NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100), 2017
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 73 areas in 2017, at 199%. Przemyski had the lowest, at 37%. The median was 55% and the figure for Poland was 70%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest199Miasto Warszawa

Lowest37Przemyski

Median5573 areas

Poland70History

Top 40 areas, 2017

CSV Chart (SVG)

%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2017 (%)	Change on 2016
1	Miasto Warszawa	199	+5 pts
2	Miasto Poznań	136	+3 pts
3	Miasto Wrocław	116	+4 pts
4	Miasto Kraków	115	+3 pts
5	Płocki	104	-5 pts
6	Trójmiejski	99	+1 pts
7	Warszawski zachodni	97	-2 pts
8	Legnicko-głogowski	94	0 pts
9	Katowicki	90	+2 pts
10	Tyski	89	+2 pts
11	Poznański	86	0 pts
12	Miasto Łódź	85	+2 pts
13	Gliwicki	83	-1 pts
14	Miasto Szczecin	81	+1 pts
15	Bielski	73	0 pts
16	Wrocławski	72	0 pts
17	Bydgosko-toruński	70	-1 pts
18	Opolski	66	0 pts
18	Piotrkowski	66	-1 pts
20	Sosnowiecki	65	-1 pts
21	Lubelski	64	+1 pts
21	Żyrardowski	64	-1 pts
23	Kaliski	63	0 pts
23	Leszczyński	63	+1 pts
25	Częstochowski	62	+1 pts
25	Rybnicki	62	+3 pts
27	Rzeszowski	61	0 pts
28	Łódzki	59	-1 pts
28	Warszawski wschodni	59	0 pts
28	Zielonogórski	59	0 pts
31	Białostocki	58	+1 pts
31	Koszaliński	58	+1 pts
33	Gorzowski	57	-1 pts
34	Jeleniogórski	55	0 pts
34	Kielecki	55	0 pts
34	Koniński	55	+2 pts
34	Olsztyński	55	-1 pts
34	Ostrołęcki	55	+3 pts
34	Siedlecki	55	+1 pts
34	Szczeciński	55	0 pts
41	Ciechanowski	54	+2 pts
41	Krakowski	54	+1 pts
41	Oświęcimski	54	+1 pts
41	Starogardzki	54	-2 pts
41	Świecki	54	+3 pts
46	Pilski	53	-1 pts
46	Słupski	53	+2 pts
48	Gdański	52	+1 pts
48	Skierniewicki	52	+1 pts
50	Bytomski	51	+1 pts
50	Tarnobrzeski	51	-1 pts
50	Wałbrzyski	51	-1 pts
53	Radomski	50	+1 pts
53	Sieradzki	50	+1 pts
55	Łomżyński	49	+2 pts
56	Elbląski	48	0 pts
56	Grudziądzki	48	+1 pts
58	Inowrocławski	47	+1 pts
58	Włocławski	47	-1 pts
60	Chojnicki	46	0 pts
60	Suwalski	46	+1 pts
60	Tarnowski	46	+1 pts
63	Puławski	45	+1 pts
64	Nowosądecki	44	+1 pts
64	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	44	0 pts
66	Bialski	43	+1 pts
66	Nyski	43	0 pts
66	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	43	0 pts
69	Ełcki	42	0 pts
69	Nowotarski	42	+1 pts
71	Krośnieński	41	0 pts
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	39	+1 pts
73	Przemyski	37	0 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 199% in 2017, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Przemyski, with 37% in 2017.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.