Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Los Angeles, CA had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 369 cities in 2018, at 2,636. Seaside, CA had the lowest, at 0. The median was 39. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2018
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2018 | Change on 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 2,636 | +11.7% |
| 2 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 1,865 | +8.7% |
| 3 | Santa Rosa, CA Estimated | 1,632 | +603.4% |
| 4 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 1,610 | -6.8% |
| 5 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,061 | -31.2% |
| 6 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 1,056 | +62.7% |
| 7 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 976 | +36.1% |
| 8 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 892 | +16.4% |
| 9 | Moreno Valley, CA Estimated | 854 | +89.4% |
| 10 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 821 | +20.7% |
| 11 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 808 | -32.2% |
| 12 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 774 | -32% |
| 13 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 693 | +72.4% |
| 14 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 684 | -7.7% |
| 15 | Tracy, CA Estimated | 644 | +152.5% |
| 16 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 615 | -36.3% |
| 17 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 585 | -19% |
| 18 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 521 | +0.8% |
| 19 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 516 | -21.8% |
| 20 | Chula Vista, CA Estimated | 515 | -3.4% |
| 21 | Chino, CA Estimated | 437 | -25.9% |
| 22 | Folsom, CA Estimated | 424 | +205% |
| 23 | Milpitas, CA Estimated | 415 | +8.4% |
| 24 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 413 | -26.5% |
| 25 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 408 | -27.7% |
| 26 | Murrieta, CA Estimated | 397 | +98.5% |
| 27 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 372 | -15.5% |
| 28 | Hollister, CA Estimated | 371 | -28.5% |
| 29 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 367 | +33% |
| 30 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 353 | -42.5% |
| 31 | Tulare, CA Estimated | 350 | +12.9% |
| 32 | Chico, CA Estimated | 341 | +24.9% |
| 33 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 324 | -36% |
| 33 | Stockton, CA Estimated | 324 | +24.1% |
| 35 | Indio, CA Estimated | 322 | -8% |
| 36 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 314 | +17.2% |
| 37 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 284 | -31.4% |
| 37 | Los Banos, CA Estimated | 284 | +5.2% |
| 39 | Newark, CA Estimated | 281 | +15.2% |
| 40 | Rio Vista, CA Estimated | 274 | +110.8% |
| 40 | Sunnyvale, CA Estimated | 274 | -34.1% |
| 42 | Victorville, CA Estimated | 267 | +73.4% |
| 43 | Rohnert Park, CA Estimated | 264 | +39.7% |
| 44 | Camarillo, CA Estimated | 259 | -25.1% |
| 45 | Carlsbad, CA Estimated | 258 | -24.8% |
| 46 | Hesperia, CA Estimated | 249 | +7.3% |
| 47 | Lodi, CA Estimated | 247 | +57.3% |
| 48 | San Jose, CA Estimated | 238 | +34.5% |
| 49 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 237 | -68.9% |
| 50 | Chino Hills, CA Estimated | 231 | -38.7% |
| 51 | Oakland, CA Estimated | 230 | +74.2% |
| 52 | Modesto, CA Estimated | 223 | +4.7% |
| 53 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 217 | 0% |
| 54 | Morgan Hill, CA Estimated | 216 | +21.3% |
| 55 | Woodland, CA Estimated | 210 | +70.7% |
| 56 | Marina, CA Estimated | 205 | +26.5% |
| 57 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 196 | -29% |
| 58 | Rancho Mirage, CA Estimated | 195 | +712.5% |
| 59 | Pomona, CA Estimated | 189 | +4.4% |
| 60 | Imperial, CA Estimated | 186 | +59% |
| 61 | Oakley, CA Estimated | 184 | +13.6% |
| 62 | Hanford, CA Estimated | 182 | -0.5% |
| 63 | Corona, CA Estimated | 180 | +59.3% |
| 63 | Vista, CA Estimated | 180 | +373.7% |
| 65 | Madera, CA Estimated | 178 | +53.4% |
| 66 | Cypress, CA Estimated | 173 | +35.2% |
| 67 | Riverside, CA Estimated | 171 | -17.8% |
| 68 | Santa Clara, CA Estimated | 164 | +97.6% |
| 69 | Costa Mesa, CA Estimated | 163 | -16.8% |
| 70 | San Ramon, CA Estimated | 160 | +7,900% |
| 70 | Upland, CA Estimated | 160 | +107.8% |
| 72 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 159 | -51.2% |
| 73 | San Jacinto, CA Estimated | 158 | 0% |
| 73 | Santa Maria, CA Estimated | 158 | -50.6% |
| 75 | Encinitas, CA Estimated | 157 | +36.5% |
| 76 | Yorba Linda, CA Estimated | 142 | +79.7% |
| 77 | Shafter, CA Estimated | 137 | -4.2% |
| 78 | San Marcos, CA Estimated | 134 | -66.1% |
| 79 | Newport Beach, CA Estimated | 130 | +9.2% |
| 80 | Long Beach, CA Estimated | 128 | +23.1% |
| 80 | McFarland, CA Estimated | 128 | +456.5% |
| 82 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 127 | -48% |
| 82 | La Quinta, CA Estimated | 127 | +12.4% |
| 82 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 127 | -7.3% |
| 85 | Palm Springs, CA Estimated | 125 | -5.3% |
| 85 | Wasco, CA Estimated | 125 | +5% |
| 87 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 124 | -59.7% |
| 88 | Oceanside, CA Estimated | 122 | +16.2% |
| 88 | San Luis Obispo, CA Estimated | 122 | +13% |
| 88 | Santa Ana, CA Estimated | 122 | -38.1% |
| 91 | Anaheim, CA Estimated | 121 | +68.1% |
| 91 | Manhattan Beach, CA Estimated | 121 | +14.2% |
| 91 | Santa Barbara, CA Estimated | 121 | -17.1% |
| 94 | Perris, CA Estimated | 115 | -34.7% |
| 95 | Delano, CA Estimated | 111 | +65.7% |
| 95 | Garden Grove, CA Estimated | 111 | +909.1% |
| 97 | Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 110 | -4.3% |
| 98 | Arvin, CA Estimated | 107 | +24.4% |
| 99 | Redondo Beach, CA Estimated | 105 | -34.4% |
| 100 | Eastvale, CA Estimated | 104 | -70.5% |
| 101 | Livingston, CA Estimated | 103 | +63.5% |
| 101 | Redding, CA Estimated | 103 | -30.9% |
| 103 | Lancaster, CA Estimated | 102 | -15.7% |
| 103 | Truckee, CA Estimated | 102 | -5.6% |
| 105 | El Cajon, CA Estimated | 101 | +102% |
| 106 | Gardena, CA Estimated | 98 | +117.8% |
| 107 | Dinuba, CA Estimated | 97 | +34.7% |
| 107 | San Clemente, CA Estimated | 97 | +18.3% |
| 109 | Richmond, CA Estimated | 96 | +464.7% |
| 110 | Ridgecrest, CA Estimated | 94 | +49.2% |
| 111 | Calimesa, CA Estimated | 93 | +116.3% |
| 112 | Cathedral City, CA Estimated | 92 | +8.2% |
| 112 | Kerman, CA Estimated | 92 | +124.4% |
| 112 | Lincoln, CA Estimated | 92 | -49.2% |
| 112 | Redlands, CA Estimated | 92 | 0% |
| 116 | Glendale, CA Estimated | 90 | +1,025% |
| 116 | Simi Valley, CA Estimated | 90 | -21.1% |
| 116 | Temecula, CA Estimated | 90 | +4.7% |
| 119 | Union City, CA Estimated | 86 | +186.7% |
| 120 | Dana Point, CA Estimated | 85 | +107.3% |
| 120 | Dixon, CA Estimated | 85 | +84.8% |
| 122 | West Sacramento, CA Estimated | 84 | +2.4% |
| 123 | Temple City, CA Estimated | 83 | -9.8% |
| 124 | Colton, CA Estimated | 82 | +331.6% |
| 124 | Lemoore, CA Estimated | 82 | +49.1% |
| 124 | Ripon, CA Estimated | 82 | +182.8% |
| 127 | Apple Valley, CA Estimated | 79 | -66.7% |
| 127 | Arcadia, CA Estimated | 79 | -16.8% |
| 127 | Baldwin Park, CA Estimated | 79 | +38.6% |
| 130 | Merced, CA Estimated | 77 | +4.1% |
| 130 | Westminster, CA Estimated | 77 | +40% |
| 132 | Porterville, CA Estimated | 74 | +57.4% |
| 133 | Mountain View, CA Estimated | 72 | -55.6% |
| 133 | Soledad, CA Estimated | 72 | +4.3% |
| 135 | Pittsburg, CA Estimated | 70 | -54.5% |
| 135 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA Estimated | 70 | -77.3% |
| 137 | Santa Monica, CA Estimated | 69 | +4.5% |
| 138 | Berkeley, CA Estimated | 66 | +83.3% |
| 138 | Oakdale, CA Estimated | 66 | -40.5% |
| 140 | Highland, CA Estimated | 65 | -3% |
| 140 | Palmdale, CA Estimated | 65 | -33% |
| 140 | Rialto, CA Estimated | 65 | +6.6% |
| 140 | Rosemead, CA Estimated | 65 | -7.1% |
| 144 | Antioch, CA Estimated | 63 | +40% |
| 144 | Campbell, CA Estimated | 63 | +37% |
| 144 | Hemet, CA Estimated | 63 | +1,160% |
| 147 | San Bernardino, CA Estimated | 62 | +287.5% |
| 148 | Palm Desert, CA Estimated | 61 | -15.3% |
| 149 | Tustin, CA Estimated | 60 | +252.9% |
| 150 | Sanger, CA Estimated | 58 | +176.2% |
| 151 | Fillmore, CA Estimated | 57 | +5.6% |
| 151 | Salinas, CA Estimated | 57 | +119.2% |
| 153 | Downey, CA Estimated | 56 | -59.4% |
| 153 | Menlo Park, CA Estimated | 56 | -3.4% |
| 153 | Newman, CA Estimated | 56 | -40.4% |
| 156 | Watsonville, CA Estimated | 55 | +5.8% |
| 157 | Huntington Beach, CA Estimated | 53 | 0% |
| 158 | Stanton, CA Estimated | 52 | +271.4% |
| 158 | Yucca Valley, CA Estimated | 52 | +52.9% |
| 160 | Brawley, CA Estimated | 51 | +8.5% |
| 160 | Vallejo, CA Estimated | 51 | +18.6% |
| 162 | Glendora, CA Estimated | 50 | -50.5% |
| 163 | Napa, CA Estimated | 49 | +6.5% |
| 163 | Patterson, CA Estimated | 49 | +4.3% |
| 165 | Yucaipa, CA Estimated | 48 | +20% |
| 166 | Davis, CA Estimated | 47 | -61.8% |
| 166 | Riverbank, CA Estimated | 47 | +261.5% |
| 168 | Turlock, CA Estimated | 45 | +114.3% |
| 169 | Beverly Hills, CA Estimated | 44 | -6.4% |
| 169 | Goleta, CA Estimated | 44 | +4.8% |
| 169 | Hermosa Beach, CA Estimated | 44 | +29.4% |
| 169 | Santa Cruz, CA Estimated | 44 | +12.8% |
| 169 | Torrance, CA Estimated | 44 | +10% |
| 174 | King City, CA Estimated | 43 | +65.4% |
| 174 | San Juan Capistrano, CA Estimated | 43 | -54.3% |
| 176 | Coalinga, CA Estimated | 42 | -8.7% |
| 176 | Pleasanton, CA Estimated | 42 | -12.5% |
| 176 | Wildomar, CA Estimated | 42 | -49.4% |
| 179 | Cupertino, CA Estimated | 41 | -22.6% |
| 179 | El Segundo, CA Estimated | 41 | +64% |
| 179 | La Puente, CA Estimated | 41 | +720% |
| 179 | Los Altos, CA Estimated | 41 | 0% |
| 183 | Redwood City, CA Estimated | 40 | +25% |
| 183 | Saratoga, CA Estimated | 40 | +90.5% |
| 185 | Azusa, CA Estimated | 39 | -48.7% |
| 185 | Desert Hot Springs, CA Estimated | 39 | +11.4% |
| 185 | El Monte, CA Estimated | 39 | +69.6% |
| 185 | Morro Bay, CA Estimated | 39 | +77.3% |
| 185 | Oxnard, CA Estimated | 39 | -63.9% |
| 185 | Petaluma, CA Estimated | 39 | +116.7% |
| 191 | Chowchilla, CA Estimated | 38 | -13.6% |
| 191 | Claremont, CA Estimated | 38 | -2.6% |
| 193 | Ceres, CA Estimated | 37 | +117.6% |
| 193 | Pleasant Hill, CA Estimated | 37 | +1,750% |
| 195 | Hawthorne, CA Estimated | 36 | +200% |
| 195 | Shasta Lake, CA Estimated | 36 | -7.7% |
| 197 | Arroyo Grande, CA Estimated | 35 | -31.4% |
| 197 | Imperial Beach, CA Estimated | 35 | +66.7% |
| 199 | Alhambra, CA Estimated | 34 | -32% |
| 199 | Buena Park, CA Estimated | 34 | -37% |
| 201 | Burlingame, CA Estimated | 33 | +175% |
| 201 | Galt, CA Estimated | 33 | -52.2% |
| 203 | Coronado, CA Estimated | 32 | -3% |
| 204 | Alameda, CA Estimated | 31 | -32.6% |
| 204 | Diamond Bar, CA Estimated | 31 | -59.7% |
| 204 | La Habra, CA Estimated | 31 | -72.1% |
| 204 | La Mesa, CA Estimated | 31 | +675% |
| 204 | Los Gatos, CA Estimated | 31 | +34.8% |
| 204 | Pasadena, CA Estimated | 31 | +3.3% |
| 210 | Anderson, CA Estimated | 29 | -54% |
| 210 | Atascadero, CA Estimated | 29 | -45.3% |
| 210 | Culver City, CA Estimated | 29 | -38.3% |
| 213 | Moorpark, CA Estimated | 28 | -55.6% |
| 213 | Placerville, CA Estimated | 28 | +115.4% |
| 213 | San Francisco, CA Estimated | 28 | -34.9% |
| 213 | South Gate, CA Estimated | 28 | +75% |
| 213 | Twentynine Palms, CA Estimated | 28 | +154.5% |
| 213 | Yuba City, CA Estimated | 28 | -52.5% |
| 219 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA Estimated | 27 | +145.5% |
| 219 | Walnut Creek, CA Estimated | 27 | -27% |
| 221 | Paradise, CA Estimated | 26 | +4% |
| 221 | Santee, CA Estimated | 26 | -83.1% |
| 221 | Selma, CA Estimated | 26 | +8.3% |
| 224 | Auburn, CA Estimated | 25 | -37.5% |
| 224 | Paramount, CA Estimated | 25 | +92.3% |
| 226 | Arcata, CA Estimated | 24 | +33.3% |
| 226 | Danville, CA Estimated | 24 | +50% |
| 226 | Healdsburg, CA Estimated | 24 | +500% |
| 226 | Lindsay, CA Estimated | 24 | +9.1% |
| 226 | Monrovia, CA Estimated | 24 | -7.7% |
| 226 | Orange, CA Estimated | 24 | -40% |
| 226 | San Gabriel, CA Estimated | 24 | -70.7% |
| 233 | Loma Linda, CA Estimated | 22 | +46.7% |
| 233 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA Estimated | 22 | +15.8% |
| 233 | Red Bluff, CA Estimated | 22 | +4.8% |
| 236 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA Estimated | 21 | 0% |
| 237 | Citrus Heights, CA Estimated | 20 | +11.1% |
| 237 | Escondido, CA Estimated | 20 | -91.5% |
| 237 | Fortuna, CA Estimated | 20 | +33.3% |
| 237 | Monterey Park, CA Estimated | 20 | +42.9% |
| 241 | Bellflower, CA Estimated | 19 | -36.7% |
| 241 | Fullerton, CA Estimated | 19 | -9.5% |
| 241 | Grand Terrace, CA Estimated | 19 | +58.3% |
| 241 | Tehachapi, CA Estimated | 19 | -29.6% |
| 245 | Concord, CA Estimated | 18 | -73.9% |
| 245 | Daly City, CA Estimated | 18 | -10% |
| 245 | Kingsburg, CA Estimated | 18 | -21.7% |
| 245 | Parlier, CA Estimated | 18 | 0% |
| 245 | Thousand Oaks, CA Estimated | 18 | +5.9% |
| 245 | West Hollywood, CA Estimated | 18 | +80% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 3 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2018 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018. U.S. Census Bureau, 20 June 2019, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2019) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_cities_in_california_by_2018,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018}},
year = {2019},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West\%20Region/we2018a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2018
PY - 2019
DA - 2019/06/20
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2018.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2018a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Los Angeles, CA, with 2,636 in 2018, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Seaside, CA, with 0 in 2018.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 3 cities have no value for 2018 and are not ranked.