NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2019, at €41,100. Przemyski had the lowest, at €7,400. The median was €11,100 and the figure for Poland was €14,190. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest41,100Miasto Warszawa
Lowest7,400Przemyski
Median11,10073 areas
Poland14,190History

Top 40 areas, 2019

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 41,100 EUR41,100Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 27,900 EUR27,900Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 24,500 EUR24,500Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 23,600 EUR23,600PłockiPłocki: 22,300 EUR22,300TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 20,900 EUR20,900Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 20,200 EUR20,200KatowickiKatowicki: 18,700 EUR18,700Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 18,000 EUR18,000Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 17,700 EUR17,700GliwickiGliwicki: 16,900 EUR16,900PoznańskiPoznański: 16,900 EUR16,900Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 16,500 EUR16,500TyskiTyski: 16,400 EUR16,400BielskiBielski: 14,400 EUR14,400WrocławskiWrocławski: 14,200 EUR14,200Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 14,000 EUR14,000OpolskiOpolski: 13,400 EUR13,400PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 13,300 EUR13,300SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 13,000 EUR13,000LubelskiLubelski: 12,800 EUR12,800KaliskiKaliski: 12,700 EUR12,700ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 12,700 EUR12,700LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 12,600 EUR12,600RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 12,600 EUR12,600CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 12,500 EUR12,500RybnickiRybnicki: 12,400 EUR12,400ŁódzkiŁódzki: 12,000 EUR12,000Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 11,900 EUR11,900BiałostockiBiałostocki: 11,800 EUR11,800KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 11,600 EUR11,600ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 11,600 EUR11,600GorzowskiGorzowski: 11,400 EUR11,400KonińskiKoniński: 11,300 EUR11,300CiechanowskiCiechanowski: 11,100 EUR11,100KieleckiKielecki: 11,100 EUR11,100SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 11,100 EUR11,100ŚwieckiŚwiecki: 11,000 EUR11,000OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 10,900 EUR10,900OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 10,900 EUR10,900
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2019
EUR
Change on 2018
1Miasto Warszawa41,100+7.3%
2Miasto Poznań27,900+9.8%
3Miasto Wrocław24,500+9.4%
4Miasto Kraków23,600+6.3%
5Płocki22,300+13.8%
6Trójmiejski20,900+7.2%
7Warszawski zachodni20,200+8%
8Katowicki18,700+6.9%
9Miasto Łódź18,000+8.4%
10Legnicko-głogowski17,700+7.3%
11Gliwicki16,900+8.3%
11Poznański16,900+5.6%
13Miasto Szczecin16,500+5.1%
14Tyski16,400+1.2%
15Bielski14,400+5.9%
16Wrocławski14,200+4.4%
17Bydgosko-toruński14,000+4.5%
18Opolski13,400+6.3%
19Piotrkowski13,300+6.4%
20Sosnowiecki13,000+3.2%
21Lubelski12,800+6.7%
22Kaliski12,700+5.8%
22Żyrardowski12,700+7.6%
24Leszczyński12,600+6.8%
24Rzeszowski12,600+6.8%
26Częstochowski12,500+7.8%
27Rybnicki12,400+5.1%
28Łódzki12,000+8.1%
29Warszawski wschodni11,900+6.3%
30Białostocki11,800+7.3%
31Koszaliński11,600+6.4%
31Zielonogórski11,600+4.5%
33Gorzowski11,400+6.5%
34Koniński11,300+9.7%
35Ciechanowski11,100+8.8%
35Kielecki11,100+4.7%
35Szczeciński11,100+6.7%
38Świecki11,000-3.5%
39Olsztyński10,900+6.9%
39Ostrołęcki10,900+4.8%
39Siedlecki10,900+6.9%
42Jeleniogórski10,800+4.9%
42Krakowski10,800+4.9%
44Starogardzki10,700+9.2%
45Tarnobrzeski10,600+7.1%
46Pilski10,500+4%
46Słupski10,500+5%
48Bytomski10,400+5.1%
48Oświęcimski10,400+5.1%
50Gdański10,300+5.1%
51Skierniewicki10,200+8.5%
51Wałbrzyski10,200+6.3%
53Radomski10,100+8.6%
54Sieradzki10,000+9.9%
55Łomżyński9,900+8.8%
56Grudziądzki9,600+6.7%
57Elbląski9,300+4.5%
57Włocławski9,300+6.9%
59Inowrocławski9,200+5.7%
59Suwalski9,200+5.7%
61Chojnicki9,100+4.6%
61Nowosądecki9,100+5.8%
61Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski9,100+7.1%
61Tarnowski9,100+5.8%
65Puławski9,000+9.8%
66Bialski8,600+4.9%
66Nyski8,600+7.5%
68Nowotarski8,400+5%
69Krośnieński8,300+6.4%
69Szczecinecko-pyrzycki8,300+5.1%
71Ełcki8,100+5.2%
72Chełmsko-zamojski7,600+8.6%
73Przemyski7,400+5.7%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €41,100 in 2019, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €7,400 in 2019.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings