Data / Rankings / Natural change rate / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate

Gdański had the highest natural change rate of 70 areas in 2013, at 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitants. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -6.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. The median was -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitants and the figure for Poland was -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest5.6Gdański
Lowest-6.5Miasto Łódź
Median-0.270 areas
Poland-0.5History

Top 40 areas, 2013

Gdański: 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.6Nowosądecki: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.6Poznański: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański3.6Chojnicki: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2.7Tyski: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2.4Leszczyński: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.3Rzeszowski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.9Nowotarski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.8Krakowski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.4Starogardzki: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.3Świecki: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki1.3Słupski: 1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1.1Tarnowski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1Krośnieński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.8Pilski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.8Wrocławski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski0.8Koniński: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.7Ostrołęcki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.7Bielski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.6Siedlecki: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.4Tarnobrzeski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.4Kaliski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.3Miasto Kraków: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.3Rybnicki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.3Ełcki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.1Gorzowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.1Grudziądzki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.1Szczeciński: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.1Elbląski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.1Inowrocławski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.1Lubelski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-0.1Przemyski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPrzemyski-0.1Białostocki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-0.2Miasto Poznań: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-0.2Miasto Warszawa: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa-0.2Oświęcimski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-0.2Bydgosko-toruński: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-0.3Legnicko-głogowski: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.3Olsztyński: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-0.5Zielonogórski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-0.5Gdański: 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsGdański5.6Nowosądecki: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowosądecki3.6Poznański: 3.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsPoznański3.6Chojnicki: 2.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsChojnicki2.7Tyski: 2.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTyski2.4Leszczyński: 2.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsLeszczyński2.3Rzeszowski: 1.9 per 1,000 inhabitantsRzeszowski1.9Nowotarski: 1.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsNowotarski1.8Krakowski: 1.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrakowski1.4Starogardzki: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsStarogardzki1.3Świecki: 1.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsŚwiecki1.3Słupski: 1.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSłupski1.1Tarnowski: 1 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnowski1Krośnieński: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsKrośnieński0.8Pilski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsPilski0.8Wrocławski: 0.8 per 1,000 inhabitantsWrocławski0.8Koniński: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsKoniński0.7Ostrołęcki: 0.7 per 1,000 inhabitantsOstrołęcki0.7Bielski: 0.6 per 1,000 inhabitantsBielski0.6Siedlecki: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsSiedlecki0.4Tarnobrzeski: 0.4 per 1,000 inhabitantsTarnobrzeski0.4Kaliski: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsKaliski0.3Miasto Kraków: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Kraków0.3Rybnicki: 0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsRybnicki0.3Ełcki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsEłcki0.1Gorzowski: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGorzowski0.1Grudziądzki: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsGrudziądzki0.1Szczeciński: 0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsSzczeciński0.1Elbląski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsElbląski-0.1Inowrocławski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsInowrocławski-0.1Lubelski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsLubelski-0.1Przemyski: -0.1 per 1,000 inhabitantsPrzemyski-0.1Białostocki: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsBiałostocki-0.2Miasto Poznań: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Poznań-0.2Miasto Warszawa: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsMiasto Warszawa-0.2Oświęcimski: -0.2 per 1,000 inhabitantsOświęcimski-0.2Bydgosko-toruński: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsBydgosko-toruński-0.3Legnicko-głogowski: -0.3 per 1,000 inhabitantsLegnicko-głogowski-0.3Olsztyński: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsOlsztyński-0.5Zielonogórski: -0.5 per 1,000 inhabitantsZielonogórski-0.5
per 1,000 inhabitants. Source: Eurostat, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2013
per 1,000 inhabitants		Change on 2012
1Gdański5.6-0.4 pts
2Nowosądecki3.6-0.4 pts
2Poznański3.6-0.7 pts
4Chojnicki2.7-0.1 pts
5Tyski2.4+0.2 pts
6Leszczyński2.3-0.6 pts
7Rzeszowski1.9n/a
8Nowotarski1.8-0.4 pts
9Krakowski1.4-0.1 pts
10Starogardzki1.3-0.9 pts
10Świecki1.3-0.6 pts
12Słupski1.1+0.1 pts
13Tarnowski1-0.4 pts
14Krośnieński0.8n/a
14Pilski0.8-1 pts
14Wrocławski0.8-0.5 pts
17Koniński0.7-0.7 pts
17Ostrołęcki0.7n/a
19Bielski0.6-0.1 pts
20Siedlecki0.4n/a
20Tarnobrzeski0.4n/a
22Kaliski0.3-0.2 pts
22Miasto Kraków0.3+0.3 pts
22Rybnicki0.3-0.6 pts
25Ełcki0.1-0.6 pts
25Gorzowski0.1-1 pts
25Grudziądzki0.1-0.8 pts
25Szczeciński0.1-0.4 pts
29Elbląski-0.1-0.7 pts
29Inowrocławski-0.1-0.4 pts
29Lubelski-0.1n/a
29Przemyski-0.1n/a
33Białostocki-0.2n/a
33Miasto Poznań-0.2-0.4 pts
33Miasto Warszawa-0.2-0.4 pts
33Oświęcimski-0.2-0.1 pts
37Bydgosko-toruński-0.3-0.5 pts
37Legnicko-głogowski-0.3-0.7 pts
39Olsztyński-0.5-1.2 pts
39Zielonogórski-0.5-1 pts
41Miasto Wrocław-0.7-0.1 pts
42Koszaliński-0.8-1 pts
43Płocki-0.9n/a
43Trójmiejski-0.9-0.2 pts
45Gliwicki-1-0.4 pts
45Suwalski-1n/a
47Radomski-1.1n/a
47Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-1.1-0.8 pts
49Bialski-1.5n/a
49Ciechanowski-1.5n/a
49Opolski-1.5-0.5 pts
52Bytomski-1.7-0.4 pts
52Puławski-1.7n/a
54Włocławski-1.8-0.1 pts
55Piotrkowski-1.9n/a
56Sieradzki-2n/a
57Kielecki-2.1n/a
58Miasto Szczecin-2.2-0.5 pts
59Skierniewicki-2.6n/a
60Chełmsko-zamojski-2.7n/a
60Katowicki-2.7-0.4 pts
62Łomżyński-2.9n/a
63Nyski-3.1-1.3 pts
64Częstochowski-3.2-0.7 pts
64Jeleniogórski-3.2-1 pts
64Łódzki-3.2n/a
67Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-3.8n/a
68Sosnowiecki-4.1-0.8 pts
69Wałbrzyski-4.2-0.6 pts
70Miasto Łódź-6.5n/a

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year per 1,000 average residents (Eurostat crude rate of natural change).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. 3 areas with data in other periods have no value for 2013 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2013,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate, 2013
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-change-rate/poland-provinces?period=2013.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural change rate using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change_rate","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change_rate&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural change rate?

Gdański, with 5.6 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2013, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural change rate?

Miasto Łódź, with -6.5 per 1,000 inhabitants in 2013.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, crude rate of natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12. 3 areas have no value for 2013 and are not ranked.

Natural change rate: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings