Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Los Angeles, CA had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 369 cities in 2017, at 2,360. Sierra Madre, CA had the lowest, at 0. The median was 40. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2017
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2017 | Change on 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 2,360 | +31.4% |
| 2 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 1,728 | +69.9% |
| 3 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 1,715 | +17.4% |
| 4 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,542 | +15.2% |
| 5 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 1,191 | +38.2% |
| 6 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 1,138 | +38.3% |
| 7 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 966 | +59.4% |
| 8 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 766 | -29.5% |
| 9 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 763 | +48.7% |
| 10 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 741 | +64.7% |
| 11 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 722 | +28.7% |
| 12 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 717 | +26.9% |
| 13 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 680 | -32.3% |
| 14 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 660 | +11.3% |
| 15 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 649 | +44.9% |
| 16 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 614 | +19.9% |
| 17 | Chino, CA Estimated | 590 | +59.5% |
| 18 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 564 | -3.6% |
| 19 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 562 | +22.7% |
| 20 | Chula Vista, CA Estimated | 533 | +519.8% |
| 21 | Hollister, CA Estimated | 519 | +56.8% |
| 22 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 517 | -15.7% |
| 23 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 506 | -9.5% |
| 24 | Moreno Valley, CA Estimated | 451 | +351% |
| 25 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 440 | +2.6% |
| 26 | Sunnyvale, CA Estimated | 416 | +77.8% |
| 27 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 414 | -12.7% |
| 28 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 402 | -11.6% |
| 29 | San Marcos, CA Estimated | 395 | +393.8% |
| 30 | Milpitas, CA Estimated | 383 | +268.3% |
| 31 | Chino Hills, CA Estimated | 377 | +216.8% |
| 32 | Eastvale, CA Estimated | 352 | +6% |
| 33 | Indio, CA Estimated | 350 | +44.6% |
| 34 | Camarillo, CA Estimated | 346 | +186% |
| 35 | Carlsbad, CA Estimated | 343 | +23.8% |
| 36 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 326 | -21.3% |
| 37 | Santa Maria, CA Estimated | 320 | +58.4% |
| 38 | Tulare, CA Estimated | 310 | +1.6% |
| 39 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 308 | +18% |
| 39 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA Estimated | 308 | +440.4% |
| 41 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 276 | +86.5% |
| 41 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 276 | -18.1% |
| 43 | Chico, CA Estimated | 273 | -3.2% |
| 44 | Los Banos, CA Estimated | 270 | -17.9% |
| 45 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 268 | +33.3% |
| 46 | Stockton, CA Estimated | 261 | +15% |
| 47 | Tracy, CA Estimated | 255 | -10.8% |
| 48 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 244 | -21.8% |
| 48 | Newark, CA Estimated | 244 | -10.6% |
| 50 | Apple Valley, CA Estimated | 237 | +60.1% |
| 51 | Escondido, CA Estimated | 235 | +190.1% |
| 52 | Hesperia, CA Estimated | 232 | +69.3% |
| 52 | Santa Rosa, CA Estimated | 232 | +123.1% |
| 54 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 217 | -33.4% |
| 55 | Modesto, CA Estimated | 213 | +63.8% |
| 56 | Riverside, CA Estimated | 208 | -5% |
| 57 | Murrieta, CA Estimated | 200 | +39.9% |
| 58 | Santa Ana, CA Estimated | 197 | +32.2% |
| 59 | Costa Mesa, CA Estimated | 196 | +27.3% |
| 60 | Rohnert Park, CA Estimated | 189 | +54.9% |
| 61 | Hanford, CA Estimated | 183 | -43.9% |
| 62 | Lincoln, CA Estimated | 181 | -16.6% |
| 62 | Pomona, CA Estimated | 181 | +141.3% |
| 64 | Morgan Hill, CA Estimated | 178 | +7.2% |
| 65 | San Jose, CA Estimated | 177 | -20.3% |
| 66 | Perris, CA Estimated | 176 | +12.1% |
| 67 | Marina, CA Estimated | 162 | +118.9% |
| 67 | Mountain View, CA Estimated | 162 | +51.4% |
| 67 | Oakley, CA Estimated | 162 | -45.1% |
| 70 | Redondo Beach, CA Estimated | 160 | +30.1% |
| 71 | San Jacinto, CA Estimated | 158 | +8.2% |
| 72 | Lodi, CA Estimated | 157 | -16.9% |
| 73 | Pittsburg, CA Estimated | 154 | +0.7% |
| 73 | Santee, CA Estimated | 154 | +92.5% |
| 73 | Victorville, CA Estimated | 154 | +33.9% |
| 76 | Redding, CA Estimated | 149 | +12% |
| 77 | Santa Barbara, CA Estimated | 146 | +5.8% |
| 78 | Shafter, CA Estimated | 143 | -0.7% |
| 79 | Folsom, CA Estimated | 139 | -8.6% |
| 80 | Downey, CA Estimated | 138 | +213.6% |
| 81 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 137 | -18.5% |
| 82 | Brea, CA Estimated | 134 | -2.2% |
| 83 | Oakland, CA Estimated | 132 | -30.5% |
| 83 | Palm Springs, CA Estimated | 132 | -3.6% |
| 85 | Rio Vista, CA Estimated | 130 | -21.7% |
| 86 | Cypress, CA Estimated | 128 | -3.8% |
| 87 | Davis, CA Estimated | 123 | -28.9% |
| 87 | Woodland, CA Estimated | 123 | -53.2% |
| 89 | Lancaster, CA Estimated | 121 | +33% |
| 90 | Newport Beach, CA Estimated | 119 | +10.2% |
| 90 | Wasco, CA Estimated | 119 | -7.8% |
| 92 | Imperial, CA Estimated | 117 | -20.9% |
| 93 | Madera, CA Estimated | 116 | -37.3% |
| 94 | Encinitas, CA Estimated | 115 | +35.3% |
| 94 | Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 115 | +35.3% |
| 96 | Simi Valley, CA Estimated | 114 | -10.2% |
| 97 | Corona, CA Estimated | 113 | +71.2% |
| 97 | La Quinta, CA Estimated | 113 | +10.8% |
| 99 | La Habra, CA Estimated | 111 | +825% |
| 99 | Oakdale, CA Estimated | 111 | +1.8% |
| 101 | Oxnard, CA Estimated | 108 | +12.5% |
| 101 | San Luis Obispo, CA Estimated | 108 | +16.1% |
| 101 | Truckee, CA Estimated | 108 | +17.4% |
| 104 | Manhattan Beach, CA Estimated | 106 | -8.6% |
| 105 | Oceanside, CA Estimated | 105 | +303.8% |
| 106 | Long Beach, CA Estimated | 104 | +372.7% |
| 107 | Glendora, CA Estimated | 101 | -53.7% |
| 108 | Palmdale, CA Estimated | 97 | -42.6% |
| 109 | Arcadia, CA Estimated | 95 | +26.7% |
| 110 | Newman, CA Estimated | 94 | +100% |
| 110 | San Juan Capistrano, CA Estimated | 94 | +51.6% |
| 112 | Redlands, CA Estimated | 92 | +142.1% |
| 112 | Temple City, CA Estimated | 92 | +9.5% |
| 114 | Adelanto, CA Estimated | 90 | +1,400% |
| 115 | Arvin, CA Estimated | 86 | +132.4% |
| 115 | Temecula, CA Estimated | 86 | -46.6% |
| 117 | Cathedral City, CA Estimated | 85 | +93.2% |
| 118 | Santa Clara, CA Estimated | 83 | +22.1% |
| 118 | Wildomar, CA Estimated | 83 | -52% |
| 120 | San Clemente, CA Estimated | 82 | -18.8% |
| 120 | San Gabriel, CA Estimated | 82 | +12.3% |
| 120 | West Sacramento, CA Estimated | 82 | -19.6% |
| 123 | Yorba Linda, CA Estimated | 79 | -37.3% |
| 124 | Diamond Bar, CA Estimated | 77 | +755.6% |
| 124 | Upland, CA Estimated | 77 | +16.7% |
| 126 | Azusa, CA Estimated | 76 | +20.6% |
| 127 | Merced, CA Estimated | 74 | +5.7% |
| 128 | Anaheim, CA Estimated | 72 | -44.2% |
| 128 | Dinuba, CA Estimated | 72 | +242.9% |
| 128 | Palm Desert, CA Estimated | 72 | -4% |
| 128 | San Mateo, CA Estimated | 72 | +5.9% |
| 132 | Rosemead, CA Estimated | 70 | +125.8% |
| 133 | Concord, CA Estimated | 69 | +360% |
| 133 | Galt, CA Estimated | 69 | -48.5% |
| 133 | Soledad, CA Estimated | 69 | -25.8% |
| 136 | Delano, CA Estimated | 67 | +97.1% |
| 136 | Highland, CA Estimated | 67 | -24.7% |
| 138 | Santa Monica, CA Estimated | 66 | +37.5% |
| 139 | Anderson, CA Estimated | 63 | +110% |
| 139 | Livingston, CA Estimated | 63 | +85.3% |
| 139 | Moorpark, CA Estimated | 63 | -25.9% |
| 139 | Ridgecrest, CA Estimated | 63 | +5% |
| 143 | Rialto, CA Estimated | 61 | |
| 144 | Yuba City, CA Estimated | 59 | +5.4% |
| 145 | Menlo Park, CA Estimated | 58 | +13.7% |
| 146 | Baldwin Park, CA Estimated | 57 | +137.5% |
| 147 | Lemoore, CA Estimated | 55 | -65.4% |
| 147 | Suisun City, CA Estimated | 55 | |
| 147 | Westminster, CA Estimated | 55 | -38.2% |
| 150 | Buena Park, CA Estimated | 54 | -27% |
| 150 | Fillmore, CA Estimated | 54 | -12.9% |
| 152 | Atascadero, CA Estimated | 53 | +381.8% |
| 152 | Cupertino, CA Estimated | 53 | -7% |
| 152 | Huntington Beach, CA Estimated | 53 | +65.6% |
| 155 | Watsonville, CA Estimated | 52 | +6.1% |
| 156 | Arroyo Grande, CA Estimated | 51 | +64.5% |
| 157 | Alhambra, CA Estimated | 50 | +117.4% |
| 157 | El Cajon, CA Estimated | 50 | -51% |
| 159 | Pleasanton, CA Estimated | 48 | -33.3% |
| 160 | Beverly Hills, CA Estimated | 47 | +20.5% |
| 160 | Brawley, CA Estimated | 47 | -11.3% |
| 160 | Culver City, CA Estimated | 47 | +1,466.7% |
| 160 | Patterson, CA Estimated | 47 | +6.8% |
| 160 | Porterville, CA Estimated | 47 | +9.3% |
| 165 | Alameda, CA Estimated | 46 | -22% |
| 165 | Campbell, CA Estimated | 46 | -28.1% |
| 165 | Coalinga, CA Estimated | 46 | +4,500% |
| 165 | Dixon, CA Estimated | 46 | +7% |
| 165 | Napa, CA Estimated | 46 | -62.3% |
| 170 | Antioch, CA Estimated | 45 | +7.1% |
| 170 | Gardena, CA Estimated | 45 | -52.6% |
| 172 | Chowchilla, CA Estimated | 44 | +193.3% |
| 172 | Montclair, CA Estimated | 44 | +25.7% |
| 172 | Walnut, CA Estimated | 44 | -39.7% |
| 175 | Calimesa, CA Estimated | 43 | -17.3% |
| 175 | San Francisco, CA Estimated | 43 | -65% |
| 175 | Vallejo, CA Estimated | 43 | +10.3% |
| 178 | Goleta, CA Estimated | 42 | +1,300% |
| 179 | Dana Point, CA Estimated | 41 | -6.8% |
| 179 | Hercules, CA Estimated | 41 | +36.7% |
| 179 | Kerman, CA Estimated | 41 | -55.4% |
| 179 | Los Altos, CA Estimated | 41 | -21.2% |
| 183 | Auburn, CA Estimated | 40 | +90.5% |
| 183 | Orange, CA Estimated | 40 | +300% |
| 183 | Torrance, CA Estimated | 40 | +25% |
| 183 | Yucaipa, CA Estimated | 40 | +5.3% |
| 187 | Claremont, CA Estimated | 39 | -7.1% |
| 187 | Montebello, CA Estimated | 39 | +3,800% |
| 187 | Santa Cruz, CA Estimated | 39 | -30.4% |
| 187 | Shasta Lake, CA Estimated | 39 | +39.3% |
| 187 | South Lake Tahoe, CA Estimated | 39 | +11.4% |
| 192 | Vista, CA Estimated | 38 | -62% |
| 193 | Mission Viejo, CA Estimated | 37 | +15.6% |
| 193 | Walnut Creek, CA Estimated | 37 | +640% |
| 195 | Berkeley, CA Estimated | 36 | +125% |
| 196 | Desert Hot Springs, CA Estimated | 35 | +20.7% |
| 197 | Hermosa Beach, CA Estimated | 34 | -41.4% |
| 197 | Yucca Valley, CA Estimated | 34 | +88.9% |
| 199 | Coronado, CA Estimated | 33 | -40% |
| 200 | Redwood City, CA Estimated | 32 | 0% |
| 201 | La Mirada, CA Estimated | 31 | |
| 201 | Laguna Beach, CA Estimated | 31 | +47.6% |
| 203 | Bellflower, CA Estimated | 30 | -26.8% |
| 203 | Pasadena, CA Estimated | 30 | -9.1% |
| 203 | Union City, CA Estimated | 30 | +2,900% |
| 206 | Ripon, CA Estimated | 29 | -19.4% |
| 207 | Tehachapi, CA Estimated | 27 | +58.8% |
| 208 | King City, CA Estimated | 26 | -33.3% |
| 208 | Lynwood, CA Estimated | 26 | +333.3% |
| 208 | Monrovia, CA Estimated | 26 | +52.9% |
| 208 | Salinas, CA Estimated | 26 | +1,200% |
| 212 | El Segundo, CA Estimated | 25 | |
| 212 | La Verne, CA Estimated | 25 | +66.7% |
| 212 | Paradise, CA Estimated | 25 | +38.9% |
| 215 | Rancho Mirage, CA Estimated | 24 | -48.9% |
| 215 | Selma, CA Estimated | 24 | -17.2% |
| 215 | Signal Hill, CA Estimated | 24 | +700% |
| 218 | El Monte, CA Estimated | 23 | -69.7% |
| 218 | Kingsburg, CA Estimated | 23 | -54.9% |
| 218 | Los Gatos, CA Estimated | 23 | -54.9% |
| 218 | McFarland, CA Estimated | 23 | -76.3% |
| 222 | Lindsay, CA Estimated | 22 | -15.4% |
| 222 | Morro Bay, CA Estimated | 22 | +37.5% |
| 224 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA Estimated | 21 | -52.3% |
| 224 | Fullerton, CA Estimated | 21 | -16% |
| 224 | Imperial Beach, CA Estimated | 21 | +50% |
| 224 | Red Bluff, CA Estimated | 21 | -12.5% |
| 224 | Sanger, CA Estimated | 21 | -36.4% |
| 224 | Saratoga, CA Estimated | 21 | 0% |
| 224 | Turlock, CA Estimated | 21 | -53.3% |
| 231 | Carson, CA Estimated | 20 | +122.2% |
| 231 | Daly City, CA Estimated | 20 | -80.6% |
| 231 | Mill Valley, CA Estimated | 20 | +400% |
| 231 | Solana Beach, CA Estimated | 20 | +25% |
| 235 | Colton, CA Estimated | 19 | +375% |
| 235 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA Estimated | 19 | +26.7% |
| 237 | Arcata, CA Estimated | 18 | +50% |
| 237 | Citrus Heights, CA Estimated | 18 | +20% |
| 237 | Half Moon Bay, CA Estimated | 18 | +12.5% |
| 237 | Parlier, CA Estimated | 18 | 0% |
| 237 | Petaluma, CA Estimated | 18 | -82.4% |
| 242 | Burbank, CA Estimated | 17 | +6.3% |
| 242 | Ceres, CA Estimated | 17 | -19% |
| 242 | Richmond, CA Estimated | 17 | -74.2% |
| 242 | Thousand Oaks, CA Estimated | 17 | -72.1% |
| 242 | Tustin, CA Estimated | 17 | -87.7% |
| 247 | Danville, CA Estimated | 16 | -5.9% |
| 247 | Fountain Valley, CA Estimated | 16 | +100% |
| 247 | San Bernardino, CA Estimated | 16 | -52.9% |
| 247 | South Gate, CA Estimated | 16 | +45.5% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 3 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2017 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017. U.S. Census Bureau, 1 May 2018, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2018. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2018) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_cities_in_california_by_2017,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017}},
year = {2018},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West\%20Region/we2017a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2017
PY - 2018
DA - 2018/05/01
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2017.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2017a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Los Angeles, CA, with 2,360 in 2017, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Sierra Madre, CA, with 0 in 2017.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 3 cities have no value for 2017 and are not ranked.