NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros), 2023

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2023, at €55,100. Przemyski had the lowest, at €10,300. The median was €15,600 and the figure for Poland was €19,980. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest55,100Miasto Warszawa
Lowest10,300Przemyski
Median15,60073 areas
Poland19,980History

Top 40 areas, 2023

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 55,100 EUR55,100Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 38,700 EUR38,700Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 31,800 EUR31,800PłockiPłocki: 31,500 EUR31,500Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 30,200 EUR30,200TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 30,100 EUR30,100KatowickiKatowicki: 27,900 EUR27,900GliwickiGliwicki: 26,100 EUR26,100Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 25,300 EUR25,300TyskiTyski: 24,400 EUR24,400Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 24,300 EUR24,300Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 23,200 EUR23,200Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 22,700 EUR22,700WrocławskiWrocławski: 21,400 EUR21,400PoznańskiPoznański: 21,200 EUR21,200Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 19,600 EUR19,600PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 19,400 EUR19,400BielskiBielski: 18,700 EUR18,700OpolskiOpolski: 18,200 EUR18,200RybnickiRybnicki: 18,200 EUR18,200KaliskiKaliski: 17,700 EUR17,700LubelskiLubelski: 17,700 EUR17,700RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 17,400 EUR17,400SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 17,400 EUR17,400CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 17,300 EUR17,300LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 17,300 EUR17,300ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 17,200 EUR17,200BiałostockiBiałostocki: 17,100 EUR17,100ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 16,300 EUR16,300KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 16,100 EUR16,100ŁódzkiŁódzki: 16,100 EUR16,100SiedleckiSiedlecki: 16,000 EUR16,000CiechanowskiCiechanowski: 15,900 EUR15,900OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 15,800 EUR15,800JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 15,700 EUR15,700RadomskiRadomski: 15,700 EUR15,700OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 15,600 EUR15,600KieleckiKielecki: 15,500 EUR15,500KonińskiKoniński: 15,400 EUR15,400GorzowskiGorzowski: 15,300 EUR15,300
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2023
EUR
Change on 2022
1Miasto Warszawa55,100+18.5%
2Miasto Poznań38,700+16.9%
3Miasto Kraków31,800+14.4%
4Płocki31,500-9.5%
5Miasto Wrocław30,200+14%
6Trójmiejski30,100+6.7%
7Katowicki27,900+13.9%
8Gliwicki26,100+16%
9Miasto Łódź25,300+16.6%
10Tyski24,400+11.4%
11Warszawski zachodni24,300+18%
12Legnicko-głogowski23,200+6.4%
13Miasto Szczecin22,700+16.4%
14Wrocławski21,400+11.5%
15Poznański21,200+13.4%
16Bydgosko-toruński19,600+14%
17Piotrkowski19,400+14.8%
18Bielski18,700+14.7%
19Opolski18,200+11.7%
19Rybnicki18,200+11%
21Kaliski17,700+15.7%
21Lubelski17,700+14.2%
23Rzeszowski17,400+16%
23Sosnowiecki17,400+5.5%
25Częstochowski17,300+10.9%
25Leszczyński17,300+14.6%
27Żyrardowski17,200+15.4%
28Białostocki17,100+14%
29Zielonogórski16,300+10.9%
30Koszaliński16,100+15%
30Łódzki16,100+11.8%
32Siedlecki16,000+19.4%
33Ciechanowski15,900+13.6%
34Olsztyński15,800+13.7%
35Jeleniogórski15,700+18%
35Radomski15,700+27.6%
37Ostrołęcki15,600+9.9%
38Kielecki15,500+14%
39Koniński15,400+14.9%
40Gorzowski15,300+12.5%
40Tarnobrzeski15,300+14.2%
42Warszawski wschodni15,200+16.9%
43Oświęcimski14,800+12.1%
43Słupski14,800+20.3%
45Skierniewicki14,700+14.8%
45Szczeciński14,700+11.4%
47Pilski14,600+9.8%
47Sieradzki14,600+14.1%
49Grudziądzki14,400+9.1%
49Starogardzki14,400+7.5%
51Bytomski14,300+17.2%
51Krakowski14,300+17.2%
51Łomżyński14,300+12.6%
54Wałbrzyski14,200+14.5%
55Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski14,100+22.6%
56Świecki13,900-2.8%
57Suwalski13,700+14.2%
58Elbląski13,500+14.4%
58Inowrocławski13,500+12.5%
60Włocławski13,300+5.6%
61Gdański13,100+18%
62Chojnicki12,800+16.4%
63Bialski12,700+12.4%
63Nowosądecki12,700+16.5%
65Nyski12,500+15.7%
66Szczecinecko-pyrzycki12,200+13%
67Tarnowski12,100+11%
68Krośnieński11,900+15.5%
69Puławski11,800+3.5%
70Nowotarski11,600+16%
71Ełcki11,500+9.5%
72Chełmsko-zamojski11,000+17%
73Przemyski10,300+13.2%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €55,100 in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €10,300 in 2023.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings