Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2015, at 36,830. San Jacinto County had the lowest, at -12. The median was 17 and the figure for Texas was 117,265. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2015
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2015 | Change on 2014 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 36,830 | +7.7% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 15,605 | +13.2% |
| 3 | Tarrant County Estimated | 8,573 | +10.1% |
| 4 | Travis County Estimated | 7,200 | +12.3% |
| 5 | Collin County Estimated | 6,766 | +19.8% |
| 6 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 6,411 | +17% |
| 7 | Bexar County Estimated | 6,128 | +4.9% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 3,047 | +17.6% |
| 9 | El Paso County Estimated | 2,680 | +4.7% |
| 10 | Bell County Estimated | 1,912 | +22.4% |
| 11 | Montgomery County Estimated | 1,687 | +6.2% |
| 12 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,646 | -4.7% |
| 13 | Williamson County Estimated | 1,610 | +22.4% |
| 14 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 1,497 | +5.1% |
| 15 | Webb County Estimated | 916 | +19% |
| 16 | Nueces County Estimated | 814 | +8.1% |
| 17 | Jefferson County Estimated | 760 | +3% |
| 18 | Potter County Estimated | 680 | -2.4% |
| 19 | Galveston County Estimated | 661 | +17.4% |
| 20 | Cameron County Estimated | 595 | +6.8% |
| 21 | Midland County Estimated | 554 | +11.9% |
| 22 | Lubbock County Estimated | 511 | +13.1% |
| 23 | Brazoria County Estimated | 501 | -22.7% |
| 24 | Coryell County Estimated | 493 | +22.3% |
| 24 | Taylor County Estimated | 493 | +17.9% |
| 26 | Wichita County Estimated | 482 | +7.3% |
| 27 | Hays County Estimated | 439 | +70.2% |
| 28 | McLennan County Estimated | 415 | +4% |
| 29 | Ector County Estimated | 406 | +34.4% |
| 30 | Smith County Estimated | 306 | -15.9% |
| 31 | Frio County Estimated | 286 | +65.3% |
| 32 | Maverick County Estimated | 265 | +12.8% |
| 33 | Walker County Estimated | 221 | +3.8% |
| 34 | Grayson County Estimated | 204 | +6.8% |
| 35 | Comal County Estimated | 180 | +6.5% |
| 36 | Rockwall County Estimated | 162 | +24.6% |
| 37 | Polk County Estimated | 144 | +11.6% |
| 38 | Randall County Estimated | 141 | -34.4% |
| 39 | Gregg County Estimated | 131 | -29.2% |
| 40 | Ellis County Estimated | 128 | -7.2% |
| 41 | Hunt County Estimated | 127 | 0% |
| 42 | Gaines County Estimated | 123 | +13.9% |
| 43 | Howard County Estimated | 117 | +20.6% |
| 44 | Starr County Estimated | 108 | +28.6% |
| 44 | Val Verde County Estimated | 108 | -8.5% |
| 46 | Tom Green County Estimated | 105 | +72.1% |
| 47 | Karnes County Estimated | 103 | +25.6% |
| 48 | Kleberg County Estimated | 101 | -30.3% |
| 49 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 94 | -27.1% |
| 50 | Parker County Estimated | 87 | -18.7% |
| 50 | Waller County Estimated | 87 | +89.1% |
| 52 | Reeves County Estimated | 85 | -9.6% |
| 53 | Harrison County Estimated | 78 | +34.5% |
| 53 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 78 | +20% |
| 55 | Bowie County Estimated | 77 | -32.5% |
| 55 | Chambers County Estimated | 77 | -18.1% |
| 55 | Colorado County Estimated | 77 | +63.8% |
| 58 | San Patricio County Estimated | 76 | +8.6% |
| 59 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 73 | +15.9% |
| 59 | Victoria County Estimated | 73 | -20.7% |
| 61 | Yoakum County Estimated | 71 | +16.4% |
| 62 | Angelina County Estimated | 66 | +22.2% |
| 63 | Moore County Estimated | 65 | -53.6% |
| 64 | Kendall County Estimated | 64 | +42.2% |
| 65 | Cooke County Estimated | 63 | +18.9% |
| 65 | Kerr County Estimated | 63 | +43.2% |
| 67 | Dallam County Estimated | 62 | +77.1% |
| 68 | Fannin County Estimated | 61 | +45.2% |
| 69 | Garza County Estimated | 60 | +11.1% |
| 69 | Presidio County Estimated | 60 | -1.6% |
| 71 | Anderson County Estimated | 59 | +22.9% |
| 71 | Henderson County Estimated | 59 | -26.3% |
| 71 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 59 | +18% |
| 74 | Kaufman County Estimated | 54 | -39.3% |
| 75 | Brooks County Estimated | 51 | +41.7% |
| 76 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 47 | -56.1% |
| 76 | Zavala County Estimated | 47 | +27% |
| 78 | Cherokee County Estimated | 43 | +43.3% |
| 79 | Camp County Estimated | 42 | -12.5% |
| 80 | Burleson County Estimated | 40 | +25% |
| 80 | Calhoun County Estimated | 40 | +2.6% |
| 82 | Bailey County Estimated | 39 | +18.2% |
| 82 | Concho County Estimated | 39 | +14.7% |
| 84 | Hansford County Estimated | 38 | +8.6% |
| 84 | Haskell County Estimated | 38 | -36.7% |
| 84 | Titus County Estimated | 38 | -25.5% |
| 87 | Caldwell County Estimated | 37 | +32.1% |
| 87 | Wise County Estimated | 37 | +48% |
| 89 | Castro County Estimated | 36 | -10% |
| 89 | Reagan County Estimated | 36 | +16.1% |
| 89 | Wilson County Estimated | 36 | +50% |
| 92 | Winkler County Estimated | 35 | +250% |
| 93 | Andrews County Estimated | 32 | +14.3% |
| 93 | Parmer County Estimated | 32 | -31.9% |
| 95 | Liberty County Estimated | 30 | -55.9% |
| 96 | Washington County Estimated | 29 | 0% |
| 97 | Brown County Estimated | 27 | -30.8% |
| 97 | Dawson County Estimated | 27 | -6.9% |
| 99 | Johnson County Estimated | 26 | +360% |
| 100 | Austin County Estimated | 25 | +19% |
| 100 | Gray County Estimated | 25 | |
| 100 | Matagorda County Estimated | 25 | +933.3% |
| 100 | Navarro County Estimated | 25 | +525% |
| 104 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 24 | 0% |
| 104 | La Salle County Estimated | 24 | -14.3% |
| 104 | Orange County Estimated | 24 | +242.9% |
| 107 | Erath County Estimated | 23 | +283.3% |
| 107 | Kinney County Estimated | 23 | -37.8% |
| 107 | Nolan County Estimated | 23 | +43.8% |
| 107 | Panola County Estimated | 23 | +27.8% |
| 107 | Robertson County Estimated | 23 | 0% |
| 112 | Comanche County Estimated | 22 | +100% |
| 112 | Hartley County Estimated | 22 | +29.4% |
| 112 | Pecos County Estimated | 22 | +833.3% |
| 115 | Eastland County Estimated | 21 | +50% |
| 115 | Gillespie County Estimated | 21 | -48.8% |
| 115 | Scurry County Estimated | 21 | +162.5% |
| 118 | Freestone County Estimated | 19 | -9.5% |
| 118 | Jackson County Estimated | 19 | +72.7% |
| 118 | Young County Estimated | 19 | +5.6% |
| 121 | Live Oak County Estimated | 18 | +20% |
| 121 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 18 | +5.9% |
| 121 | Rusk County Estimated | 18 | -40% |
| 121 | Uvalde County Estimated | 18 | +325% |
| 125 | Cochran County Estimated | 17 | +21.4% |
| 125 | Madison County Estimated | 17 | 0% |
| 125 | Willacy County Estimated | 17 | 0% |
| 128 | Sutton County Estimated | 16 | +6.7% |
| 128 | Zapata County Estimated | 16 | +366.7% |
| 130 | Blanco County Estimated | 15 | -21.1% |
| 130 | Grimes County Estimated | 15 | 0% |
| 130 | Hale County Estimated | 15 | -44.4% |
| 130 | Houston County Estimated | 15 | -25% |
| 130 | Lavaca County Estimated | 15 | +150% |
| 130 | Medina County Estimated | 15 | -40% |
| 130 | Runnels County Estimated | 15 | -16.7% |
| 137 | Atascosa County Estimated | 14 | +40% |
| 137 | Hardeman County Estimated | 14 | +180% |
| 137 | Hood County Estimated | 14 | -75.9% |
| 137 | Mason County Estimated | 14 | -22.2% |
| 141 | Lampasas County Estimated | 13 | -40.9% |
| 141 | Limestone County Estimated | 13 | -56.7% |
| 143 | Clay County Estimated | 12 | +33.3% |
| 144 | Crane County Estimated | 11 | +10% |
| 144 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 11 | -50% |
| 144 | Glasscock County Estimated | 11 | +10% |
| 144 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 11 | -38.9% |
| 144 | San Saba County Estimated | 11 | +22.2% |
| 144 | Trinity County Estimated | 11 | 0% |
| 150 | Brewster County Estimated | 10 | |
| 150 | Cass County Estimated | 10 | -28.6% |
| 150 | Fayette County Estimated | 10 | -44.4% |
| 150 | Hamilton County Estimated | 10 | +11.1% |
| 150 | Hardin County Estimated | 10 | 0% |
| 150 | Kenedy County Estimated | 10 | -9.1% |
| 150 | Lamar County Estimated | 10 | -9.1% |
| 150 | Martin County Estimated | 10 | -37.5% |
| 150 | Milam County Estimated | 10 | 0% |
| 150 | Rains County Estimated | 10 | -9.1% |
| 150 | Terry County Estimated | 10 | -23.1% |
| 150 | Ward County Estimated | 10 | -9.1% |
| 150 | Wood County Estimated | 10 | +900% |
| 163 | Callahan County Estimated | 9 | +12.5% |
| 163 | Upshur County Estimated | 9 | -59.1% |
| 163 | Upton County Estimated | 9 | -18.2% |
| 166 | Duval County Estimated | 8 | +900% |
| 166 | Fisher County Estimated | 8 | -20% |
| 166 | Hill County Estimated | 8 | -75% |
| 169 | Refugio County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 169 | Sherman County Estimated | 7 | +250% |
| 169 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 7 | -50% |
| 172 | Carson County Estimated | 6 | +200% |
| 172 | Childress County Estimated | 6 | +100% |
| 172 | Coleman County Estimated | 6 | 0% |
| 172 | DeWitt County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 172 | Hemphill County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 172 | Jeff Davis County Estimated | 6 | +200% |
| 172 | Lamb County Estimated | 6 | -33.3% |
| 172 | McCulloch County Estimated | 6 | -14.3% |
| 180 | Crockett County Estimated | 5 | -44.4% |
| 180 | Hockley County Estimated | 5 | -28.6% |
| 180 | Hutchinson County Estimated | 5 | -72.2% |
| 180 | Knox County Estimated | 5 | 0% |
| 180 | Leon County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 180 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 5 | -16.7% |
| 180 | Wheeler County Estimated | 5 | 0% |
| 187 | Bandera County Estimated | 4 | -42.9% |
| 187 | Bosque County Estimated | 4 | 0% |
| 187 | Jack County Estimated | 4 | +233.3% |
| 190 | Bee County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 190 | McMullen County Estimated | 3 | -66.7% |
| 190 | Tyler County Estimated | 3 | -70% |
| 190 | Wharton County Estimated | 3 | -62.5% |
| 194 | Donley County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 194 | Floyd County Estimated | 2 | -71.4% |
| 194 | Lynn County Estimated | 2 | |
| 194 | Menard County Estimated | 2 | -33.3% |
| 194 | Real County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 194 | San Augustine County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 200 | Briscoe County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 200 | Collingsworth County Estimated | 1 | -83.3% |
| 200 | Crosby County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 200 | Hall County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 200 | Marion County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 200 | Mills County Estimated | 1 | -75% |
| 200 | Montague County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 200 | Morris County Estimated | 1 | |
| 200 | Terrell County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 209 | Archer County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Armstrong County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Bastrop County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Baylor County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Coke County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Culberson County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Delta County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Dickens County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Jones County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Kimble County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Mitchell County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Oldham County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Schleicher County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 209 | Shackelford County Estimated | 0 | |
| 209 | Sterling County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 209 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 236 | Edwards County Estimated | -1 | -200% |
| 236 | Goliad County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 236 | Somervell County Estimated | -1 | +50% |
| 236 | Swisher County Estimated | -1 | -133.3% |
| 240 | Falls County Estimated | -2 | -116.7% |
| 240 | Franklin County Estimated | -2 | +60% |
| 240 | Sabine County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 243 | Dimmit County Estimated | -4 | -150% |
| 243 | Hopkins County Estimated | -4 | -500% |
| 243 | Jasper County Estimated | -4 | +20% |
| 243 | Llano County Estimated | -4 | -180% |
| 243 | Red River County Estimated | -4 | -100% |
| 243 | Stephens County Estimated | -4 | +33.3% |
| 249 | Lee County Estimated | -5 | -25% |
| 250 | Gonzales County Estimated | -6 | +33.3% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2015,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2015
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2015.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 36,830 in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
San Jacinto County, with -12 in 2015.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.