubelski15.7+0.5 pts
24Oświęcimski15.7+0.5 pts
27Białostocki15.6+0.4 pts
28Bielski15.5+0.5 pts
29Jeleniogórski15.4+0.7 pts
29Piotrkowski15.4+0.5 pts
31Płocki15.3+0.6 pts
31Włocławski15.3+0.6 pts
33Koszaliński15.1+0.8 pts
33Siedlecki15.1+0.4 pts
33Żyrardowski15.1+0.4 pts
36Bialski15+0.4 pts
36Radomski15+0.4 pts
36Rybnicki15+0.6 pts
36Suwalski15+0.4 pts
40Krośnieński14.9+0.5 pts
40Przemyski14.9+0.5 pts
40Tarnowski14.9+0.3 pts
43Kaliski14.7+0.6 pts
43Tarnobrzeski14.7+0.5 pts
45Ciechanowski14.6+0.4 pts
46Legnicko-głogowski14.5+0.9 pts
46Rzeszowski14.5+0.4 pts
48Zielonogórski14.4+0.8 pts
49Koniński14.2+0.6 pts
50Grudziądzki14.1+0.5 pts
50Inowrocławski14.1+0.6 pts
50Szczecinecko-pyrzycki14.1+0.7 pts
50Warszawski zachodni14.1+0.4 pts
54Gorzowski14+0.7 pts
54Nowotarski14+0.3 pts
54Ostrołęcki14+0.3 pts
57Olsztyński13.8+0.6 pts
58Krakowski13.7+0.3 pts
59Ełcki13.6+0.5 pts
59Słupski13.6+0.6 pts
61Elbląski13.5+0.6 pts
61Warszawski wschodni13.5+0.4 pts
63Tyski13.4+0.5 pts
63Wrocławski13.4+0.6 pts
65Leszczyński13.3+0.6 pts
65Pilski13.3+0.6 pts
67Świecki13.2+0.6 pts
67Szczeciński13.2+0.8 pts
69Nowosądecki13+0.3 pts
70Chojnicki12.6+0.6 pts
70Starogardzki12.6+0.7 pts
72Poznański11.7+0.5 pts
73Gdański10.9+0.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 20.1% in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 10.9% in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings