Data / Rankings / GDP per capita / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2013, at €29,900. Przemyski had the lowest, at €5,500. The median was €8,300 and the figure for Poland was €10,260. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest29,900Miasto Warszawa
Lowest5,500Przemyski
Median8,30073 areas
Poland10,260History

Top 40 areas, 2013

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 29,900 EUR29,900Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 20,200 EUR20,200Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 16,300 EUR16,300Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 16,200 EUR16,200Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 15,800 EUR15,800TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 14,500 EUR14,500Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 14,200 EUR14,200PłockiPłocki: 14,000 EUR14,000KatowickiKatowicki: 13,900 EUR13,900TyskiTyski: 13,600 EUR13,600Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 12,400 EUR12,400PoznańskiPoznański: 12,200 EUR12,200GliwickiGliwicki: 12,100 EUR12,100Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 11,900 EUR11,900Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 10,500 EUR10,500WrocławskiWrocławski: 10,200 EUR10,200BielskiBielski: 10,100 EUR10,100PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 10,000 EUR10,000OpolskiOpolski: 9,800 EUR9,800ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 9,800 EUR9,800LubelskiLubelski: 9,600 EUR9,600SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 9,300 EUR9,300RybnickiRybnicki: 9,200 EUR9,200LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 9,100 EUR9,100RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 9,100 EUR9,100BiałostockiBiałostocki: 8,800 EUR8,800CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 8,700 EUR8,700KaliskiKaliski: 8,700 EUR8,700Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 8,700 EUR8,700ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 8,700 EUR8,700JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 8,600 EUR8,600KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 8,600 EUR8,600ŁódzkiŁódzki: 8,600 EUR8,600GorzowskiGorzowski: 8,500 EUR8,500OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 8,400 EUR8,400SiedleckiSiedlecki: 8,400 EUR8,400KieleckiKielecki: 8,300 EUR8,300StarogardzkiStarogardzki: 8,000 EUR8,000SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 8,000 EUR8,000KonińskiKoniński: 7,900 EUR7,900
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2013
EUR		Change on 2012
1Miasto Warszawa29,900+2%
2Miasto Poznań20,200+3.6%
3Miasto Wrocław16,300+4.5%
4Miasto Kraków16,200+3.8%
5Legnicko-głogowski15,800-9.7%
6Trójmiejski14,500-2.7%
7Warszawski zachodni14,200-0.7%
8Płocki14,000-9.7%
9Katowicki13,900+2.2%
10Tyski13,600-6.2%
11Miasto Łódź12,400+1.6%
12Poznański12,200+1.7%
13Gliwicki12,1000%
14Miasto Szczecin11,9000%
15Bydgosko-toruński10,500-0.9%
16Wrocławski10,200+2%
17Bielski10,1000%
18Piotrkowski10,000-1%
19Opolski9,800+1%
19Żyrardowski9,800+2.1%
21Lubelski9,600+3.2%
22Sosnowiecki9,300-2.1%
23Rybnicki9,200-5.2%
24Leszczyński9,100+2.2%
24Rzeszowski9,100+2.2%
26Białostocki8,800+1.1%
27Częstochowski8,700+1.2%
27Kaliski8,700+1.2%
27Warszawski wschodni8,700+1.2%
27Zielonogórski8,700+2.4%
31Jeleniogórski8,6000%
31Koszaliński8,600+1.2%
31Łódzki8,6000%
34Gorzowski8,500-1.2%
35Olsztyński8,400+2.4%
35Siedlecki8,400+2.4%
37Kielecki8,3000%
38Starogardzki8,0000%
38Szczeciński8,000-1.2%
40Koniński7,9000%
41Ciechanowski7,800+4%
41Ostrołęcki7,800+4%
41Oświęcimski7,800-1.3%
41Pilski7,800+1.3%
45Skierniewicki7,700+2.7%
45Słupski7,7000%
45Tarnobrzeski7,700+4.1%
48Bytomski7,600+1.3%
48Świecki7,600+5.6%
50Gdański7,400+2.8%
50Wałbrzyski7,4000%
50Włocławski7,400+5.7%
53Krakowski7,3000%
53Radomski7,300+1.4%
55Sieradzki7,200+1.4%
56Łomżyński7,100+6%
57Grudziądzki7,000+4.5%
57Inowrocławski7,000+1.4%
59Elbląski6,900-1.4%
59Suwalski6,900+3%
59Tarnowski6,900-4.2%
62Puławski6,6000%
62Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski6,600-2.9%
64Bialski6,500+3.2%
64Chojnicki6,500-1.5%
64Nyski6,5000%
67Krośnieński6,300+1.6%
67Nowosądecki6,3000%
67Szczecinecko-pyrzycki6,300+1.6%
70Ełcki6,2000%
71Nowotarski5,9000%
72Chełmsko-zamojski5,8000%
73Przemyski5,5000%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €29,900 in 2013, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €5,500 in 2013.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings