Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 73 areas in 2016, at 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -5.1 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest5.8Gdański
Lowest-5.1Miasto Łódź
Median-0.273 areas
Poland-0.2History

Top 40 areas, 2016

Gdański: 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.8Poznański: 4.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.8Nowosądecki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.7Chojnicki: 3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki3.3Warszawski wschodni: 3 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni3Leszczyński: 2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.5Warszawski zachodni: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2.4Rzeszowski: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.3Miasto Kraków: 2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków2.2Tyski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2Krakowski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.9Nowotarski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.8Wrocławski: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.7Miasto Warszawa: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa1.4Miasto Poznań: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań1Miasto Wrocław: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław1Starogardzki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1Siedlecki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.9Tarnowski: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski0.7Kaliski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.6Koniński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.6Rybnicki: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.6Ostrołęcki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.5Pilski: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.5Białostocki: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.4Bydgosko-toruński: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.3Słupski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski0.3Świecki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.3Trójmiejski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.3Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Bielski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.1Szczeciński: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.1Tarnobrzeski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.1Krośnieński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-0.1Legnicko-głogowski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.1Gorzowski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.2Grudziądzki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-0.2Suwalski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSuwalski-0.2Zielonogórski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-0.2Olsztyński: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-0.3Gdański: 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.8Poznański: 4.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański4.8Nowosądecki: 3.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.7Chojnicki: 3.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki3.3Warszawski wschodni: 3 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski wschodni3Leszczyński: 2.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.5Warszawski zachodni: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsWarszawski zachodni2.4Rzeszowski: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski2.3Miasto Kraków: 2.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków2.2Tyski: 2 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2Krakowski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.9Nowotarski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.8Wrocławski: 1.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski1.7Miasto Warszawa: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa1.4Miasto Poznań: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań1Miasto Wrocław: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Wrocław1Starogardzki: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1Siedlecki: 0.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.9Tarnowski: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski0.7Kaliski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.6Koniński: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.6Rybnicki: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.6Ostrołęcki: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.5Pilski: 0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.5Białostocki: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki0.4Bydgosko-toruński: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński0.3Słupski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski0.3Świecki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki0.3Trójmiejski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsTrójmiejski0.3Lubelski: 0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski0.2Bielski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.1Szczeciński: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.1Tarnobrzeski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.1Krośnieński: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński-0.1Legnicko-głogowski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.1Gorzowski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski-0.2Grudziądzki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki-0.2Suwalski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsSuwalski-0.2Zielonogórski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-0.2Olsztyński: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-0.3
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2016
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2015
1Gdański5.8+0.2 pts
2Poznański4.8+0.5 pts
3Nowosądecki3.7+0.2 pts
4Chojnicki3.3+1.3 pts
5Warszawski wschodni3+0.9 pts
6Leszczyński2.5+0.4 pts
7Warszawski zachodni2.4+0.2 pts
8Rzeszowski2.3+1.1 pts
9Miasto Kraków2.2+1.6 pts
10Tyski2+0.2 pts
11Krakowski1.9+0.7 pts
12Nowotarski1.8+0.5 pts
13Wrocławski1.7+1.1 pts
14Miasto Warszawa1.4+0.6 pts
15Miasto Poznań1+1.3 pts
15Miasto Wrocław1+1.7 pts
15Starogardzki1+0.3 pts
18Siedlecki0.9+0.2 pts
19Tarnowski0.7+0.5 pts
20Kaliski0.6+0.8 pts
20Koniński0.6+0.7 pts
20Rybnicki0.6+0.9 pts
23Ostrołęcki0.5+0.2 pts
23Pilski0.5+0.4 pts
25Białostocki0.4+0.6 pts
26Bydgosko-toruński0.3+0.4 pts
26Słupski0.3-0.2 pts
26Świecki0.3-0.2 pts
26Trójmiejski0.3+0.9 pts
30Lubelski0.20 pts
31Bielski0.1+0.1 pts
31Szczeciński0.1+0.5 pts
31Tarnobrzeski0.1+0.1 pts
34Krośnieński-0.1+0.5 pts
34Legnicko-głogowski-0.1+0.3 pts
36Gorzowski-0.2+0.3 pts
36Grudziądzki-0.2+0.3 pts
36Suwalski-0.2+0.4 pts
36Zielonogórski-0.2+0.7 pts
40Olsztyński-0.3+0.4 pts
41Elbląski-0.5+0.1 pts
41Oświęcimski-0.5+0.1 pts
43Bialski-0.6+0.4 pts
43Przemyski-0.6+0.3 pts
43Żyrardowski-0.60 pts
46Ełcki-0.7-0.8 pts
46Inowrocławski-0.7-0.2 pts
46Koszaliński-0.7+0.6 pts
49Opolski-0.8+0.6 pts
50Ciechanowski-0.9+0.3 pts
50Gliwicki-0.9+0.5 pts
52Radomski-1.2+0.2 pts
53Miasto Szczecin-1.4+0.8 pts
53Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-1.40 pts
55Płocki-1.5+0.1 pts
56Puławski-1.6+0.6 pts
57Sieradzki-1.9+0.7 pts
58Piotrkowski-2+0.4 pts
58Włocławski-2+0.6 pts
60Bytomski-2.1+0.8 pts
61Katowicki-2.2+0.9 pts
62Kielecki-2.4+0.1 pts
63Nyski-2.5+1.2 pts
63Skierniewicki-2.5+0.4 pts
65Łódzki-2.60 pts
66Łomżyński-2.7+0.4 pts
67Chełmsko-zamojski-2.90 pts
68Jeleniogórski-3+0.2 pts
69Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-3.2+0.8 pts
70Częstochowski-3.6+0.2 pts
71Sosnowiecki-3.8+0.7 pts
72Wałbrzyski-4.6+0.3 pts
73Miasto Łódź-5.1+1.2 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2016,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2016
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2016.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 5.8 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Miasto Łódź, with -5.1 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings