Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2021, at 13,920. Coryell County had the lowest, at -16. The median was 7 and the figure for Texas was 43,481. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2021
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2021 | Change on 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 13,920 | -29.3% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 6,681 | -15.7% |
| 3 | Tarrant County Estimated | 2,986 | -22% |
| 4 | Collin County Estimated | 2,863 | -16.9% |
| 5 | Travis County Estimated | 2,599 | -24.2% |
| 6 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 2,476 | -29.8% |
| 7 | Bexar County Estimated | 1,770 | -13.9% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 1,298 | -7% |
| 9 | Montgomery County Estimated | 759 | -0.7% |
| 10 | Williamson County Estimated | 754 | +8.2% |
| 11 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 590 | +179.6% |
| 12 | Brazos County Estimated | 384 | -52.6% |
| 13 | El Paso County Estimated | 378 | +30.8% |
| 14 | Lubbock County Estimated | 342 | +39.6% |
| 15 | Ector County Estimated | 331 | +78% |
| 16 | Webb County Estimated | 319 | -26.3% |
| 17 | Brazoria County Estimated | 315 | +16.2% |
| 18 | Cameron County Estimated | 290 | +2,316.7% |
| 19 | Midland County Estimated | 249 | -15.6% |
| 20 | Jefferson County Estimated | 224 | -17.9% |
| 21 | Nueces County Estimated | 219 | -33.2% |
| 22 | Potter County Estimated | 192 | -30.9% |
| 23 | Galveston County Estimated | 183 | -34.9% |
| 24 | Hays County Estimated | 169 | -36% |
| 25 | Taylor County Estimated | 140 | -4.1% |
| 26 | Frio County Estimated | 114 | -35.6% |
| 27 | McLennan County Estimated | 99 | -42.1% |
| 28 | Bell County Estimated | 94 | -72.1% |
| 29 | Walker County Estimated | 93 | -7.9% |
| 30 | Smith County Estimated | 88 | +15.8% |
| 31 | Rockwall County Estimated | 66 | -14.3% |
| 32 | Gregg County Estimated | 64 | -5.9% |
| 33 | Randall County Estimated | 63 | +34% |
| 34 | Ellis County Estimated | 61 | +35.6% |
| 35 | Hunt County Estimated | 59 | 0% |
| 36 | Wichita County Estimated | 57 | -58.7% |
| 37 | Moore County Estimated | 56 | +115.4% |
| 38 | Maverick County Estimated | 55 | -9.8% |
| 38 | Parker County Estimated | 55 | -21.4% |
| 40 | Kaufman County Estimated | 52 | +73.3% |
| 40 | Matagorda County Estimated | 52 | +85.7% |
| 42 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 51 | -13.6% |
| 43 | Karnes County Estimated | 49 | -44.9% |
| 44 | Bowie County Estimated | 47 | +20.5% |
| 45 | Val Verde County Estimated | 42 | +180% |
| 46 | Uvalde County Estimated | 41 | +925% |
| 47 | Dallam County Estimated | 40 | 0% |
| 48 | Johnson County Estimated | 38 | +375% |
| 49 | Howard County Estimated | 36 | -50.7% |
| 49 | Waller County Estimated | 36 | +38.5% |
| 51 | Gaines County Estimated | 35 | -57.3% |
| 52 | Andrews County Estimated | 34 | +61.9% |
| 53 | Anderson County Estimated | 33 | -17.5% |
| 53 | Gillespie County Estimated | 33 | +26.9% |
| 55 | Grayson County Estimated | 32 | -33.3% |
| 55 | Rusk County Estimated | 32 | +500% |
| 57 | Tom Green County Estimated | 31 | +106.7% |
| 58 | Bastrop County Estimated | 30 | +242.9% |
| 59 | Kendall County Estimated | 29 | +38.1% |
| 59 | Titus County Estimated | 29 | +141.7% |
| 61 | Colorado County Estimated | 28 | -46.2% |
| 61 | Garza County Estimated | 28 | -37.8% |
| 61 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 28 | +300% |
| 64 | Chambers County Estimated | 27 | +12.5% |
| 64 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 27 | +35% |
| 64 | Liberty County Estimated | 27 | +170% |
| 67 | Navarro County Estimated | 26 | +44.4% |
| 67 | Wharton County Estimated | 26 | +420% |
| 67 | Wood County Estimated | 26 | +136.4% |
| 70 | Hopkins County Estimated | 24 | +2,500% |
| 70 | Washington County Estimated | 24 | +580% |
| 72 | Hale County Estimated | 23 | +330% |
| 72 | Wise County Estimated | 23 | +43.8% |
| 74 | Harrison County Estimated | 22 | -53.2% |
| 74 | Yoakum County Estimated | 22 | -42.1% |
| 76 | Calhoun County Estimated | 21 | +31.3% |
| 76 | Madison County Estimated | 21 | -25% |
| 78 | Brewster County Estimated | 20 | +566.7% |
| 78 | Brooks County Estimated | 20 | -31% |
| 78 | Nolan County Estimated | 20 | -35.5% |
| 78 | Pecos County Estimated | 20 | +66.7% |
| 78 | San Patricio County Estimated | 20 | -58.3% |
| 83 | Caldwell County Estimated | 19 | -17.4% |
| 83 | Gray County Estimated | 19 | |
| 83 | La Salle County Estimated | 19 | +5.6% |
| 83 | Parmer County Estimated | 19 | +46.2% |
| 87 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 18 | +1,700% |
| 87 | Kerr County Estimated | 18 | -35.7% |
| 87 | Orange County Estimated | 18 | +80% |
| 87 | Wilson County Estimated | 18 | -21.7% |
| 91 | Erath County Estimated | 16 | +1,500% |
| 91 | Reeves County Estimated | 16 | -59% |
| 93 | Bailey County Estimated | 15 | +1,600% |
| 93 | Castro County Estimated | 15 | -34.8% |
| 93 | Hockley County Estimated | 15 | +7.1% |
| 96 | Burleson County Estimated | 14 | -41.7% |
| 96 | Hardin County Estimated | 14 | -39.1% |
| 96 | Swisher County Estimated | 14 | +450% |
| 96 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 14 | -63.2% |
| 96 | Winkler County Estimated | 14 | +7.7% |
| 101 | Cooke County Estimated | 13 | 0% |
| 101 | Kleberg County Estimated | 13 | -59.4% |
| 103 | Fayette County Estimated | 12 | -14.3% |
| 103 | Hill County Estimated | 12 | +200% |
| 105 | Eastland County Estimated | 11 | +466.7% |
| 105 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 11 | +147.8% |
| 105 | Terry County Estimated | 11 | +466.7% |
| 108 | Camp County Estimated | 10 | -54.5% |
| 108 | Comal County Estimated | 10 | -81.5% |
| 108 | Gonzales County Estimated | 10 | +600% |
| 108 | Lamar County Estimated | 10 | -16.7% |
| 108 | Presidio County Estimated | 10 | +150% |
| 108 | Scurry County Estimated | 10 | -33.3% |
| 114 | Medina County Estimated | 9 | 0% |
| 115 | Austin County Estimated | 8 | +33.3% |
| 115 | Bosque County Estimated | 8 | 0% |
| 115 | Concho County Estimated | 8 | -70.4% |
| 115 | Hamilton County Estimated | 8 | -11.1% |
| 115 | Jasper County Estimated | 8 | |
| 115 | Mitchell County Estimated | 8 | +100% |
| 115 | Morris County Estimated | 8 | +900% |
| 115 | Upshur County Estimated | 8 | |
| 123 | Fannin County Estimated | 7 | -82.5% |
| 123 | Hansford County Estimated | 7 | -58.8% |
| 123 | Jack County Estimated | 7 | +250% |
| 123 | Live Oak County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 123 | Polk County Estimated | 7 | -89.4% |
| 123 | Victoria County Estimated | 7 | -56.3% |
| 123 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 7 | +133.3% |
| 123 | Young County Estimated | 7 | -12.5% |
| 131 | Bandera County Estimated | 6 | -40% |
| 131 | Freestone County Estimated | 6 | -64.7% |
| 131 | Hall County Estimated | 6 | +500% |
| 131 | Sutton County Estimated | 6 | -50% |
| 135 | Glasscock County Estimated | 5 | -58.3% |
| 135 | Hardeman County Estimated | 5 | -37.5% |
| 135 | Kinney County Estimated | 5 | -58.3% |
| 135 | Lampasas County Estimated | 5 | +25% |
| 135 | Llano County Estimated | 5 | -28.6% |
| 135 | Montague County Estimated | 5 | +350% |
| 135 | Wheeler County Estimated | 5 | +600% |
| 135 | Willacy County Estimated | 5 | +25% |
| 135 | Zapata County Estimated | 5 | -58.3% |
| 144 | Archer County Estimated | 4 | +33.3% |
| 144 | Bee County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 144 | Clay County Estimated | 4 | -60% |
| 144 | Jones County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 144 | Lamb County Estimated | 4 | -20% |
| 144 | Lavaca County Estimated | 4 | -55.6% |
| 144 | Reagan County Estimated | 4 | -87.9% |
| 144 | Sherman County Estimated | 4 | -20% |
| 152 | Brown County Estimated | 3 | -82.4% |
| 152 | Cochran County Estimated | 3 | -75% |
| 152 | Duval County Estimated | 3 | 0% |
| 152 | Falls County Estimated | 3 | +400% |
| 152 | Franklin County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 152 | Grimes County Estimated | 3 | +137.5% |
| 152 | Jackson County Estimated | 3 | -50% |
| 152 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 3 | -93.2% |
| 152 | Knox County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 152 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 3 | -40% |
| 152 | Martin County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 152 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 3 | -40% |
| 152 | Rains County Estimated | 3 | -57.1% |
| 152 | Red River County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 152 | Ward County Estimated | 3 | -57.1% |
| 167 | Baylor County Estimated | 2 | |
| 167 | Cherokee County Estimated | 2 | -66.7% |
| 167 | Crosby County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 167 | Dawson County Estimated | 2 | -75% |
| 167 | Hartley County Estimated | 2 | -66.7% |
| 167 | Haskell County Estimated | 2 | -92% |
| 167 | Houston County Estimated | 2 | +300% |
| 167 | Leon County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 167 | Mills County Estimated | 2 | -50% |
| 167 | Panola County Estimated | 2 | +300% |
| 167 | Runnels County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 167 | Trinity County Estimated | 2 | -50% |
| 179 | Atascosa County Estimated | 1 | |
| 179 | Dickens County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 179 | Floyd County Estimated | 1 | |
| 179 | Hemphill County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 179 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 1 | -88.9% |
| 179 | Lynn County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 179 | Marion County Estimated | 1 | |
| 179 | Oldham County Estimated | 1 | |
| 179 | Sabine County Estimated | 1 | +125% |
| 179 | San Augustine County Estimated | 1 | -66.7% |
| 179 | Shelby County Estimated | 1 | +150% |
| 179 | Somervell County Estimated | 1 | +150% |
| 179 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 1 | |
| 179 | Upton County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 179 | Zavala County Estimated | 1 | -94.7% |
| 194 | Armstrong County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Blanco County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Briscoe County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Burnet County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Callahan County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Carson County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Coke County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Coleman County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Collingsworth County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Comanche County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Crane County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Culberson County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Delta County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Donley County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Edwards County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Fisher County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Goliad County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Hutchinson County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Kenedy County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Kimble County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Lee County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Limestone County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Mason County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | McCulloch County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | McMullen County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Menard County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Milam County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 194 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Real County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Refugio County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Schleicher County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Shackelford County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Stephens County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Sterling County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | |
| 194 | Terrell County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 194 | Tyler County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 240 | Cass County Estimated | -1 | -150% |
| 240 | Childress County Estimated | -1 | +75% |
| 240 | Crockett County Estimated | -1 | |
| 240 | DeWitt County Estimated | -1 | +80% |
| 240 | Dimmit County Estimated | -1 | +83.3% |
| 240 | Jeff Davis County Estimated | -1 | -133.3% |
| 240 | San Jacinto County Estimated | -1 | +91.7% |
| 240 | San Saba County Estimated | -1 | -120% |
| 248 | Angelina County Estimated | -2 | +77.8% |
| 248 | Aransas County Estimated | -2 | -300% |
| 248 | Henderson County Estimated | -2 | -118.2% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2021,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2021
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2021.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 13,920 in 2021, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Coryell County, with -16 in 2021.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.