Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Los Angeles, CA had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 368 cities in 2022, at 3,182. Ukiah, CA had the lowest, at 0. The median was 51. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2022 | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 3,182 | +28.6% |
| 2 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 1,957 | +2.4% |
| 3 | Santa Clara, CA Estimated | 1,926 | +435% |
| 4 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,705 | +52.1% |
| 5 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 1,578 | -16.2% |
| 6 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 924 | +8.8% |
| 7 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 905 | -9.9% |
| 8 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 904 | -28.5% |
| 9 | Lincoln, CA Estimated | 826 | -18.7% |
| 10 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 818 | +16.7% |
| 11 | Folsom, CA Estimated | 803 | -15.4% |
| 12 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 790 | +78.7% |
| 13 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 746 | +1.1% |
| 14 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 618 | +12% |
| 15 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 598 | -20.1% |
| 16 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 594 | -47.4% |
| 17 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 581 | +3.2% |
| 18 | Victorville, CA Estimated | 578 | -10% |
| 19 | San Jose, CA Estimated | 553 | +84.9% |
| 20 | Chino, CA Estimated | 538 | +34.8% |
| 20 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 538 | -17.5% |
| 22 | Indio, CA Estimated | 531 | +1.7% |
| 23 | Tracy, CA Estimated | 509 | -26.4% |
| 24 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 506 | -6.1% |
| 25 | La Quinta, CA Estimated | 501 | +95.7% |
| 26 | Stockton, CA Estimated | 493 | -10% |
| 27 | San Marcos, CA Estimated | 491 | +241% |
| 28 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 476 | -42.2% |
| 29 | Paradise, CA Estimated | 471 | -29.9% |
| 30 | Palm Desert, CA Estimated | 403 | +183.8% |
| 31 | Temecula, CA Estimated | 394 | -9.8% |
| 32 | Chula Vista, CA Estimated | 331 | +13.7% |
| 33 | Tulare, CA Estimated | 317 | +151.6% |
| 34 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 311 | +40.7% |
| 35 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 310 | -24.2% |
| 36 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 304 | -3.5% |
| 37 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 298 | -18.4% |
| 38 | Antioch, CA Estimated | 296 | -48.8% |
| 39 | Woodland, CA Estimated | 288 | +85.8% |
| 40 | Santa Rosa, CA Estimated | 286 | -31.9% |
| 41 | Garden Grove, CA Estimated | 283 | +3.3% |
| 42 | Hesperia, CA Estimated | 276 | +12.7% |
| 43 | Hanford, CA Estimated | 271 | +1.9% |
| 43 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 271 | -41.5% |
| 45 | Palmdale, CA Estimated | 261 | +39.6% |
| 46 | Chico, CA Estimated | 249 | +3.8% |
| 47 | Oakley, CA Estimated | 239 | -51% |
| 48 | San Luis Obispo, CA Estimated | 238 | -17.1% |
| 49 | Redding, CA Estimated | 237 | +54.9% |
| 50 | Modesto, CA Estimated | 236 | +23.6% |
| 51 | Newark, CA Estimated | 230 | -13.5% |
| 51 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 230 | -38.5% |
| 53 | Hollister, CA Estimated | 229 | -42.2% |
| 54 | Dixon, CA Estimated | 222 | +76.2% |
| 55 | Merced, CA Estimated | 214 | -70.4% |
| 55 | San Jacinto, CA Estimated | 214 | +74% |
| 55 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 214 | -41.2% |
| 58 | Shafter, CA Estimated | 211 | -41.9% |
| 59 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 208 | -27.8% |
| 60 | Madera, CA Estimated | 203 | -19.1% |
| 61 | Marina, CA Estimated | 202 | -3.8% |
| 62 | Riverside, CA Estimated | 199 | -32.1% |
| 63 | Moreno Valley, CA Estimated | 198 | -47.5% |
| 64 | Alameda, CA Estimated | 197 | -0.5% |
| 65 | Long Beach, CA Estimated | 192 | -36.8% |
| 66 | Palm Springs, CA Estimated | 187 | -35.1% |
| 67 | Rohnert Park, CA Estimated | 184 | -18.6% |
| 68 | Rancho Mirage, CA Estimated | 183 | -43.3% |
| 69 | Santa Ana, CA Estimated | 180 | -22.1% |
| 70 | Westminster, CA Estimated | 177 | +48.7% |
| 71 | San Juan Capistrano, CA Estimated | 173 | +981.3% |
| 72 | Torrance, CA Estimated | 170 | +325% |
| 73 | Lodi, CA Estimated | 169 | -52.7% |
| 73 | South Gate, CA Estimated | 169 | +22.5% |
| 75 | Escondido, CA Estimated | 165 | -51.2% |
| 76 | Brawley, CA Estimated | 162 | +2.5% |
| 77 | Encinitas, CA Estimated | 159 | +20.5% |
| 77 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 159 | +12.8% |
| 79 | Hemet, CA Estimated | 155 | -29.2% |
| 80 | Yucaipa, CA Estimated | 154 | +156.7% |
| 81 | Banning, CA Estimated | 153 | -27.8% |
| 81 | Downey, CA Estimated | 153 | +26.4% |
| 81 | Rosemead, CA Estimated | 153 | +35.4% |
| 84 | Sunnyvale, CA Estimated | 149 | -22% |
| 85 | Desert Hot Springs, CA Estimated | 143 | -20.6% |
| 85 | Poway, CA Estimated | 143 | +333.3% |
| 87 | Imperial, CA Estimated | 139 | -9.7% |
| 88 | Pomona, CA Estimated | 138 | +16.9% |
| 89 | Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 137 | +7.9% |
| 90 | Gardena, CA Estimated | 136 | +112.5% |
| 90 | Inglewood, CA Estimated | 136 | -11.1% |
| 90 | San Bernardino, CA Estimated | 136 | -4.9% |
| 93 | Burbank, CA Estimated | 135 | -21.5% |
| 94 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 133 | +31.7% |
| 95 | Morgan Hill, CA Estimated | 132 | +53.5% |
| 95 | Saratoga, CA Estimated | 132 | +46.7% |
| 97 | Truckee, CA Estimated | 131 | +12.9% |
| 98 | Lynwood, CA Estimated | 130 | +44.4% |
| 98 | Redlands, CA Estimated | 130 | +103.1% |
| 100 | Santa Maria, CA Estimated | 129 | -2.3% |
| 101 | Perris, CA Estimated | 127 | -18.6% |
| 102 | Huntington Beach, CA Estimated | 126 | +26% |
| 102 | Oakland, CA Estimated | 126 | +10.5% |
| 104 | Newport Beach, CA Estimated | 121 | -17.7% |
| 104 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 121 | +13.1% |
| 106 | Redondo Beach, CA Estimated | 120 | +57.9% |
| 106 | West Sacramento, CA Estimated | 120 | -36.8% |
| 108 | Mountain View, CA Estimated | 119 | -30.8% |
| 109 | Citrus Heights, CA Estimated | 118 | -45.1% |
| 110 | West Covina, CA Estimated | 116 | +427.3% |
| 111 | Lancaster, CA Estimated | 112 | -57.4% |
| 112 | Alhambra, CA Estimated | 111 | +38.8% |
| 112 | Compton, CA Estimated | 111 | +117.6% |
| 114 | Coachella, CA Estimated | 105 | -11.8% |
| 115 | Rio Vista, CA Estimated | 103 | -24.8% |
| 116 | Highland, CA Estimated | 100 | +222.6% |
| 117 | Riverbank, CA Estimated | 99 | +102% |
| 118 | Santa Paula, CA Estimated | 98 | -53.3% |
| 119 | Napa, CA Estimated | 97 | -19.2% |
| 119 | Simi Valley, CA Estimated | 97 | +115.6% |
| 119 | Wildomar, CA Estimated | 97 | +86.5% |
| 122 | Manhattan Beach, CA Estimated | 95 | +41.8% |
| 123 | American Canyon, CA Estimated | 94 | +2,250% |
| 123 | Galt, CA Estimated | 94 | -21% |
| 123 | Los Banos, CA Estimated | 94 | -17.5% |
| 123 | Walnut, CA Estimated | 94 | +248.1% |
| 127 | Vista, CA Estimated | 91 | -4.2% |
| 128 | Cupertino, CA Estimated | 90 | +100% |
| 129 | Tustin, CA Estimated | 89 | +2,866.7% |
| 130 | Wasco, CA Estimated | 88 | +33.3% |
| 131 | Glendale, CA Estimated | 87 | -35.1% |
| 131 | Reedley, CA Estimated | 87 | -40.4% |
| 133 | Culver City, CA Estimated | 86 | -18.9% |
| 133 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 86 | -58.9% |
| 135 | Carlsbad, CA Estimated | 83 | -22.4% |
| 135 | Soledad, CA Estimated | 83 | +93% |
| 137 | Apple Valley, CA Estimated | 82 | -37.4% |
| 137 | Oceanside, CA Estimated | 82 | +13.9% |
| 137 | Temple City, CA Estimated | 82 | +24.2% |
| 140 | Chowchilla, CA Estimated | 81 | +14.1% |
| 140 | Kerman, CA Estimated | 81 | +113.2% |
| 142 | Arcadia, CA Estimated | 80 | -20% |
| 143 | Berkeley, CA Estimated | 79 | -10.2% |
| 143 | San Gabriel, CA Estimated | 79 | +43.6% |
| 145 | Glendora, CA Estimated | 78 | +47.2% |
| 145 | Laguna Beach, CA Estimated | 78 | +30% |
| 147 | Concord, CA Estimated | 77 | +28.3% |
| 148 | Novato, CA Estimated | 76 | +61.7% |
| 148 | Orange, CA Estimated | 76 | -3.8% |
| 148 | San Fernando, CA Estimated | 76 | -17.4% |
| 151 | King City, CA Estimated | 73 | +265% |
| 151 | Kingsburg, CA Estimated | 73 | +170.4% |
| 151 | Turlock, CA Estimated | 73 | -34.2% |
| 154 | Pittsburg, CA Estimated | 71 | -66% |
| 155 | Santa Cruz, CA Estimated | 70 | +32.1% |
| 155 | Santee, CA Estimated | 70 | +1.4% |
| 157 | Porterville, CA Estimated | 69 | -53.1% |
| 158 | Greenfield, CA Estimated | 68 | +23.6% |
| 159 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA Estimated | 67 | +71.8% |
| 159 | Santa Barbara, CA Estimated | 67 | -57.1% |
| 161 | Milpitas, CA Estimated | 65 | -11% |
| 162 | Lemon Grove, CA Estimated | 64 | +68.4% |
| 162 | Richmond, CA Estimated | 64 | -16.9% |
| 162 | Santa Monica, CA Estimated | 64 | -16.9% |
| 165 | El Cajon, CA Estimated | 63 | +70.3% |
| 165 | Fountain Valley, CA Estimated | 63 | +110% |
| 165 | Pleasanton, CA Estimated | 63 | -18.2% |
| 168 | Colton, CA Estimated | 62 | +40.9% |
| 168 | San Rafael, CA Estimated | 62 | +148% |
| 170 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA Estimated | 60 | +300% |
| 170 | Whittier, CA Estimated | 60 | -68.3% |
| 172 | Salinas, CA Estimated | 59 | -7.8% |
| 173 | Oxnard, CA Estimated | 58 | +11.5% |
| 174 | Atascadero, CA Estimated | 57 | -14.9% |
| 175 | Upland, CA Estimated | 56 | +12% |
| 176 | Cathedral City, CA Estimated | 55 | -63.3% |
| 176 | Hillsborough, CA Estimated | 55 | +1.9% |
| 176 | Monrovia, CA Estimated | 55 | +48.6% |
| 179 | Yucca Valley, CA Estimated | 54 | +184.2% |
| 180 | Pico Rivera, CA Estimated | 53 | +10.4% |
| 180 | Watsonville, CA Estimated | 53 | -19.7% |
| 182 | Baldwin Park, CA Estimated | 51 | +112.5% |
| 182 | La Mesa, CA Estimated | 51 | -25% |
| 182 | Norwalk, CA Estimated | 51 | +1,600% |
| 182 | Pasadena, CA Estimated | 51 | +10.9% |
| 182 | South San Francisco, CA Estimated | 51 | +96.2% |
| 187 | Danville, CA Estimated | 49 | +28.9% |
| 187 | Placentia, CA Estimated | 49 | -21% |
| 189 | Anaheim, CA Estimated | 48 | -43.5% |
| 189 | San Leandro, CA Estimated | 48 | 0% |
| 189 | Yuba City, CA Estimated | 48 | -7.7% |
| 192 | Patterson, CA Estimated | 47 | -20.3% |
| 193 | Campbell, CA Estimated | 46 | -43.9% |
| 193 | Corona, CA Estimated | 46 | -74% |
| 193 | Petaluma, CA Estimated | 46 | -58.6% |
| 193 | Stanton, CA Estimated | 46 | -66.4% |
| 197 | Los Altos, CA Estimated | 45 | -41.6% |
| 197 | Menlo Park, CA Estimated | 45 | +36.4% |
| 199 | Bellflower, CA Estimated | 44 | +51.7% |
| 199 | Redwood City, CA Estimated | 44 | -21.4% |
| 199 | Scotts Valley, CA Estimated | 44 | +29.4% |
| 202 | Martinez, CA Estimated | 42 | -33.3% |
| 203 | Diamond Bar, CA Estimated | 41 | +105% |
| 203 | Dinuba, CA Estimated | 41 | -57.3% |
| 205 | San Ramon, CA Estimated | 40 | +81.8% |
| 206 | Yorba Linda, CA Estimated | 39 | +178.6% |
| 207 | San Francisco, CA Estimated | 38 | +15.2% |
| 207 | Twentynine Palms, CA Estimated | 38 | +850% |
| 209 | El Cerrito, CA Estimated | 37 | +48% |
| 209 | Mill Valley, CA Estimated | 37 | +37% |
| 209 | Sanger, CA Estimated | 37 | +428.6% |
| 212 | El Segundo, CA Estimated | 36 | +71.4% |
| 212 | Fortuna, CA Estimated | 36 | +2.9% |
| 212 | Rialto, CA Estimated | 36 | -23.4% |
| 212 | Ridgecrest, CA Estimated | 36 | -55% |
| 216 | San Clemente, CA Estimated | 35 | 0% |
| 216 | San Dimas, CA Estimated | 35 | +94.4% |
| 218 | Calexico, CA Estimated | 34 | -43.3% |
| 218 | Camarillo, CA Estimated | 34 | -74.2% |
| 218 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 34 | -65.7% |
| 218 | Mission Viejo, CA Estimated | 34 | +6.3% |
| 218 | South Lake Tahoe, CA Estimated | 34 | +88.9% |
| 218 | South Pasadena, CA Estimated | 34 | +100% |
| 224 | San Carlos, CA Estimated | 32 | -15.8% |
| 225 | Union City, CA Estimated | 31 | +34.8% |
| 226 | Burlingame, CA Estimated | 30 | +11.1% |
| 226 | Los Gatos, CA Estimated | 30 | -74.8% |
| 228 | El Monte, CA Estimated | 29 | -19.4% |
| 228 | Eureka, CA Estimated | 29 | +31.8% |
| 228 | Pacific Grove, CA Estimated | 29 | +93.3% |
| 231 | California City, CA Estimated | 28 | -20% |
| 231 | Hermosa Beach, CA Estimated | 28 | 0% |
| 231 | Loma Linda, CA Estimated | 28 | +12% |
| 234 | Buena Park, CA Estimated | 27 | -85.2% |
| 234 | Dana Point, CA Estimated | 27 | -44.9% |
| 234 | Montebello, CA Estimated | 27 | -15.6% |
| 237 | Paramount, CA Estimated | 26 | +18.2% |
| 238 | La Puente, CA Estimated | 25 | +19% |
| 238 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 25 | -30.6% |
| 240 | San Bruno, CA Estimated | 24 | +118.2% |
| 241 | Davis, CA Estimated | 23 | -14.8% |
| 241 | National City, CA Estimated | 23 | +76.9% |
| 243 | Beverly Hills, CA Estimated | 22 | -12% |
| 243 | Foster City, CA Estimated | 22 | -21.4% |
| 243 | Lemoore, CA Estimated | 22 | -77.8% |
| 243 | Oakdale, CA Estimated | 22 | -45% |
| 247 | Adelanto, CA Estimated | 21 | -89.9% |
| 247 | Delano, CA Estimated | 21 | -25% |
| 247 | McFarland, CA Estimated | 21 | +950% |
| 247 | San Anselmo, CA Estimated | 21 | +40% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 4 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2022 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 2 Apr. 2024, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2024. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2024) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_cities_in_california_by_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022}},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West\%20Region/we2022a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2022
PY - 2024
DA - 2024/04/02
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2022a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Los Angeles, CA, with 3,182 in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Ukiah, CA, with 0 in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 4 cities have no value for 2022 and are not ranked.