Data / Rankings / Population aged 65 and over / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over

Miasto Łódź had the highest share of population aged 65 and over of 73 areas in 2020, at 23.8%. Gdański had the lowest, at 13.1%. The median was 17.8% and the figure for Poland was 18.2%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest23.8Miasto Łódź
Lowest13.1Gdański
Median17.873 areas
Poland18.2History

Top 40 areas, 2020

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 23.8 %23.8SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 21.4 %21.4TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 21.4 %21.4Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 21.3 %21.3Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 21.1 %21.1Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 20.7 %20.7Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 20.6 %20.6WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 20.6 %20.6KatowickiKatowicki: 20.2 %20.2CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 20.1 %20.1Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 20 %20KieleckiKielecki: 19.9 %19.9Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 19.8 %19.8GliwickiGliwicki: 19.5 %19.5JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 19.5 %19.5ŁódzkiŁódzki: 19.4 %19.4OpolskiOpolski: 19.4 %19.4BytomskiBytomski: 19.3 %19.3SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 19.3 %19.3Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 19.2 %19.2PuławskiPuławski: 19.2 %19.2NyskiNyski: 19.1 %19.1ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 19 %19KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 18.9 %18.9Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 18.8 %18.8Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 18.6 %18.6LubelskiLubelski: 18.5 %18.5SieradzkiSieradzki: 18.4 %18.4WłocławskiWłocławski: 18.4 %18.4BielskiBielski: 18.3 %18.3OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 18.3 %18.3PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 18.3 %18.3PłockiPłocki: 18.2 %18.2RybnickiRybnicki: 18.1 %18.1Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 17.9 %17.9ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 17.9 %17.9BiałostockiBiałostocki: 17.8 %17.8RadomskiRadomski: 17.8 %17.8ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 17.7 %17.7KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 17.6 %17.6
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2020 (%)Change on 2019
1Miasto Łódź23.8+0.7 pts
2Sosnowiecki21.4+0.9 pts
2Trójmiejski21.4+0.5 pts
4Miasto Szczecin21.3+0.7 pts
5Miasto Poznań21.1+0.6 pts
6Miasto Wrocław20.7+0.5 pts
7Miasto Warszawa20.6+0.3 pts
7Wałbrzyski20.6+0.7 pts
9Katowicki20.2+0.6 pts
10Częstochowski20.1+0.6 pts
11Miasto Kraków20+0.3 pts
12Kielecki19.9+0.7 pts
13Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski19.8+0.6 pts
14Gliwicki19.5+0.6 pts
14Jeleniogórski19.5+0.8 pts
16Łódzki19.4+0.5 pts
16Opolski19.4+0.6 pts
18Bytomski19.3+0.5 pts
18Skierniewicki19.3+0.5 pts
20Chełmsko-zamojski19.2+0.7 pts
20Puławski19.2+0.6 pts
22Nyski19.1+0.7 pts
23Łomżyński19+0.4 pts
24Koszaliński18.9+0.7 pts
25Bydgosko-toruński18.8+0.5 pts
26Legnicko-głogowski18.6+0.8 pts
27Lubelski18.5+0.6 pts
28Sieradzki18.4+0.5 pts
28Włocławski18.4+0.7 pts
30Bielski18.3+0.5 pts
30Oświęcimski18.3+0.5 pts
30Piotrkowski18.3+0.6 pts
33Płocki18.2+0.6 pts
34Rybnicki18.1+0.6 pts
35Szczecinecko-pyrzycki17.9+0.8 pts
35Zielonogórski17.9+0.7 pts
37Białostocki17.8+0.5 pts
37Radomski17.8+0.6 pts
39Żyrardowski17.7+0.6 pts
40Krośnieński17.6+0.5 pts
41Bialski17.5+0.5 pts
42Gorzowski17.4+0.6 pts
42Kaliski17.4+0.6 pts
42Siedlecki17.4+0.5 pts
42Tarnobrzeski17.4+0.6 pts
46Przemyski17.3+0.6 pts
47Inowrocławski17.2+0.6 pts
47Suwalski17.2+0.5 pts
49Słupski17.1+0.7 pts
49Szczeciński17.1+0.8 pts
51Ciechanowski17+0.5 pts
51Koniński17+0.6 pts
51Olsztyński17+0.7 pts
51Tarnowski17+0.4 pts
55Grudziądzki16.9+0.6 pts
56Elbląski16.8+0.7 pts
57Warszawski zachodni16.5+0.4 pts
58Rzeszowski16.4+0.4 pts
58Tyski16.4+0.6 pts
60Ełcki16.3+0.6 pts
60Ostrołęcki16.3+0.5 pts
60Pilski16.3+0.7 pts
63Świecki16.2+0.6 pts
64Wrocławski16.1+0.4 pts
65Leszczyński16+0.5 pts
66Nowotarski15.9+0.4 pts
67Krakowski15.6+0.4 pts
67Starogardzki15.6+0.6 pts
67Warszawski wschodni15.6+0.4 pts
70Chojnicki15.4+0.6 pts
71Nowosądecki14.6+0.3 pts
72Poznański14+0.4 pts
73Gdański13.1+0.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Residents aged 65 or over as a percentage of total population. Spain: 1 January, INE annual census. United States: 1 July, Census Bureau population estimates. World Bank figures for other countries and the World refer to mid-year.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by share of population aged 65 and over using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"population_65_plus_share","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=population_65_plus_share&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest share of population aged 65 and over?

Miasto Łódź, with 23.8% in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest share of population aged 65 and over?

Gdański, with 13.1% in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 3 region (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Population aged 65 and over: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings