Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2024, at 97,385. Stephens County had the lowest, at -6. The median was 56 and the figure for Texas was 354,864. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Map of counties, 2024
- Under 0
- 0 to 100
- 100 and over
Top 40 counties, 2024
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2024 | Change on 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 97,385 | +30.8% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 55,809 | +40.8% |
| 3 | Tarrant County Estimated | 25,670 | +50.5% |
| 4 | Travis County Estimated | 25,478 | +39.9% |
| 5 | Bexar County Estimated | 22,913 | +51.7% |
| 6 | Collin County Estimated | 20,379 | +26.4% |
| 7 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 12,012 | +22.1% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 10,565 | +35.6% |
| 9 | Webb County Estimated | 8,592 | +201.8% |
| 10 | El Paso County Estimated | 7,898 | +89.9% |
| 11 | Williamson County Estimated | 7,751 | +47.6% |
| 12 | Montgomery County Estimated | 7,498 | +40.5% |
| 13 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 5,056 | +41.6% |
| 14 | Cameron County Estimated | 3,407 | +51% |
| 15 | Brazos County Estimated | 2,340 | +41.3% |
| 16 | Ector County Estimated | 1,885 | +20.5% |
| 17 | Midland County Estimated | 1,857 | +29.3% |
| 18 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,780 | +24% |
| 19 | Jefferson County Estimated | 1,732 | +65% |
| 20 | Hays County Estimated | 1,721 | +48.9% |
| 21 | Galveston County Estimated | 1,692 | +70.6% |
| 22 | Bell County Estimated | 1,651 | +37.4% |
| 23 | Lubbock County Estimated | 1,558 | +26.6% |
| 24 | Nueces County Estimated | 1,266 | +38.7% |
| 25 | Smith County Estimated | 1,011 | +90.8% |
| 26 | Potter County Estimated | 895 | +19.3% |
| 27 | Johnson County Estimated | 891 | +70% |
| 28 | McLennan County Estimated | 883 | +59.7% |
| 29 | Liberty County Estimated | 800 | +114.5% |
| 30 | Taylor County Estimated | 747 | +3% |
| 31 | Bastrop County Estimated | 652 | +43.9% |
| 31 | Hunt County Estimated | 652 | +124.1% |
| 33 | Kaufman County Estimated | 647 | +25.9% |
| 34 | Waller County Estimated | 618 | +113.1% |
| 35 | Grayson County Estimated | 615 | +93.4% |
| 36 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 607 | +88.5% |
| 37 | San Patricio County Estimated | 548 | +64.6% |
| 38 | Ellis County Estimated | 486 | +8.2% |
| 39 | Moore County Estimated | 474 | +41.9% |
| 40 | Gregg County Estimated | 419 | +54.6% |
| 41 | Parker County Estimated | 417 | +32.8% |
| 42 | Burnet County Estimated | 402 | +112.7% |
| 43 | Caldwell County Estimated | 401 | +53.1% |
| 44 | Wichita County Estimated | 383 | +35.3% |
| 45 | Rockwall County Estimated | 381 | +38% |
| 46 | Randall County Estimated | 344 | +36.5% |
| 47 | Gaines County Estimated | 343 | +376.4% |
| 48 | Bowie County Estimated | 338 | +138% |
| 49 | Hood County Estimated | 334 | +145.6% |
| 50 | Comal County Estimated | 296 | +93.5% |
| 50 | Walker County Estimated | 296 | +41.6% |
| 52 | Tom Green County Estimated | 285 | +55.7% |
| 53 | Maverick County Estimated | 266 | +19.8% |
| 54 | Val Verde County Estimated | 249 | +72.9% |
| 55 | Victoria County Estimated | 247 | +171.4% |
| 56 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 234 | +207.9% |
| 57 | Austin County Estimated | 233 | +117.8% |
| 57 | Matagorda County Estimated | 233 | +48.4% |
| 59 | Angelina County Estimated | 226 | +41.3% |
| 60 | Titus County Estimated | 223 | +84.3% |
| 61 | Howard County Estimated | 220 | +33.3% |
| 62 | Coryell County Estimated | 217 | +11.9% |
| 62 | Harrison County Estimated | 217 | +128.4% |
| 64 | Kendall County Estimated | 215 | +69.3% |
| 65 | Dallam County Estimated | 212 | +21.1% |
| 66 | Kerr County Estimated | 204 | +148.8% |
| 67 | Hopkins County Estimated | 195 | +112% |
| 68 | Washington County Estimated | 194 | +102.1% |
| 69 | Orange County Estimated | 181 | +50.8% |
| 70 | Cooke County Estimated | 178 | +169.7% |
| 71 | Gillespie County Estimated | 175 | +68.3% |
| 72 | Wilson County Estimated | 174 | +33.8% |
| 73 | Wood County Estimated | 155 | +74.2% |
| 74 | Navarro County Estimated | 154 | +46.7% |
| 75 | Reeves County Estimated | 153 | +37.8% |
| 76 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 152 | +74.7% |
| 77 | Young County Estimated | 151 | +109.7% |
| 78 | Bailey County Estimated | 143 | +13.5% |
| 79 | Parmer County Estimated | 142 | +97.2% |
| 80 | Concho County Estimated | 140 | -9.1% |
