NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)

Name: NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100), 2015
Creator: Eurostat, European Commission
License: Eurostat reuse policy (commercial and non-commercial reuse, attribution required)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 73 areas in 2015, at 197%. Przemyski had the lowest, at 37%. The median was 56% and the figure for Poland was 70%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest197Miasto Warszawa

Lowest37Przemyski

Median5673 areas

Poland70History

Top 40 areas, 2015

CSV Chart (SVG)

%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2015 (%)	Change on 2014
1	Miasto Warszawa	197	+3 pts
2	Miasto Poznań	134	+3 pts
3	Miasto Wrocław	113	+4 pts
4	Miasto Kraków	111	+4 pts
5	Płocki	104	+10 pts
6	Legnicko-głogowski	100	-1 pts
6	Warszawski zachodni	100	+4 pts
8	Trójmiejski	97	+5 pts
9	Katowicki	92	+2 pts
10	Tyski	88	+1 pts
11	Miasto Łódź	85	+2 pts
11	Poznański	85	+3 pts
13	Gliwicki	83	+2 pts
13	Miasto Szczecin	83	+4 pts
15	Bielski	73	+4 pts
16	Bydgosko-toruński	72	+3 pts
17	Wrocławski	71	+4 pts
18	Opolski	68	+2 pts
19	Piotrkowski	67	+1 pts
20	Żyrardowski	66	+3 pts
21	Sosnowiecki	65	+2 pts
22	Kaliski	64	+4 pts
23	Leszczyński	63	+2 pts
23	Lubelski	63	-1 pts
25	Rzeszowski	62	+3 pts
26	Łódzki	61	+3 pts
26	Rybnicki	61	+1 pts
26	Warszawski wschodni	61	+2 pts
29	Częstochowski	60	+2 pts
30	Koszaliński	59	+2 pts
30	Zielonogórski	59	+1 pts
32	Białostocki	58	+1 pts
32	Gorzowski	58	+1 pts
34	Jeleniogórski	57	-1 pts
35	Kielecki	56	+1 pts
35	Olsztyński	56	0 pts
35	Starogardzki	56	+1 pts
35	Szczeciński	56	+2 pts
39	Pilski	55	+3 pts
39	Siedlecki	55	0 pts
41	Ostrołęcki	54	+1 pts
41	Oświęcimski	54	+2 pts
43	Koniński	53	+1 pts
43	Słupski	53	+1 pts
45	Bytomski	52	+2 pts
45	Ciechanowski	52	0 pts
45	Gdański	52	+1 pts
45	Krakowski	52	+2 pts
45	Świecki	52	0 pts
45	Tarnobrzeski	52	+1 pts
45	Wałbrzyski	52	+1 pts
52	Radomski	50	+1 pts
52	Skierniewicki	50	-1 pts
52	Włocławski	50	+3 pts
55	Sieradzki	49	+1 pts
56	Elbląski	48	+1 pts
57	Grudziądzki	47	+1 pts
57	Łomżyński	47	0 pts
57	Tarnowski	47	+2 pts
60	Inowrocławski	46	0 pts
61	Chojnicki	45	0 pts
61	Nowosądecki	45	+1 pts
61	Puławski	45	+2 pts
61	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	45	0 pts
61	Suwalski	45	-1 pts
66	Nyski	43	0 pts
66	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	43	0 pts
68	Bialski	42	0 pts
68	Krośnieński	42	0 pts
70	Ełcki	41	0 pts
70	Nowotarski	41	+1 pts
72	Chełmsko-zamojski	38	0 pts
73	Przemyski	37	0 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 197% in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?

Przemyski, with 37% in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.