Data / Rankings / GDP per capita / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2012, at €29,300. Przemyski had the lowest, at €5,500. The median was €8,200 and the figure for Poland was €10,190. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest29,300Miasto Warszawa
Lowest5,500Przemyski
Median8,20073 areas
Poland10,190History

Top 40 areas, 2012

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 29,300 EUR29,300Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 19,500 EUR19,500Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 17,500 EUR17,500Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 15,600 EUR15,600Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 15,600 EUR15,600PłockiPłocki: 15,500 EUR15,500TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 14,900 EUR14,900TyskiTyski: 14,500 EUR14,500Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 14,300 EUR14,300KatowickiKatowicki: 13,600 EUR13,600Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 12,200 EUR12,200GliwickiGliwicki: 12,100 EUR12,100PoznańskiPoznański: 12,000 EUR12,000Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 11,900 EUR11,900Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 10,600 EUR10,600BielskiBielski: 10,100 EUR10,100PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 10,100 EUR10,100WrocławskiWrocławski: 10,000 EUR10,000OpolskiOpolski: 9,700 EUR9,700RybnickiRybnicki: 9,700 EUR9,700ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 9,600 EUR9,600SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 9,500 EUR9,500LubelskiLubelski: 9,300 EUR9,300LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 8,900 EUR8,900RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 8,900 EUR8,900BiałostockiBiałostocki: 8,700 EUR8,700CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 8,600 EUR8,600GorzowskiGorzowski: 8,600 EUR8,600JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 8,600 EUR8,600KaliskiKaliski: 8,600 EUR8,600ŁódzkiŁódzki: 8,600 EUR8,600Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 8,600 EUR8,600KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 8,500 EUR8,500ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 8,500 EUR8,500KieleckiKielecki: 8,300 EUR8,300OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 8,200 EUR8,200SiedleckiSiedlecki: 8,200 EUR8,200SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 8,100 EUR8,100StarogardzkiStarogardzki: 8,000 EUR8,000KonińskiKoniński: 7,900 EUR7,900
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2012
EUR		Change on 2011
1Miasto Warszawa29,300+3.5%
2Miasto Poznań19,500+3.7%
3Legnicko-głogowski17,500-5.9%
4Miasto Kraków15,600+2%
4Miasto Wrocław15,600+3.3%
6Płocki15,500+3.3%
7Trójmiejski14,900+5.7%
8Tyski14,500-2.7%
9Warszawski zachodni14,300+2.1%
10Katowicki13,600+0.7%
11Miasto Łódź12,200+2.5%
12Gliwicki12,100+4.3%
13Poznański12,000+1.7%
14Miasto Szczecin11,900+1.7%
15Bydgosko-toruński10,600+2.9%
16Bielski10,100+3.1%
16Piotrkowski10,100+4.1%
18Wrocławski10,000+6.4%
19Opolski9,700+1%
19Rybnicki9,700-2%
21Żyrardowski9,600+5.5%
22Sosnowiecki9,500+1.1%
23Lubelski9,300+6.9%
24Leszczyński8,900+3.5%
24Rzeszowski8,900+6%
26Białostocki8,700+2.4%
27Częstochowski8,600+1.2%
27Gorzowski8,600+3.6%
27Jeleniogórski8,600+7.5%
27Kaliski8,600+4.9%
27Łódzki8,600+2.4%
27Warszawski wschodni8,6000%
33Koszaliński8,500+2.4%
33Zielonogórski8,500+1.2%
35Kielecki8,3000%
36Olsztyński8,200+1.2%
36Siedlecki8,200+1.2%
38Szczeciński8,100+3.8%
39Starogardzki8,000+1.3%
40Koniński7,900+1.3%
40Oświęcimski7,9000%
42Pilski7,700+1.3%
42Słupski7,700+1.3%
44Bytomski7,500-1.3%
44Ciechanowski7,500-1.3%
44Ostrołęcki7,500+1.4%
44Skierniewicki7,500+2.7%
48Tarnobrzeski7,4000%
48Wałbrzyski7,4000%
50Krakowski7,300+2.8%
51Gdański7,200+4.3%
51Radomski7,200+1.4%
51Świecki7,200-1.4%
51Tarnowski7,2000%
55Sieradzki7,100+2.9%
56Elbląski7,000+1.4%
56Włocławski7,0000%
58Inowrocławski6,900-1.4%
59Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski6,800-1.4%
60Grudziądzki6,700+3.1%
60Łomżyński6,700-2.9%
60Suwalski6,700-1.5%
63Chojnicki6,6000%
63Puławski6,600+1.5%
65Nyski6,500+1.6%
66Bialski6,3000%
66Nowosądecki6,3000%
68Ełcki6,200+1.6%
68Krośnieński6,2000%
68Szczecinecko-pyrzycki6,2000%
71Nowotarski5,900+1.7%
72Chełmsko-zamojski5,800-1.7%
73Przemyski5,5000%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €29,300 in 2012, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €5,500 in 2012.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings