NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2017, at €35,300. Przemyski had the lowest, at €6,500. The median was €9,700 and the figure for Poland was €12,360. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest35,300Miasto Warszawa
Lowest6,500Przemyski
Median9,70073 areas
Poland12,360History

Top 40 areas, 2017

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 35,300 EUR35,300Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 24,000 EUR24,000Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 20,500 EUR20,500Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 20,300 EUR20,300PłockiPłocki: 18,400 EUR18,400TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 17,500 EUR17,500Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 17,100 EUR17,100Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 16,600 EUR16,600KatowickiKatowicki: 15,900 EUR15,900TyskiTyski: 15,700 EUR15,700PoznańskiPoznański: 15,200 EUR15,200Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 15,000 EUR15,000GliwickiGliwicki: 14,600 EUR14,600Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 14,400 EUR14,400BielskiBielski: 12,800 EUR12,800WrocławskiWrocławski: 12,700 EUR12,700Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 12,400 EUR12,400OpolskiOpolski: 11,700 EUR11,700PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 11,700 EUR11,700SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 11,500 EUR11,500LubelskiLubelski: 11,300 EUR11,300ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 11,300 EUR11,300KaliskiKaliski: 11,200 EUR11,200LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 11,200 EUR11,200CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 10,900 EUR10,900RybnickiRybnicki: 10,900 EUR10,900RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 10,800 EUR10,800Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 10,500 EUR10,500ŁódzkiŁódzki: 10,400 EUR10,400ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 10,400 EUR10,400BiałostockiBiałostocki: 10,200 EUR10,200KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 10,200 EUR10,200GorzowskiGorzowski: 10,100 EUR10,100KieleckiKielecki: 9,800 EUR9,800JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 9,700 EUR9,700KonińskiKoniński: 9,700 EUR9,700OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 9,700 EUR9,700OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 9,700 EUR9,700SiedleckiSiedlecki: 9,700 EUR9,700SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 9,700 EUR9,700
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2017
EUR
Change on 2016
1Miasto Warszawa35,300+11.7%
2Miasto Poznań24,000+10.6%
3Miasto Wrocław20,500+12%
4Miasto Kraków20,300+10.9%
5Płocki18,400+3.4%
6Trójmiejski17,500+9.4%
7Warszawski zachodni17,100+6.2%
8Legnicko-głogowski16,600+8.5%
9Katowicki15,900+10.4%
10Tyski15,700+10.6%
11Poznański15,200+8.6%
12Miasto Łódź15,000+11.9%
13Gliwicki14,600+5.8%
14Miasto Szczecin14,400+10.8%
15Bielski12,800+7.6%
16Wrocławski12,700+7.6%
17Bydgosko-toruński12,400+7.8%
18Opolski11,700+9.3%
18Piotrkowski11,700+7.3%
20Sosnowiecki11,500+7.5%
21Lubelski11,300+9.7%
21Żyrardowski11,300+7.6%
23Kaliski11,200+9.8%
23Leszczyński11,200+9.8%
25Częstochowski10,900+10.1%
25Rybnicki10,900+13.5%
27Rzeszowski10,800+9.1%
28Warszawski wschodni10,500+9.4%
29Łódzki10,400+7.2%
29Zielonogórski10,400+8.3%
31Białostocki10,200+9.7%
31Koszaliński10,200+9.7%
33Gorzowski10,100+7.4%
34Kielecki9,800+10.1%
35Jeleniogórski9,700+7.8%
35Koniński9,700+11.5%
35Olsztyński9,700+6.6%
35Ostrołęcki9,700+14.1%
35Siedlecki9,700+10.2%
35Szczeciński9,700+7.8%
41Ciechanowski9,600+14.3%
41Świecki9,600+14.3%
43Krakowski9,500+10.5%
43Oświęcimski9,500+9.2%
43Starogardzki9,500+4.4%
46Pilski9,400+8%
46Słupski9,400+13.3%
48Bytomski9,100+11%
48Gdański9,100+9.6%
48Skierniewicki9,100+9.6%
48Tarnobrzeski9,100+7.1%
48Wałbrzyski9,100+8.3%
53Sieradzki8,900+11.3%
54Radomski8,800+11.4%
55Łomżyński8,600+13.2%
56Elbląski8,500+10.4%
57Grudziądzki8,400+9.1%
57Włocławski8,400+6.3%
59Inowrocławski8,200+7.9%
60Chojnicki8,100+8%
60Suwalski8,100+11%
60Tarnowski8,100+9.5%
63Puławski7,900+9.7%
64Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski7,800+8.3%
65Nowosądecki7,700+10%
66Bialski7,600+10.1%
66Nyski7,600+8.6%
66Szczecinecko-pyrzycki7,600+8.6%
69Ełcki7,400+8.8%
69Nowotarski7,400+10.4%
71Krośnieński7,300+10.6%
72Chełmsko-zamojski6,900+11.3%
73Przemyski6,500+8.3%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €35,300 in 2017, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €6,500 in 2017.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings