Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Los Angeles, CA had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 369 cities in 2015, at 1,834. Whittier, CA had the lowest, at 0. The median was 35. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2015
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2015 | Change on 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 1,834 | +10% |
| 2 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,391 | +8.9% |
| 3 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 1,333 | -14.8% |
| 4 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 1,325 | +86.1% |
| 5 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 967 | +49.9% |
| 6 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 852 | +41.1% |
| 7 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 844 | +31.7% |
| 8 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 665 | +16.5% |
| 9 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 552 | +29.3% |
| 10 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 529 | -35.2% |
| 11 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 494 | +15.7% |
| 12 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 486 | +2.1% |
| 13 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 485 | +6.8% |
| 14 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 456 | +35.7% |
| 15 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 452 | -7.9% |
| 16 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 438 | +71.1% |
| 17 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 417 | +71.6% |
| 18 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 410 | +60.8% |
| 19 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 408 | -16.7% |
| 20 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 403 | +142.8% |
| 21 | Chino, CA Estimated | 396 | +33.3% |
| 22 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 383 | +21.2% |
| 23 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 380 | +27.9% |
| 24 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 369 | +167.4% |
| 25 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 343 | +98.3% |
| 26 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 334 | +370.4% |
| 27 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 322 | +6.3% |
| 28 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 305 | +22% |
| 29 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 301 | +35.6% |
| 30 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 291 | +12.8% |
| 30 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 291 | +120.5% |
| 32 | Tulare, CA Estimated | 278 | +36.9% |
| 33 | Eastvale, CA Estimated | 276 | -35.5% |
| 34 | Indio, CA Estimated | 273 | -47.2% |
| 35 | Chico, CA Estimated | 256 | +27.4% |
| 36 | Morgan Hill, CA Estimated | 253 | -18.6% |
| 37 | Pittsburg, CA Estimated | 251 | +15.7% |
| 38 | Carlsbad, CA Estimated | 247 | -12.7% |
| 39 | Folsom, CA Estimated | 246 | -18% |
| 40 | Oakley, CA Estimated | 235 | +221.9% |
| 41 | Lincoln, CA Estimated | 233 | -18.5% |
| 42 | Costa Mesa, CA Estimated | 229 | +28.7% |
| 43 | Riverside, CA Estimated | 222 | -3.5% |
| 44 | Hanford, CA Estimated | 215 | +76.2% |
| 45 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 206 | -20.2% |
| 45 | Yorba Linda, CA Estimated | 206 | +119.1% |
| 47 | Tracy, CA Estimated | 193 | +43% |
| 48 | Redding, CA Estimated | 191 | +70.5% |
| 49 | Sunnyvale, CA Estimated | 189 | -3.6% |
| 50 | Moorpark, CA Estimated | 183 | +2.8% |
| 51 | Murrieta, CA Estimated | 182 | +1,037.5% |
| 52 | Shafter, CA Estimated | 181 | +72.4% |
| 53 | Buena Park, CA Estimated | 176 | +17,500% |
| 54 | La Quinta, CA Estimated | 173 | -0.6% |
| 55 | Stockton, CA Estimated | 157 | +106.6% |
| 56 | San Jose, CA Estimated | 155 | -59.6% |
| 56 | Santa Maria, CA Estimated | 155 | +19.2% |
| 58 | Woodland, CA Estimated | 153 | +19.5% |
| 59 | Rio Vista, CA Estimated | 151 | +22.8% |
| 59 | San Luis Obispo, CA Estimated | 151 | +8.6% |
| 61 | Madera, CA Estimated | 145 | -7.1% |
| 62 | Redondo Beach, CA Estimated | 143 | +40.2% |
| 62 | Temecula, CA Estimated | 143 | -38.9% |
| 64 | Encinitas, CA Estimated | 142 | -9.6% |
| 65 | Perris, CA Estimated | 141 | +18.5% |
| 66 | Moreno Valley, CA Estimated | 132 | +187% |
| 67 | Huntington Beach, CA Estimated | 131 | +151.9% |
| 68 | Lemoore, CA Estimated | 128 | +21.9% |
| 69 | Hollister, CA Estimated | 121 | +59.2% |
| 69 | Palm Springs, CA Estimated | 121 | -37.6% |
| 71 | Alameda, CA Estimated | 118 | +2,260% |
| 71 | Vista, CA Estimated | 118 | +118.5% |
| 73 | San Clemente, CA Estimated | 117 | +82.8% |
| 73 | Santa Clara, CA Estimated | 117 | +108.9% |
| 73 | Temple City, CA Estimated | 117 | +12.5% |
| 76 | Adelanto, CA Estimated | 116 | +241.2% |
| 77 | Dinuba, CA Estimated | 115 | +379.2% |
| 78 | Diamond Bar, CA Estimated | 114 | +159.1% |
| 79 | San Jacinto, CA Estimated | 113 | +101.8% |
| 79 | Wildomar, CA Estimated | 113 | +3,666.7% |
| 81 | San Mateo, CA Estimated | 112 | +16.7% |
| 82 | Azusa, CA Estimated | 111 | -62.6% |
| 83 | Apple Valley, CA Estimated | 110 | -12% |
| 84 | Daly City, CA Estimated | 109 | +1,111.1% |
| 84 | Oakland, CA Estimated | 109 | +34.6% |
| 84 | Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 109 | +25.3% |
| 87 | Brea, CA Estimated | 107 | -16.4% |
| 87 | Chino Hills, CA Estimated | 107 | +167.5% |
| 87 | Palm Desert, CA Estimated | 107 | -48.6% |
| 90 | El Cajon, CA Estimated | 105 | +275% |
| 90 | Tustin, CA Estimated | 105 | +3,400% |
| 92 | Novato, CA Estimated | 104 | +15.6% |
| 93 | Simi Valley, CA Estimated | 103 | +3,333.3% |
| 94 | West Covina, CA Estimated | 101 | +461.1% |
| 95 | Hesperia, CA Estimated | 100 | +33.3% |
| 95 | Manhattan Beach, CA Estimated | 100 | +4.2% |
| 95 | Palmdale, CA Estimated | 100 | +138.1% |
| 98 | Newport Beach, CA Estimated | 99 | +17.9% |
| 98 | Santa Rosa, CA Estimated | 99 | -46.2% |
| 100 | Napa, CA Estimated | 98 | +292% |
| 101 | Newark, CA Estimated | 97 | +273.1% |
| 102 | Lancaster, CA Estimated | 95 | +2.2% |
| 103 | Pleasanton, CA Estimated | 94 | +20.5% |
| 104 | Milpitas, CA Estimated | 92 | -27.6% |
| 104 | Oakdale, CA Estimated | 92 | +21.1% |
| 106 | Hemet, CA Estimated | 91 | -34.1% |
| 106 | San Marcos, CA Estimated | 91 | -4.2% |
| 108 | Chula Vista, CA Estimated | 90 | -58.1% |
| 108 | Glendora, CA Estimated | 90 | +2,150% |
| 110 | Oxnard, CA Estimated | 89 | +25.4% |
| 111 | Camarillo, CA Estimated | 88 | -3.3% |
| 112 | Victorville, CA Estimated | 83 | +80.4% |
| 113 | Dixon, CA Estimated | 80 | +247.8% |
| 114 | Davis, CA Estimated | 79 | +777.8% |
| 115 | McFarland, CA Estimated | 78 | +21.9% |
| 116 | Mountain View, CA Estimated | 77 | -27.4% |
| 117 | Richmond, CA Estimated | 76 | +850% |
| 117 | San Gabriel, CA Estimated | 76 | +216.7% |
| 119 | Lemon Grove, CA Estimated | 75 | +240.9% |
| 119 | Truckee, CA Estimated | 75 | -13.8% |
| 121 | Arvin, CA Estimated | 72 | +22% |
| 121 | Lakewood, CA Estimated | 72 | |
| 121 | Wasco, CA Estimated | 72 | +200% |
| 121 | Westminster, CA Estimated | 72 | +300% |
| 125 | Galt, CA Estimated | 71 | -1.4% |
| 126 | Antioch, CA Estimated | 68 | -18.1% |
| 126 | Arcadia, CA Estimated | 68 | +15.3% |
| 128 | Upland, CA Estimated | 67 | +24.1% |
| 129 | San Francisco, CA Estimated | 64 | +82.9% |
| 130 | Danville, CA Estimated | 63 | +117.2% |
| 131 | Selma, CA Estimated | 62 | +416.7% |
| 132 | Atascadero, CA Estimated | 61 | -56.7% |
| 132 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA Estimated | 61 | 0% |
| 134 | Hermosa Beach, CA Estimated | 59 | +3.5% |
| 134 | West Sacramento, CA Estimated | 59 | -3.3% |
| 136 | Porterville, CA Estimated | 58 | +81.3% |
| 136 | Redlands, CA Estimated | 58 | 0% |
| 136 | Turlock, CA Estimated | 58 | -38.9% |
| 139 | Barstow, CA Estimated | 57 | +14% |
| 139 | Coronado, CA Estimated | 57 | +54.1% |
| 139 | Santa Cruz, CA Estimated | 57 | +14% |
| 142 | Merced, CA Estimated | 56 | +21.7% |
| 142 | Petaluma, CA Estimated | 56 | +273.3% |
| 144 | Martinez, CA Estimated | 54 | +42.1% |
| 144 | Ripon, CA Estimated | 54 | +217.6% |
| 146 | East Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 53 | +2,550% |
| 146 | Marina, CA Estimated | 53 | +381.8% |
| 146 | Riverbank, CA Estimated | 53 | +65.6% |
| 149 | Cupertino, CA Estimated | 52 | +26.8% |
| 149 | Monterey Park, CA Estimated | 52 | +92.6% |
| 151 | Imperial, CA Estimated | 51 | -56% |
| 151 | Redwood City, CA Estimated | 51 | +410% |
| 151 | Santa Fe Springs, CA Estimated | 51 | +750% |
| 151 | Santa Monica, CA Estimated | 51 | +24.4% |
| 155 | Campbell, CA Estimated | 50 | +31.6% |
| 155 | Fillmore, CA Estimated | 50 | +22% |
| 157 | Dana Point, CA Estimated | 49 | +25.6% |
| 157 | Menlo Park, CA Estimated | 49 | 0% |
| 159 | San Juan Capistrano, CA Estimated | 48 | -18.6% |
| 159 | South El Monte, CA Estimated | 48 | -40% |
| 161 | Union City, CA Estimated | 47 | +4,600% |
| 162 | Salinas, CA Estimated | 46 | +53.3% |
| 163 | Yuba City, CA Estimated | 45 | -4.3% |
| 164 | Brawley, CA Estimated | 44 | +91.3% |
| 165 | Lompoc, CA Estimated | 43 | +95.5% |
| 165 | Placentia, CA Estimated | 43 | +16.2% |
| 167 | Los Altos, CA Estimated | 42 | +20% |
| 167 | Newman, CA Estimated | 42 | +147.1% |
| 169 | Healdsburg, CA Estimated | 41 | +46.4% |
| 170 | Fullerton, CA Estimated | 40 | -72.8% |
| 171 | El Monte, CA Estimated | 39 | -9.3% |
| 171 | Los Banos, CA Estimated | 39 | +21.9% |
| 171 | Rancho Mirage, CA Estimated | 39 | +2.6% |
| 171 | Santa Ana, CA Estimated | 39 | -58.9% |
| 171 | Thousand Oaks, CA Estimated | 39 | +143.8% |
| 171 | Watsonville, CA Estimated | 39 | +25.8% |
| 177 | San Bernardino, CA Estimated | 38 | -60% |
| 178 | La Mirada, CA Estimated | 37 | +5.7% |
| 178 | San Pablo, CA Estimated | 37 | +19.4% |
| 180 | Anaheim, CA Estimated | 36 | -29.4% |
| 180 | Corcoran, CA Estimated | 36 | +20% |
| 180 | Oceanside, CA Estimated | 36 | -58.1% |
| 183 | Ceres, CA Estimated | 35 | -32.7% |
| 183 | Paradise, CA Estimated | 35 | +59.1% |
| 183 | Patterson, CA Estimated | 35 | +20.7% |
| 186 | Coachella, CA Estimated | 34 | -32% |
| 187 | Gardena, CA Estimated | 33 | +50% |
| 187 | Stanton, CA Estimated | 33 | -36.5% |
| 189 | Lindsay, CA Estimated | 32 | +60% |
| 189 | Sanger, CA Estimated | 32 | +100% |
| 191 | Beverly Hills, CA Estimated | 30 | 0% |
| 191 | Kerman, CA Estimated | 30 | +150% |
| 191 | San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA Estimated | 30 | -3.2% |
| 191 | Santa Barbara, CA Estimated | 30 | +328.6% |
| 191 | Walnut Creek, CA Estimated | 30 | +114.3% |
| 196 | Carson, CA Estimated | 29 | +3.6% |
| 196 | Montclair, CA Estimated | 29 | +190% |
| 196 | Rosemead, CA Estimated | 29 | +625% |
| 196 | South Lake Tahoe, CA Estimated | 29 | +3.6% |
| 200 | Calimesa, CA Estimated | 28 | -3.4% |
| 200 | Corona, CA Estimated | 28 | -6.7% |
| 200 | Grover Beach, CA Estimated | 28 | +115.4% |
| 200 | Rancho Palos Verdes, CA Estimated | 28 | +250% |
| 204 | Los Gatos, CA Estimated | 27 | -30.8% |
| 204 | San Rafael, CA Estimated | 27 | +2,600% |
| 204 | Vallejo, CA Estimated | 27 | +58.8% |
| 207 | Desert Hot Springs, CA Estimated | 26 | |
| 207 | Foster City, CA Estimated | 26 | |
| 207 | Pasadena, CA Estimated | 26 | +73.3% |
| 210 | Bellflower, CA Estimated | 25 | -65.8% |
| 210 | Concord, CA Estimated | 25 | +257.1% |
| 210 | Santee, CA Estimated | 25 | +525% |
| 213 | Anderson, CA Estimated | 24 | +14.3% |
| 213 | Cathedral City, CA Estimated | 24 | -25% |
| 213 | Morro Bay, CA Estimated | 24 | +140% |
| 216 | Claremont, CA Estimated | 23 | -77.9% |
| 216 | La Mesa, CA Estimated | 23 | -45.2% |
| 216 | Placerville, CA Estimated | 23 | +130% |
| 219 | Shasta Lake, CA Estimated | 22 | +10% |
| 220 | Baldwin Park, CA Estimated | 21 | +23.5% |
| 220 | Citrus Heights, CA Estimated | 21 | +16.7% |
| 220 | Ridgecrest, CA Estimated | 21 | +162.5% |
| 220 | Rohnert Park, CA Estimated | 21 | |
| 224 | Arcata, CA Estimated | 20 | +185.7% |
| 224 | Escondido, CA Estimated | 20 | +17.6% |
| 224 | Garden Grove, CA Estimated | 20 | -9.1% |
| 224 | La Habra, CA Estimated | 20 | +5.3% |
| 224 | Lodi, CA Estimated | 20 | +25% |
| 224 | Lomita, CA Estimated | 20 | +25% |
| 224 | Long Beach, CA Estimated | 20 | -20% |
| 231 | Red Bluff, CA Estimated | 19 | -9.5% |
| 232 | Downey, CA Estimated | 18 | -57.1% |
| 232 | La CaƱada Flintridge, CA Estimated | 18 | +157.1% |
| 234 | Half Moon Bay, CA Estimated | 17 | +30.8% |
| 234 | Modesto, CA Estimated | 17 | +41.7% |
| 234 | Yucca Valley, CA Estimated | 17 | -5.6% |
| 237 | Laguna Beach, CA Estimated | 16 | -27.3% |
| 237 | Sonoma, CA Estimated | 16 | +128.6% |
| 237 | Walnut, CA Estimated | 16 | +14.3% |
| 240 | Arroyo Grande, CA Estimated | 15 | -66.7% |
| 240 | Colton, CA Estimated | 15 | -16.7% |
| 240 | Greenfield, CA Estimated | 15 | +87.5% |
| 240 | Hillsborough, CA Estimated | 15 | +7.1% |
| 240 | Oroville, CA Estimated | 15 | -6.3% |
| 245 | Burlingame, CA Estimated | 14 | -26.3% |
| 245 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA Estimated | 14 | +27.3% |
| 247 | Bell Gardens, CA Estimated | 13 | +30% |
| 247 | Grand Terrace, CA Estimated | 13 | +550% |
| 247 | Pomona, CA Estimated | 13 | -62.9% |
| 250 | Berkeley, CA Estimated | 12 | -40% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 3 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2015 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, 30 Sept. 2016, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2016. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2016) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_cities_in_california_by_2015,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015}},
year = {2016},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West\%20Region/we2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2015
PY - 2016
DA - 2016/09/30
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2015.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2015a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Los Angeles, CA, with 1,834 in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Whittier, CA, with 0 in 2015.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 3 cities have no value for 2015 and are not ranked.