Data / Rankings / GDP per capita / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita (euros) of 73 areas in 2014, at €30,600. Przemyski had the lowest, at €5,800. The median was €8,700 and the figure for Poland was €10,750. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest30,600Miasto Warszawa
Lowest5,800Przemyski
Median8,70073 areas
Poland10,750History

Top 40 areas, 2014

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 30,600 EUR30,600Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 20,700 EUR20,700Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 17,300 EUR17,300Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 16,900 EUR16,900Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 15,900 EUR15,900Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 15,200 EUR15,200PłockiPłocki: 14,900 EUR14,900TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 14,500 EUR14,500KatowickiKatowicki: 14,200 EUR14,200TyskiTyski: 13,800 EUR13,800Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 13,100 EUR13,100GliwickiGliwicki: 12,900 EUR12,900PoznańskiPoznański: 12,900 EUR12,900Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 12,600 EUR12,600BielskiBielski: 10,900 EUR10,900Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 10,900 EUR10,900WrocławskiWrocławski: 10,600 EUR10,600OpolskiOpolski: 10,400 EUR10,400PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 10,400 EUR10,400LubelskiLubelski: 10,000 EUR10,000SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 10,000 EUR10,000ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 10,000 EUR10,000LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 9,700 EUR9,700RybnickiRybnicki: 9,500 EUR9,500KaliskiKaliski: 9,400 EUR9,400RzeszowskiRzeszowski: 9,400 EUR9,400Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 9,300 EUR9,300CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 9,200 EUR9,200JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 9,200 EUR9,200ŁódzkiŁódzki: 9,200 EUR9,200ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 9,200 EUR9,200BiałostockiBiałostocki: 9,100 EUR9,100GorzowskiGorzowski: 9,100 EUR9,100KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 8,900 EUR8,900OlsztyńskiOlsztyński: 8,800 EUR8,800SiedleckiSiedlecki: 8,700 EUR8,700StarogardzkiStarogardzki: 8,700 EUR8,700KieleckiKielecki: 8,600 EUR8,600SzczecińskiSzczeciński: 8,500 EUR8,500OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 8,400 EUR8,400
EUR. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

RankAreas2014
EUR		Change on 2013
1Miasto Warszawa30,600+2.3%
2Miasto Poznań20,700+2.5%
3Miasto Wrocław17,300+6.1%
4Miasto Kraków16,900+4.3%
5Legnicko-głogowski15,900+0.6%
6Warszawski zachodni15,200+7%
7Płocki14,900+6.4%
8Trójmiejski14,5000%
9Katowicki14,200+2.2%
10Tyski13,800+1.5%
11Miasto Łódź13,100+5.6%
12Gliwicki12,900+6.6%
12Poznański12,900+5.7%
14Miasto Szczecin12,600+5.9%
15Bielski10,900+7.9%
15Bydgosko-toruński10,900+3.8%
17Wrocławski10,600+3.9%
18Opolski10,400+6.1%
18Piotrkowski10,400+4%
20Lubelski10,000+4.2%
20Sosnowiecki10,000+7.5%
20Żyrardowski10,000+2%
23Leszczyński9,700+6.6%
24Rybnicki9,500+3.3%
25Kaliski9,400+8%
25Rzeszowski9,400+3.3%
27Warszawski wschodni9,300+6.9%
28Częstochowski9,200+5.7%
28Jeleniogórski9,200+7%
28Łódzki9,200+7%
28Zielonogórski9,200+5.7%
32Białostocki9,100+3.4%
32Gorzowski9,100+7.1%
34Koszaliński8,900+3.5%
35Olsztyński8,800+4.8%
36Siedlecki8,700+3.6%
36Starogardzki8,700+8.8%
38Kielecki8,600+3.6%
39Szczeciński8,500+6.3%
40Ostrołęcki8,400+7.7%
41Słupski8,300+7.8%
41Świecki8,300+9.2%
43Ciechanowski8,200+5.1%
43Koniński8,200+3.8%
43Oświęcimski8,200+5.1%
43Pilski8,200+5.1%
47Gdański8,000+8.1%
47Skierniewicki8,000+3.9%
47Tarnobrzeski8,000+3.9%
47Wałbrzyski8,000+8.1%
51Bytomski7,900+3.9%
52Krakowski7,800+6.8%
52Radomski7,800+6.8%
54Sieradzki7,600+5.6%
55Łomżyński7,500+5.6%
56Elbląski7,400+7.2%
56Włocławski7,4000%
58Grudziądzki7,300+4.3%
58Inowrocławski7,300+4.3%
60Suwalski7,200+4.3%
60Tarnowski7,200+4.3%
62Chojnicki7,100+9.2%
62Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski7,100+7.6%
64Nowosądecki6,900+9.5%
65Nyski6,800+4.6%
65Puławski6,800+3%
67Bialski6,700+3.1%
67Szczecinecko-pyrzycki6,700+6.3%
69Krośnieński6,600+4.8%
70Ełcki6,500+4.8%
71Nowotarski6,300+6.8%
72Chełmsko-zamojski6,000+3.4%
73Przemyski5,800+5.5%

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP at current market prices divided by population, EUR per inhabitant.

In euros, for Spain and the EU. For the United States, its states and counties, and for other countries and the World, in US dollars use gdp_per_capita_usd.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita (euros) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita (euros)?

Miasto Warszawa, with €30,600 in 2014, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita (euros)?

Przemyski, with €5,800 in 2014.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP at current market prices by NUTS 3 region, EUR per inhabitant (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.

GDP per capita: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings