Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits
Los Angeles, CA had the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits of 369 cities in 2019, at 2,647. Sierra Madre, CA had the lowest, at 0. The median was 42. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 cities, 2019
Full ranking
| Rank | Cities | 2019 | Change on 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA Estimated | 2,647 | +0.4% |
| 2 | Sacramento, CA Estimated | 1,538 | -4.5% |
| 3 | Bakersfield, CA Estimated | 1,419 | +33.7% |
| 4 | Ontario, CA Estimated | 1,167 | +10.5% |
| 5 | Fresno, CA Estimated | 1,153 | +40.4% |
| 6 | Menifee, CA Estimated | 1,017 | +4.2% |
| 7 | Roseville, CA Estimated | 998 | +23.5% |
| 8 | Santa Rosa, CA Estimated | 939 | -42.5% |
| 9 | Irvine, CA Estimated | 918 | -50.8% |
| 10 | Elk Grove, CA Estimated | 764 | +10.2% |
| 11 | Clovis, CA Estimated | 760 | -14.8% |
| 12 | Hayward, CA Estimated | 695 | +144.7% |
| 13 | Visalia, CA Estimated | 678 | +30.1% |
| 14 | Merced, CA Estimated | 668 | +767.5% |
| 15 | Fontana, CA Estimated | 642 | +55.4% |
| 16 | Tracy, CA Estimated | 597 | -7.3% |
| 17 | San Diego, CA Estimated | 580 | -25.1% |
| 18 | Rancho Cordova, CA Estimated | 561 | +158.5% |
| 19 | Beaumont, CA Estimated | 535 | -21.8% |
| 20 | Chino, CA Estimated | 531 | +21.5% |
| 21 | Manteca, CA Estimated | 517 | +0.2% |
| 22 | San Jose, CA Estimated | 514 | +116% |
| 23 | Folsom, CA Estimated | 453 | +6.8% |
| 24 | Rocklin, CA Estimated | 439 | -25% |
| 24 | Victorville, CA Estimated | 439 | +64.4% |
| 26 | Hollister, CA Estimated | 417 | +12.4% |
| 27 | Lathrop, CA Estimated | 398 | +8.4% |
| 28 | Santa Clarita, CA Estimated | 389 | +4.6% |
| 29 | Woodland, CA Estimated | 386 | +83.8% |
| 30 | Vacaville, CA Estimated | 378 | +92.9% |
| 31 | Tulare, CA Estimated | 368 | +5.1% |
| 32 | Lake Forest, CA Estimated | 358 | +51.1% |
| 33 | Jurupa Valley, CA Estimated | 355 | +0.6% |
| 34 | Fairfield, CA Estimated | 348 | +10.8% |
| 35 | Brentwood, CA Estimated | 323 | -0.3% |
| 36 | Moreno Valley, CA Estimated | 315 | -63.1% |
| 37 | Lake Elsinore, CA Estimated | 314 | -23% |
| 38 | Paradise, CA Estimated | 312 | +1,100% |
| 39 | Stockton, CA Estimated | 302 | -6.8% |
| 40 | Eastvale, CA Estimated | 301 | +189.4% |
| 41 | Chico, CA Estimated | 293 | -14.1% |
| 42 | Calimesa, CA Estimated | 286 | +207.5% |
| 43 | Chula Vista, CA Estimated | 282 | -45.2% |
| 43 | Oakland, CA Estimated | 282 | +22.6% |
| 45 | Newark, CA Estimated | 266 | -5.3% |
| 46 | Oakley, CA Estimated | 262 | +42.4% |
| 47 | Indio, CA Estimated | 261 | -18.9% |
| 48 | Lincoln, CA Estimated | 260 | +182.6% |
| 49 | Santa Clara, CA Estimated | 257 | +56.7% |
| 50 | Vista, CA Estimated | 242 | +34.4% |
| 51 | Tustin, CA Estimated | 238 | +296.7% |
| 52 | Dinuba, CA Estimated | 236 | +143.3% |
| 53 | Antioch, CA Estimated | 232 | +268.3% |
| 54 | Carlsbad, CA Estimated | 227 | -12% |
| 54 | Redding, CA Estimated | 227 | +120.4% |
| 56 | Corona, CA Estimated | 216 | +20% |
| 57 | Hanford, CA Estimated | 210 | +15.4% |
| 58 | Lancaster, CA Estimated | 207 | +102.9% |
| 59 | Hesperia, CA Estimated | 200 | -19.7% |
| 59 | Palm Springs, CA Estimated | 200 | +60% |
| 61 | Modesto, CA Estimated | 195 | -12.6% |
| 61 | Rohnert Park, CA Estimated | 195 | -26.1% |
| 63 | Rancho Mirage, CA Estimated | 194 | -0.5% |
| 64 | Gilroy, CA Estimated | 191 | +50.4% |
| 65 | Cypress, CA Estimated | 190 | +9.8% |
| 65 | Shafter, CA Estimated | 190 | +38.7% |
| 67 | Encinitas, CA Estimated | 185 | +17.8% |
| 68 | Imperial, CA Estimated | 178 | -4.3% |
| 69 | San Marcos, CA Estimated | 172 | +28.4% |
| 70 | Madera, CA Estimated | 171 | -3.9% |
| 70 | San Luis Obispo, CA Estimated | 171 | +40.2% |
| 72 | Riverside, CA Estimated | 170 | -0.6% |
| 73 | Fremont, CA Estimated | 169 | +6.3% |
| 73 | Garden Grove, CA Estimated | 169 | +52.3% |
| 75 | Murrieta, CA Estimated | 162 | -59.2% |
| 76 | West Sacramento, CA Estimated | 161 | +91.7% |
| 77 | Huntington Beach, CA Estimated | 154 | +190.6% |
| 78 | El Cajon, CA Estimated | 149 | +47.5% |
| 78 | Rio Vista, CA Estimated | 149 | -45.6% |
| 80 | San Jacinto, CA Estimated | 147 | -7% |
| 80 | Sunnyvale, CA Estimated | 147 | -46.4% |
| 82 | Goleta, CA Estimated | 146 | +231.8% |
| 82 | Santa Paula, CA Estimated | 146 | +4,766.7% |
| 84 | Dublin, CA Estimated | 145 | -76.4% |
| 85 | Cathedral City, CA Estimated | 142 | +54.3% |
| 85 | Simi Valley, CA Estimated | 142 | +57.8% |
| 87 | La Quinta, CA Estimated | 139 | +9.4% |
| 88 | Glendale, CA Estimated | 138 | +53.3% |
| 89 | Perris, CA Estimated | 137 | +19.1% |
| 89 | Rancho Cucamonga, CA Estimated | 137 | +7.9% |
| 91 | Upland, CA Estimated | 134 | -16.3% |
| 92 | Morgan Hill, CA Estimated | 133 | -38.4% |
| 93 | Milpitas, CA Estimated | 131 | -68.4% |
| 94 | Newport Beach, CA Estimated | 125 | -3.8% |
| 95 | Anaheim, CA Estimated | 123 | +1.7% |
| 96 | Arvin, CA Estimated | 121 | +13.1% |
| 97 | Lodi, CA Estimated | 119 | -51.8% |
| 98 | Stanton, CA Estimated | 114 | +119.2% |
| 99 | Redlands, CA Estimated | 113 | +22.8% |
| 100 | Santa Maria, CA Estimated | 110 | -30.4% |
| 101 | Yorba Linda, CA Estimated | 108 | -23.9% |
| 102 | Dixon, CA Estimated | 105 | +23.5% |
| 103 | Porterville, CA Estimated | 104 | +40.5% |
| 103 | Turlock, CA Estimated | 104 | +131.1% |
| 105 | Palo Alto, CA Estimated | 102 | -7.3% |
| 106 | Apple Valley, CA Estimated | 101 | +27.8% |
| 107 | Long Beach, CA Estimated | 100 | -21.9% |
| 107 | Napa, CA Estimated | 100 | +104.1% |
| 109 | Pittsburg, CA Estimated | 99 | +41.4% |
| 110 | Pomona, CA Estimated | 98 | -48.1% |
| 111 | Santa Ana, CA Estimated | 97 | -20.5% |
| 112 | Manhattan Beach, CA Estimated | 96 | -20.7% |
| 113 | Los Banos, CA Estimated | 95 | -66.5% |
| 114 | Fillmore, CA Estimated | 94 | +64.9% |
| 114 | Redondo Beach, CA Estimated | 94 | -10.5% |
| 116 | Truckee, CA Estimated | 91 | -10.8% |
| 117 | Palm Desert, CA Estimated | 88 | +44.3% |
| 118 | San Juan Capistrano, CA Estimated | 87 | +102.3% |
| 119 | Arcadia, CA Estimated | 85 | +7.6% |
| 120 | Dana Point, CA Estimated | 82 | -3.5% |
| 120 | Lemoore, CA Estimated | 82 | 0% |
| 122 | Berkeley, CA Estimated | 80 | +21.2% |
| 122 | Salinas, CA Estimated | 80 | +40.4% |
| 124 | Mountain View, CA Estimated | 79 | +9.7% |
| 125 | Torrance, CA Estimated | 78 | +77.3% |
| 126 | Chino Hills, CA Estimated | 76 | -67.1% |
| 126 | Hemet, CA Estimated | 76 | +20.6% |
| 126 | Temple City, CA Estimated | 76 | -8.4% |
| 129 | Novato, CA Estimated | 75 | +435.7% |
| 129 | Orange, CA Estimated | 75 | +212.5% |
| 129 | Rosemead, CA Estimated | 75 | +15.4% |
| 132 | Costa Mesa, CA Estimated | 74 | -54.6% |
| 132 | San Ramon, CA Estimated | 74 | -53.8% |
| 132 | Santa Monica, CA Estimated | 74 | +7.2% |
| 132 | Westminster, CA Estimated | 74 | -3.9% |
| 136 | Palmdale, CA Estimated | 73 | +12.3% |
| 137 | Daly City, CA Estimated | 72 | +300% |
| 137 | Soledad, CA Estimated | 72 | 0% |
| 137 | Sonoma, CA Estimated | 72 | +620% |
| 140 | Kerman, CA Estimated | 71 | -22.8% |
| 140 | Oceanside, CA Estimated | 71 | -41.8% |
| 140 | Pleasanton, CA Estimated | 71 | +69% |
| 140 | San Fernando, CA Estimated | 71 | +545.5% |
| 144 | Coalinga, CA Estimated | 70 | +66.7% |
| 144 | Delano, CA Estimated | 70 | -36.9% |
| 144 | Ripon, CA Estimated | 70 | -14.6% |
| 147 | Cupertino, CA Estimated | 68 | +65.9% |
| 147 | Wasco, CA Estimated | 68 | -45.6% |
| 149 | Livingston, CA Estimated | 67 | -35% |
| 150 | Colton, CA Estimated | 65 | -20.7% |
| 151 | Adelanto, CA Estimated | 63 | +293.8% |
| 151 | Oxnard, CA Estimated | 63 | +61.5% |
| 153 | Highland, CA Estimated | 62 | -4.6% |
| 154 | Alameda, CA Estimated | 61 | +96.8% |
| 154 | Ceres, CA Estimated | 61 | +64.9% |
| 156 | Oroville, CA Estimated | 60 | +566.7% |
| 157 | San Bernardino, CA Estimated | 59 | -4.8% |
| 158 | Galt, CA Estimated | 57 | +72.7% |
| 158 | West Covina, CA Estimated | 57 | +533.3% |
| 160 | Newman, CA Estimated | 56 | 0% |
| 161 | Watsonville, CA Estimated | 55 | 0% |
| 162 | Saratoga, CA Estimated | 54 | +35% |
| 162 | Temecula, CA Estimated | 54 | -40% |
| 162 | Vallejo, CA Estimated | 54 | +5.9% |
| 165 | Livermore, CA Estimated | 53 | -57.3% |
| 165 | Los Altos, CA Estimated | 53 | +29.3% |
| 167 | Brawley, CA Estimated | 52 | +2% |
| 167 | Parlier, CA Estimated | 52 | +188.9% |
| 167 | Sanger, CA Estimated | 52 | -10.3% |
| 170 | Campbell, CA Estimated | 51 | -19% |
| 171 | Richmond, CA Estimated | 50 | -47.9% |
| 171 | Ridgecrest, CA Estimated | 50 | -46.8% |
| 173 | Camarillo, CA Estimated | 49 | -81.1% |
| 173 | Corcoran, CA Estimated | 49 | +1,533.3% |
| 173 | Menlo Park, CA Estimated | 49 | -12.5% |
| 173 | Patterson, CA Estimated | 49 | 0% |
| 173 | Yuba City, CA Estimated | 49 | +75% |
| 178 | Petaluma, CA Estimated | 47 | +20.5% |
| 179 | Yucaipa, CA Estimated | 46 | -4.2% |
| 180 | Burbank, CA Estimated | 43 | +152.9% |
| 180 | Gardena, CA Estimated | 43 | -56.1% |
| 180 | San Clemente, CA Estimated | 43 | -55.7% |
| 183 | Hermosa Beach, CA Estimated | 42 | -4.5% |
| 183 | Rialto, CA Estimated | 42 | -35.4% |
| 183 | Santa Cruz, CA Estimated | 42 | -4.5% |
| 183 | Shasta Lake, CA Estimated | 42 | +16.7% |
| 187 | Glendora, CA Estimated | 41 | -18% |
| 187 | Redwood City, CA Estimated | 41 | +2.5% |
| 187 | South Gate, CA Estimated | 41 | +46.4% |
| 190 | Brea, CA Estimated | 40 | +566.7% |
| 190 | Danville, CA Estimated | 40 | +66.7% |
| 192 | Alhambra, CA Estimated | 39 | +14.7% |
| 192 | Anderson, CA Estimated | 39 | +34.5% |
| 194 | Concord, CA Estimated | 38 | +111.1% |
| 195 | Atascadero, CA Estimated | 35 | +20.7% |
| 195 | El Monte, CA Estimated | 35 | -10.3% |
| 195 | Pasadena, CA Estimated | 35 | +12.9% |
| 198 | El Cerrito, CA Estimated | 34 | +1,600% |
| 198 | Marina, CA Estimated | 34 | -83.4% |
| 198 | San Leandro, CA Estimated | 34 | +1,600% |
| 201 | Kingsburg, CA Estimated | 33 | +83.3% |
| 201 | Yucca Valley, CA Estimated | 33 | -36.5% |
| 203 | Arroyo Grande, CA Estimated | 32 | -8.6% |
| 203 | South San Francisco, CA Estimated | 32 | +3,100% |
| 205 | Grover Beach, CA Estimated | 31 | +121.4% |
| 205 | Thousand Oaks, CA Estimated | 31 | +72.2% |
| 207 | Compton, CA Estimated | 29 | +383.3% |
| 207 | La Habra, CA Estimated | 29 | -6.5% |
| 207 | South El Monte, CA Estimated | 29 | +314.3% |
| 210 | Davis, CA Estimated | 28 | -40.4% |
| 211 | Arcata, CA Estimated | 27 | +12.5% |
| 212 | Hawthorne, CA Estimated | 26 | -27.8% |
| 212 | Healdsburg, CA Estimated | 26 | +8.3% |
| 212 | Morro Bay, CA Estimated | 26 | -33.3% |
| 212 | Selma, CA Estimated | 26 | 0% |
| 216 | Claremont, CA Estimated | 25 | -34.2% |
| 216 | Los Gatos, CA Estimated | 25 | -19.4% |
| 216 | Mill Valley, CA Estimated | 25 | +47.1% |
| 216 | Whittier, CA Estimated | 25 | +733.3% |
| 216 | Windsor, CA Estimated | 25 | +525% |
| 221 | El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles), CA Estimated | 24 | +14.3% |
| 221 | Fountain Valley, CA Estimated | 24 | +118.2% |
| 221 | Grass Valley, CA Estimated | 24 | +166.7% |
| 224 | Escondido, CA Estimated | 23 | +15% |
| 224 | Fullerton, CA Estimated | 23 | +21.1% |
| 226 | Coronado, CA Estimated | 22 | -31.3% |
| 226 | Desert Hot Springs, CA Estimated | 22 | -43.6% |
| 226 | Duarte, CA Estimated | 22 | |
| 226 | Laguna Beach, CA Estimated | 22 | +37.5% |
| 226 | San Francisco, CA Estimated | 22 | -21.4% |
| 231 | Palos Verdes Estates, CA Estimated | 21 | -4.5% |
| 232 | Burlingame, CA Estimated | 20 | -39.4% |
| 232 | Downey, CA Estimated | 20 | -64.3% |
| 232 | Fortuna, CA Estimated | 20 | 0% |
| 232 | Foster City, CA Estimated | 20 | |
| 232 | Pleasant Hill, CA Estimated | 20 | -45.9% |
| 232 | Poway, CA Estimated | 20 | +42.9% |
| 232 | San Dimas, CA Estimated | 20 | +900% |
| 239 | King City, CA Estimated | 19 | -55.8% |
| 239 | Loma Linda, CA Estimated | 19 | -13.6% |
| 241 | Grand Terrace, CA Estimated | 18 | -5.3% |
| 241 | Imperial Beach, CA Estimated | 18 | -48.6% |
| 241 | La Puente, CA Estimated | 18 | -56.1% |
| 241 | Monrovia, CA Estimated | 18 | -25% |
| 245 | Avenal, CA Estimated | 17 | +6.3% |
| 245 | Beverly Hills, CA Estimated | 17 | -61.4% |
| 245 | Clearlake, CA Estimated | 17 | +142.9% |
| 245 | Walnut Creek, CA Estimated | 17 | -37% |
| 249 | Diamond Bar, CA Estimated | 16 | -48.4% |
| 249 | Lomita, CA Estimated | 16 | +700% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Annual number of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures (detached and attached single-family homes) authorized by building permits, from the US Census Bureau Building Permits Survey.
Part of building_permit_units, which also counts units in buildings with two or more units. Counts housing units, not starts, completions or sales.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the cities are compared on one definition. 3 cities with data in other periods have no value for 2019 and are left out rather than filled from another source. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2020). Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation (Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt
MLA 9
Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019. U.S. Census Bureau, 1 May 2020, https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2020) Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation, Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_cities_in_california_by_2019,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019}},
year = {2020},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West\%20Region/we2019a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation: Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits, 2019
PY - 2020
DA - 2020/05/01
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/single-family-building-permits/california-cities?period=2019.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. https://www2.census.gov/econ/bps/Place/West%20Region/we2019a.txt. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Cities in California by single-family housing units authorized by building permits using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"building_permit_single_family_units","level":"municipality","within":"California","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=building_permit_single_family_units&level=municipality&within=California&limit=10
Questions
Which city has the highest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Los Angeles, CA, with 2,647 in 2019, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which city has the lowest single-family housing units authorized by building permits?
Sierra Madre, CA, with 0 in 2019.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Building Permits Survey: final annual estimates of new privately owned housing units in 1-unit structures authorized by permit-issuing place, including imputation. Retrieved 2026-10-12. 3 cities have no value for 2019 and are not ranked.