| 81 | Llano County Estimated | 137 | +104.5% |
| 82 | Anderson County Estimated | 136 | -11.1% |
| 83 | Kleberg County Estimated | 131 | +33.7% |
| 84 | Hale County Estimated | 128 | +43.8% |
| 85 | Chambers County Estimated | 127 | -15.9% |
| 85 | Colorado County Estimated | 127 | +139.6% |
| 87 | Frio County Estimated | 126 | -63.3% |
| 88 | Henderson County Estimated | 125 | +78.6% |
| 89 | Cherokee County Estimated | 123 | +132.1% |
| 89 | Starr County Estimated | 123 | +296.8% |
| 91 | Hill County Estimated | 121 | +105.1% |
| 91 | Wise County Estimated | 121 | +36% |
| 93 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 113 | -10.3% |
| 94 | Gonzales County Estimated | 112 | +72.3% |
| 95 | Burleson County Estimated | 110 | +64.2% |
| 95 | Lamb County Estimated | 110 | +41% |
| 97 | Castro County Estimated | 107 | +57.4% |
| 98 | Limestone County Estimated | 104 | +136.4% |
| 99 | Brewster County Estimated | 103 | +243.3% |
| 100 | Rusk County Estimated | 95 | +30.1% |
| 100 | Uvalde County Estimated | 95 | +11.8% |
| 102 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 91 | +68.5% |
| 103 | Andrews County Estimated | 88 | +238.5% |
| 104 | Terry County Estimated | 84 | +265.2% |
| 105 | Gray County Estimated | 83 | +72.9% |
| 105 | Wharton County Estimated | 83 | +31.7% |
| 107 | Erath County Estimated | 80 | +142.4% |
| 107 | Live Oak County Estimated | 80 | -2.4% |
| 107 | Upshur County Estimated | 80 | +166.7% |
| 110 | DeWitt County Estimated | 77 | +87.8% |
| 111 | Calhoun County Estimated | 76 | +24.6% |
| 111 | Zapata County Estimated | 76 | +68.9% |
| 113 | Jackson County Estimated | 75 | +108.3% |
| 114 | Scurry County Estimated | 68 | +183.3% |
| 115 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 67 | -20.2% |
| 116 | Grimes County Estimated | 66 | -8.3% |
| 117 | Lampasas County Estimated | 63 | +57.5% |
| 117 | San Jacinto County Estimated | 63 | +70.3% |
| 117 | Yoakum County Estimated | 63 | +3.3% |
| 120 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 61 | +15.1% |
| 121 | Fayette County Estimated | 59 | +181% |
| 122 | Brown County Estimated | 58 | -1.7% |
| 122 | Medina County Estimated | 58 | +100% |
| 124 | Atascosa County Estimated | 57 | +9.6% |
| 124 | Cochran County Estimated | 57 | +103.6% |
| 124 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 57 | +280% |
| 127 | Lamar County Estimated | 56 | -34.9% |
| 127 | Winkler County Estimated | 56 | -61.9% |
| 129 | Franklin County Estimated | 55 | +41% |
| 130 | Fannin County Estimated | 52 | +100% |
| 131 | Madison County Estimated | 51 | +218.8% |
| 132 | Bee County Estimated | 49 | +145% |
| 132 | Hardin County Estimated | 49 | +63.3% |
| 132 | Polk County Estimated | 49 | +172.2% |
| 132 | Shelby County Estimated | 49 | +5,000% |
| 136 | Garza County Estimated | 48 | -5.9% |
| 137 | Hockley County Estimated | 47 | +123.8% |
| 137 | Milam County Estimated | 47 | +67.9% |
| 139 | Aransas County Estimated | 46 | +666.7% |
| 140 | Freestone County Estimated | 42 | +5% |
| 140 | Hamilton County Estimated | 42 | +31.3% |
| 140 | Hansford County Estimated | 42 | +162.5% |
| 143 | Falls County Estimated | 41 | +51.9% |
| 144 | Cass County Estimated | 40 | +400% |
| 145 | Bandera County Estimated | 39 | +105.3% |
| 145 | Kinney County Estimated | 39 | +62.5% |
| 145 | Morris County Estimated | 39 | +105.3% |
| 148 | Martin County Estimated | 38 | +46.2% |
| 149 | Sherman County Estimated | 37 | +105.6% |
| 149 | Ward County Estimated | 37 | +85% |
| 151 | Camp County Estimated | 36 | -25% |
| 151 | Pecos County Estimated | 36 | +5.9% |
| 153 | Comanche County Estimated | 34 | +36% |
| 154 | Eastland County Estimated | 33 | -13.2% |
| 155 | Jack County Estimated | 32 | +113.3% |
| 155 | Lee County Estimated | 32 | +3,300% |
| 157 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 29 | +222.2% |
| 158 | Houston County Estimated | 28 | +21.7% |
| 159 | Leon County Estimated | 27 | +28.6% |
| 159 | Reagan County Estimated | 27 | +50% |
| 161 | San Saba County Estimated | 26 | -3.7% |
| 161 | Wheeler County Estimated | 26 | +52.9% |
| 161 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 26 | -10.3% |
| 164 | Presidio County Estimated | 25 | +400% |
| 164 | Rains County Estimated | 25 | +47.1% |
| 166 | Dawson County Estimated | 24 | +166.7% |
| 166 | Montague County Estimated | 24 | +200% |
| 168 | Blanco County Estimated | 22 | +2,300% |
| 168 | Somervell County Estimated | 22 | -8.3% |
| 170 | Robertson County Estimated | 21 | |
| 171 | Panola County Estimated | 20 | +1,900% |
| 172 | Hutchinson County Estimated | 19 | +850% |
| 173 | Brooks County Estimated | 18 | -18.2% |
| 173 | Hall County Estimated | 18 | +5.9% |
| 173 | Lavaca County Estimated | 18 | +38.5% |
| 173 | San Augustine County Estimated | 18 | +1,000% |
| 177 | Archer County Estimated | 17 | +750% |
| 177 | McCulloch County Estimated | 17 | +950% |
| 177 | Mitchell County Estimated | 17 | +142.9% |
| 177 | Willacy County Estimated | 17 | +325% |
| 181 | Red River County Estimated | 16 | -38.5% |
| 182 | Culberson County Estimated | 15 | +1,400% |
| 182 | Floyd County Estimated | 15 | +50% |
| 182 | Oldham County Estimated | 15 | +66.7% |
| 185 | Coleman County Estimated | 14 | +1,500% |
| 185 | Trinity County Estimated | 14 | +40% |
| 187 | Hardeman County Estimated | 13 | +8.3% |
| 188 | Nolan County Estimated | 12 | +300% |
| 189 | Bosque County Estimated | 11 | +37.5% |
| 189 | La Salle County Estimated | 11 | -77.6% |
| 191 | Jasper County Estimated | 10 | -56.5% |
| 192 | Crane County Estimated | 9 | +800% |
| 192 | Jones County Estimated | 9 | +200% |
| 194 | Upton County Estimated | 8 | |
| 195 | Crosby County Estimated | 7 | -46.2% |
| 195 | Hartley County Estimated | 7 | -30% |
| 195 | Karnes County Estimated | 7 | -92.5% |
| 195 | Lynn County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 199 | Delta County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 199 | Kenedy County Estimated | 6 | |
| 199 | Swisher County Estimated | 6 | -76.9% |
| 202 | Baylor County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 202 | Clay County Estimated | 5 | +25% |
| 202 | Dickens County Estimated | 5 | +400% |
| 202 | Haskell County Estimated | 5 | -64.3% |
| 202 | Refugio County Estimated | 5 | |
| 207 | Carson County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 207 | Mills County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 207 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 4 | 0% |
| 210 | Armstrong County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 210 | Hemphill County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 210 | Knox County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 210 | Marion County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 210 | Sutton County Estimated | 3 | -87% |
| 210 | Zavala County Estimated | 3 | -66.7% |
| 216 | Menard County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 217 | Briscoe County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 217 | Donley County Estimated | 1 | -66.7% |
| 217 | Fisher County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 217 | Goliad County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 217 | Real County Estimated | 1 | |
| 222 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Coke County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Duval County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 222 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Glasscock County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | McMullen County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Runnels County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 222 | Sabine County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 222 | Schleicher County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Shackelford County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 222 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | |
| 222 | Terrell County Estimated | 0 | |
| 243 | Childress County Estimated | -1 | +75% |
| 243 | Collingsworth County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 243 | Dimmit County Estimated | -1 | -120% |
| 243 | Edwards County Estimated | -1 | |
| 243 | Mason County Estimated | -1 | -200% |
| 243 | Sterling County Estimated | -1 | |
| 243 | Tyler County Estimated | -1 | -109.1% |
| 250 | Kimble County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year.
More on how it is measured
- United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas.
- Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents.
- Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year.
- United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2024,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2024
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2024.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 97,385 in 2024, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Stephens County, with -6 in 2024.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.