Data / Rankings / GDP per capita / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2016, at €31,600. Przemyski had the lowest, at €6,000. The median was €9,000 and the figure for Poland was €11,270. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest31,600Miasto Warszawa
Lowest6,000Przemyski
Median9,00073 areas
Poland11,270History

Top 40 areas, 2016

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 31,600 EUR31,600Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 21,700 EUR21,700Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 18,300 EUR18,300Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 18,300 EUR18,300PłockiPłocki: 17,800 EUR17,800Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 16,100 EUR16,100TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 16,000 EUR16,000Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 15,300 EUR15,300KatowickiKatowicki: 14,400 EUR14,400TyskiTyski: 14,200 EUR14,200PoznańskiPoznański: 14,000 EUR14,000GliwickiGliwicki: 13,800 EUR13,800Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 13,400 EUR13,400Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 13,000 EUR13,000BielskiBielski: 11,900 EUR11,900WrocławskiWrocławski: 11,800 EUR11,800Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 11,500 EUR11,500PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 10,900 EUR10,900OpolskiOpolski: 10,700 EUR10,700SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 10,700 EUR10,700ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 10,500 EUR10,500LubelskiLubelski: 10,300 EUR10,300KaliskiKaliski: 10,200 EUR10,200LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 10,200 EUR10,200CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 9,900 EUR9,900RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 9,900 EUR9,900ŁódzkiŁódzki: 9,700 EUR9,700RybnickiRybnicki: 9,600 EUR9,600Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 9,600 EUR9,600ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 9,600 EUR9,600GorzowskiGorzowski: 9,400 EUR9,400BiałostockiBiałostocki: 9,300 EUR9,300KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 9,300 EUR9,300OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 9,100 EUR9,100StarogardzkiStarogardzki: 9,100 EUR9,100JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 9,000 EUR9,000SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 9,000 EUR9,000KieleckiKielecki: 8,900 EUR8,900SiedleckiSiedlecki: 8,800 EUR8,800KonińskiKoniński: 8,700 EUR8,700
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2016
EUR		Change on 2015
1Miasto Warszawa31,600-1.6%
2Miasto Poznań21,700-0.5%
3Miasto Kraków18,300+0.5%
3Miasto Wrocław18,300-1.1%
5Płocki17,800+4.7%
6Warszawski zachodni16,100-1.8%
7Trójmiejski16,000+1.3%
8Legnicko-głogowski15,300-6.7%
9Katowicki14,400-3.4%
10Tyski14,200-0.7%
11Poznański14,000+1.4%
12Gliwicki13,800+1.5%
13Miasto Łódź13,400-3.6%
14Miasto Szczecin13,000-3.7%
15Bielski11,900-0.8%
16Wrocławski11,800+1.7%
17Bydgosko-toruński11,500-1.7%
18Piotrkowski10,900-0.9%
19Opolski10,700-2.7%
19Sosnowiecki10,700+0.9%
21Żyrardowski10,500-2.8%
22Lubelski10,3000%
23Kaliski10,200-1.9%
23Leszczyński10,2000%
25Częstochowski9,900+1%
25Rzeszowski9,900-2.9%
27Łódzki9,700-2%
28Rybnicki9,600-4%
28Warszawski wschodni9,600-4%
28Zielonogórski9,6000%
31Gorzowski9,400-1.1%
32Białostocki9,300-2.1%
32Koszaliński9,300-2.1%
34Olsztyński9,100-1.1%
34Starogardzki9,1000%
36Jeleniogórski9,000-2.2%
36Szczeciński9,000-1.1%
38Kielecki8,900-2.2%
39Siedlecki8,800-1.1%
40Koniński8,7000%
40Oświęcimski8,700-1.1%
40Pilski8,700-2.2%
43Krakowski8,600+1.2%
44Ostrołęcki8,500-3.4%
44Tarnobrzeski8,5000%
46Ciechanowski8,4000%
46Świecki8,400-1.2%
46Wałbrzyski8,4000%
49Gdański8,300-2.4%
49Skierniewicki8,300+1.2%
49Słupski8,300-3.5%
52Bytomski8,200-2.4%
53Sieradzki8,0000%
54Radomski7,900-3.7%
54Włocławski7,900-2.5%
56Elbląski7,700-1.3%
56Grudziądzki7,700+1.3%
58Inowrocławski7,600+1.3%
58Łomżyński7,600-1.3%
60Chojnicki7,500+2.7%
61Tarnowski7,400-2.6%
62Suwalski7,300-1.4%
63Puławski7,200-2.7%
63Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski7,200-2.7%
65Nowosądecki7,000-4.1%
65Nyski7,0000%
65Szczecinecko-pyrzycki7,0000%
68Bialski6,9000%
69Ełcki6,800+1.5%
70Nowotarski6,7000%
71Krośnieński6,600-2.9%
72Chełmsko-zamojski6,2000%
73Przemyski6,0000%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €31,600 in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €6,000 in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings