NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100), 2016
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 73 areas in 2016, at 194%. Przemyski had the lowest, at 37%. The median was 55% and the figure for Poland was 69%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest194Miasto Warszawa

Lowest37Przemyski

Median5573 areas

Poland69History

Top 40 areas, 2016

CSV Chart (SVG)

%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2016 (%)	Change on 2015
1	Miasto Warszawa	194	-3 pts
2	Miasto Poznań	133	-1 pts
3	Miasto Kraków	112	+1 pts
3	Miasto Wrocław	112	-1 pts
5	Płocki	109	+5 pts
6	Warszawski zachodni	99	-1 pts
7	Trójmiejski	98	+1 pts
8	Legnicko-głogowski	94	-6 pts
9	Katowicki	88	-4 pts
10	Tyski	87	-1 pts
11	Poznański	86	+1 pts
12	Gliwicki	84	+1 pts
13	Miasto Łódź	83	-2 pts
14	Miasto Szczecin	80	-3 pts
15	Bielski	73	0 pts
16	Wrocławski	72	+1 pts
17	Bydgosko-toruński	71	-1 pts
18	Piotrkowski	67	0 pts
19	Opolski	66	-2 pts
19	Sosnowiecki	66	+1 pts
21	Żyrardowski	65	-1 pts
22	Kaliski	63	-1 pts
22	Lubelski	63	0 pts
24	Leszczyński	62	-1 pts
25	Częstochowski	61	+1 pts
25	Rzeszowski	61	-1 pts
27	Łódzki	60	-1 pts
28	Rybnicki	59	-2 pts
28	Warszawski wschodni	59	-2 pts
28	Zielonogórski	59	0 pts
31	Gorzowski	58	0 pts
32	Białostocki	57	-1 pts
32	Koszaliński	57	-2 pts
34	Olsztyński	56	0 pts
34	Starogardzki	56	0 pts
36	Jeleniogórski	55	-2 pts
36	Kielecki	55	-1 pts
36	Szczeciński	55	-1 pts
39	Pilski	54	-1 pts
39	Siedlecki	54	-1 pts
41	Koniński	53	0 pts
41	Krakowski	53	+1 pts
41	Oświęcimski	53	-1 pts
44	Ciechanowski	52	0 pts
44	Ostrołęcki	52	-2 pts
44	Tarnobrzeski	52	0 pts
44	Wałbrzyski	52	0 pts
48	Gdański	51	-1 pts
48	Skierniewicki	51	+1 pts
48	Słupski	51	-2 pts
48	Świecki	51	-1 pts
52	Bytomski	50	-2 pts
53	Radomski	49	-1 pts
53	Sieradzki	49	0 pts
55	Elbląski	48	0 pts
55	Włocławski	48	-2 pts
57	Grudziądzki	47	0 pts
57	Łomżyński	47	0 pts
59	Chojnicki	46	+1 pts
59	Inowrocławski	46	0 pts
61	Suwalski	45	0 pts
61	Tarnowski	45	-2 pts
63	Puławski	44	-1 pts
63	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	44	-1 pts
65	Nowosądecki	43	-2 pts
65	Nyski	43	0 pts
65	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	43	0 pts
68	Bialski	42	0 pts
68	Ełcki	42	+1 pts
70	Krośnieński	41	-1 pts
70	Nowotarski	41	0 pts
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	38	0 pts
73	Przemyski	37	0 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 194% in 2016, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Przemyski, with 37% in 2016.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.