NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros), 2015
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2015, at €32,100. Przemyski had the lowest, at €6,000. The median was €9,100 and the figure for Poland was €11,390. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest32,100Miasto Warszawa

Lowest6,000Przemyski

Median9,10073 areas

Poland11,390History

Top 40 areas, 2015

CSV Chart (SVG)

EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2015 EUR	Change on 2014
1	Miasto Warszawa	32,100	+4.9%
2	Miasto Poznań	21,800	+5.3%
3	Miasto Wrocław	18,500	+6.9%
4	Miasto Kraków	18,200	+7.7%
5	Płocki	17,000	+14.1%
6	Legnicko-głogowski	16,400	+3.1%
6	Warszawski zachodni	16,400	+7.9%
8	Trójmiejski	15,800	+9%
9	Katowicki	14,900	+4.9%
10	Tyski	14,300	+3.6%
11	Miasto Łódź	13,900	+6.1%
12	Poznański	13,800	+7%
13	Gliwicki	13,600	+5.4%
14	Miasto Szczecin	13,500	+7.1%
15	Bielski	12,000	+10.1%
16	Bydgosko-toruński	11,700	+7.3%
17	Wrocławski	11,600	+9.4%
18	Opolski	11,000	+5.8%
18	Piotrkowski	11,000	+5.8%
20	Żyrardowski	10,800	+8%
21	Sosnowiecki	10,600	+6%
22	Kaliski	10,400	+10.6%
23	Lubelski	10,300	+3%
24	Leszczyński	10,200	+5.2%
24	Rzeszowski	10,200	+8.5%
26	Rybnicki	10,000	+5.3%
26	Warszawski wschodni	10,000	+7.5%
28	Łódzki	9,900	+7.6%
29	Częstochowski	9,800	+6.5%
30	Zielonogórski	9,600	+4.3%
31	Białostocki	9,500	+4.4%
31	Gorzowski	9,500	+4.4%
31	Koszaliński	9,500	+6.7%
34	Jeleniogórski	9,200	0%
34	Olsztyński	9,200	+4.5%
36	Kielecki	9,100	+5.8%
36	Starogardzki	9,100	+4.6%
36	Szczeciński	9,100	+7.1%
39	Pilski	8,900	+8.5%
39	Siedlecki	8,900	+2.3%
41	Ostrołęcki	8,800	+4.8%
41	Oświęcimski	8,800	+7.3%
43	Koniński	8,700	+6.1%
44	Słupski	8,600	+3.6%
45	Gdański	8,500	+6.3%
45	Krakowski	8,500	+9%
45	Świecki	8,500	+2.4%
45	Tarnobrzeski	8,500	+6.3%
49	Bytomski	8,400	+6.3%
49	Ciechanowski	8,400	+2.4%
49	Wałbrzyski	8,400	+5%
52	Radomski	8,200	+5.1%
52	Skierniewicki	8,200	+2.5%
54	Włocławski	8,100	+9.5%
55	Sieradzki	8,000	+5.3%
56	Elbląski	7,800	+5.4%
57	Łomżyński	7,700	+2.7%
58	Grudziądzki	7,600	+4.1%
58	Tarnowski	7,600	+5.6%
60	Inowrocławski	7,500	+2.7%
61	Puławski	7,400	+8.8%
61	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	7,400	+4.2%
61	Suwalski	7,400	+2.8%
64	Chojnicki	7,300	+2.8%
64	Nowosądecki	7,300	+5.8%
66	Nyski	7,000	+2.9%
66	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	7,000	+4.5%
68	Bialski	6,900	+3%
69	Krośnieński	6,800	+3%
70	Ełcki	6,700	+3.1%
70	Nowotarski	6,700	+6.3%
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	6,200	+3.3%
73	Przemyski	6,000	+3.4%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €32,100 in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €6,000 in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.