NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100), 2018
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 73 areas in 2018, at 207%. Przemyski had the lowest, at 38%. The median was 56% and the figure for Poland was 72%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest207Miasto Warszawa

Lowest38Przemyski

Median5673 areas

Poland72History

Top 40 areas, 2018

CSV Chart (SVG)

%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2018 (%)	Change on 2017
1	Miasto Warszawa	207	+8 pts
2	Miasto Poznań	137	+1 pts
3	Miasto Wrocław	121	+5 pts
4	Miasto Kraków	120	+5 pts
5	Płocki	106	+2 pts
6	Trójmiejski	105	+6 pts
7	Warszawski zachodni	101	+4 pts
8	Katowicki	95	+5 pts
9	Miasto Łódź	90	+5 pts
10	Legnicko-głogowski	89	-5 pts
11	Tyski	87	-2 pts
12	Poznański	86	0 pts
13	Miasto Szczecin	85	+4 pts
14	Gliwicki	84	+1 pts
15	Bielski	74	+1 pts
16	Wrocławski	73	+1 pts
17	Bydgosko-toruński	72	+2 pts
18	Opolski	68	+2 pts
18	Sosnowiecki	68	+3 pts
20	Piotrkowski	67	+1 pts
21	Lubelski	65	+1 pts
22	Kaliski	64	+1 pts
22	Leszczyński	64	+1 pts
22	Rybnicki	64	+2 pts
22	Żyrardowski	64	0 pts
26	Rzeszowski	63	+2 pts
27	Częstochowski	62	0 pts
28	Świecki	61	+7 pts
29	Łódzki	60	+1 pts
29	Warszawski wschodni	60	+1 pts
29	Zielonogórski	60	+1 pts
32	Białostocki	59	+1 pts
32	Koszaliński	59	+1 pts
34	Gorzowski	58	+1 pts
35	Kielecki	57	+2 pts
36	Jeleniogórski	56	+1 pts
36	Koniński	56	+1 pts
36	Ostrołęcki	56	+1 pts
36	Szczeciński	56	+1 pts
40	Ciechanowski	55	+1 pts
40	Krakowski	55	+1 pts
40	Olsztyński	55	0 pts
40	Pilski	55	+2 pts
40	Siedlecki	55	0 pts
45	Słupski	54	+1 pts
46	Bytomski	53	+2 pts
46	Gdański	53	+1 pts
46	Oświęcimski	53	-1 pts
46	Starogardzki	53	-1 pts
46	Tarnobrzeski	53	+2 pts
51	Wałbrzyski	52	+1 pts
52	Skierniewicki	51	-1 pts
53	Radomski	50	0 pts
54	Grudziądzki	49	+1 pts
54	Łomżyński	49	0 pts
54	Sieradzki	49	-1 pts
57	Elbląski	48	0 pts
58	Chojnicki	47	+1 pts
58	Inowrocławski	47	0 pts
58	Suwalski	47	+1 pts
58	Tarnowski	47	+1 pts
58	Włocławski	47	0 pts
63	Nowosądecki	46	+2 pts
63	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	46	+2 pts
65	Bialski	44	+1 pts
65	Puławski	44	-1 pts
67	Nowotarski	43	+1 pts
67	Nyski	43	0 pts
67	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	43	0 pts
70	Ełcki	42	0 pts
70	Krośnieński	42	+1 pts
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	38	-1 pts
72	Przemyski	38	+1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 207% in 2018, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Przemyski, with 38% in 2018.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.