NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100), 2013
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 73 areas in 2013, at 196%. Przemyski had the lowest, at 36%. The median was 54% and the figure for Poland was 67%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest196Miasto Warszawa

Lowest36Przemyski

Median5473 areas

Poland67History

Top 40 areas, 2013

CSV Chart (SVG)

%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2013 (%)	Change on 2012
1	Miasto Warszawa	196	+2 pts
2	Miasto Poznań	132	+3 pts
3	Miasto Wrocław	107	+3 pts
4	Miasto Kraków	106	+3 pts
5	Legnicko-głogowski	103	-13 pts
6	Trójmiejski	95	-4 pts
7	Warszawski zachodni	93	-2 pts
8	Płocki	92	-11 pts
9	Katowicki	91	+1 pts
10	Tyski	89	-7 pts
11	Miasto Łódź	81	0 pts
12	Poznański	80	+1 pts
13	Gliwicki	79	-1 pts
14	Miasto Szczecin	78	-1 pts
15	Bydgosko-toruński	69	-1 pts
16	Bielski	66	-1 pts
16	Wrocławski	66	0 pts
18	Piotrkowski	65	-2 pts
19	Opolski	64	0 pts
19	Żyrardowski	64	+1 pts
21	Lubelski	63	+1 pts
22	Rybnicki	61	-3 pts
22	Sosnowiecki	61	-2 pts
24	Leszczyński	60	+1 pts
25	Rzeszowski	59	0 pts
26	Białostocki	57	0 pts
26	Częstochowski	57	0 pts
26	Kaliski	57	0 pts
26	Warszawski wschodni	57	0 pts
26	Zielonogórski	57	+1 pts
31	Gorzowski	56	-1 pts
31	Jeleniogórski	56	-1 pts
31	Koszaliński	56	0 pts
31	Łódzki	56	-1 pts
35	Olsztyński	55	+1 pts
35	Siedlecki	55	+1 pts
37	Kielecki	54	-1 pts
38	Starogardzki	53	0 pts
39	Koniński	52	0 pts
39	Szczeciński	52	-2 pts
41	Ciechanowski	51	+1 pts
41	Ostrołęcki	51	+2 pts
41	Oświęcimski	51	-1 pts
41	Pilski	51	0 pts
45	Bytomski	50	0 pts
45	Skierniewicki	50	0 pts
45	Słupski	50	-1 pts
45	Świecki	50	+3 pts
45	Tarnobrzeski	50	+1 pts
50	Gdański	49	+1 pts
51	Krakowski	48	0 pts
51	Wałbrzyski	48	-1 pts
51	Włocławski	48	+2 pts
54	Łomżyński	47	+2 pts
54	Radomski	47	-1 pts
54	Sieradzki	47	0 pts
57	Grudziądzki	46	+2 pts
57	Inowrocławski	46	0 pts
59	Elbląski	45	-1 pts
59	Suwalski	45	+1 pts
59	Tarnowski	45	-3 pts
62	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	44	-1 pts
63	Chojnicki	43	-1 pts
63	Puławski	43	-1 pts
65	Bialski	42	0 pts
65	Nyski	42	-1 pts
67	Krośnieński	41	0 pts
67	Nowosądecki	41	-1 pts
67	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	41	0 pts
70	Ełcki	40	-1 pts
71	Nowotarski	39	0 pts
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	38	-1 pts
73	Przemyski	36	0 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 196% in 2013, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Przemyski, with 36% in 2013.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.