Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2023, at 74,467. Crockett County had the lowest, at -6. The median was 32 and the figure for Texas was 251,690. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2023 | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 74,467 | +14.7% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 39,629 | +40.5% |
| 3 | Travis County Estimated | 18,217 | +18.5% |
| 4 | Tarrant County Estimated | 17,060 | +42.6% |
| 5 | Collin County Estimated | 16,122 | +35.5% |
| 6 | Bexar County Estimated | 15,103 | +42.5% |
| 7 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 9,838 | +10.4% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 7,794 | +29.1% |
| 9 | Montgomery County Estimated | 5,338 | +30.4% |
| 10 | Williamson County Estimated | 5,250 | +25.2% |
| 11 | El Paso County Estimated | 4,159 | +66.4% |
| 12 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 3,570 | +45.4% |
| 13 | Webb County Estimated | 2,847 | +77.4% |
| 14 | Cameron County Estimated | 2,257 | +32.5% |
| 15 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,656 | +41.9% |
| 16 | Ector County Estimated | 1,564 | -10.8% |
| 17 | Midland County Estimated | 1,436 | +9.2% |
| 18 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,435 | +25.7% |
| 19 | Lubbock County Estimated | 1,231 | +20.8% |
| 20 | Bell County Estimated | 1,202 | +53.3% |
| 21 | Hays County Estimated | 1,156 | +40.5% |
| 22 | Jefferson County Estimated | 1,050 | -7.9% |
| 23 | Galveston County Estimated | 992 | +15.1% |
| 24 | Nueces County Estimated | 913 | +14.8% |
| 25 | Potter County Estimated | 750 | +33.2% |
| 26 | Taylor County Estimated | 725 | +24.1% |
| 27 | McLennan County Estimated | 553 | +25.4% |
| 28 | Smith County Estimated | 530 | +59.6% |
| 29 | Johnson County Estimated | 524 | +26% |
| 30 | Kaufman County Estimated | 514 | +83.6% |
| 31 | Bastrop County Estimated | 453 | +68.4% |
| 32 | Ellis County Estimated | 449 | +87.1% |
| 33 | Liberty County Estimated | 373 | +29.5% |
| 34 | Frio County Estimated | 343 | +69.8% |
| 35 | Moore County Estimated | 334 | +33.1% |
| 36 | San Patricio County Estimated | 333 | +52.8% |
| 37 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 322 | +42.5% |
| 38 | Grayson County Estimated | 318 | +43.9% |
| 39 | Parker County Estimated | 314 | +78.4% |
| 40 | Hunt County Estimated | 291 | +54% |
| 41 | Waller County Estimated | 290 | -10.5% |
| 42 | Wichita County Estimated | 283 | +17.4% |
| 43 | Rockwall County Estimated | 276 | +32.7% |
| 44 | Gregg County Estimated | 271 | +46.5% |
| 45 | Caldwell County Estimated | 262 | +41.6% |
| 46 | Randall County Estimated | 252 | +15.6% |
| 47 | Maverick County Estimated | 222 | +22% |
| 48 | Walker County Estimated | 209 | -14.3% |
| 49 | Coryell County Estimated | 194 | +48.1% |
| 50 | Burnet County Estimated | 189 | +107.7% |
| 51 | Tom Green County Estimated | 183 | +27.1% |
| 52 | Dallam County Estimated | 175 | +36.7% |
| 53 | Howard County Estimated | 165 | +77.4% |
| 54 | Angelina County Estimated | 160 | +627.3% |
| 55 | Matagorda County Estimated | 157 | +0.6% |
| 56 | Concho County Estimated | 154 | +258.1% |
| 57 | Anderson County Estimated | 153 | +35.4% |
| 57 | Comal County Estimated | 153 | +40.4% |
| 59 | Chambers County Estimated | 151 | +18.9% |
| 60 | Winkler County Estimated | 147 | +34.9% |
| 61 | Val Verde County Estimated | 144 | +41.2% |
| 62 | Bowie County Estimated | 142 | +47.9% |
| 63 | Hood County Estimated | 136 | +231.7% |
| 64 | Wilson County Estimated | 130 | +80.6% |
| 65 | Kendall County Estimated | 127 | -17.5% |
| 66 | Bailey County Estimated | 126 | +28.6% |
| 66 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 126 | -0.8% |
| 68 | Titus County Estimated | 121 | +70.4% |
| 69 | Orange County Estimated | 120 | +12.1% |
| 70 | Reeves County Estimated | 111 | +46.1% |
| 71 | Austin County Estimated | 107 | +67.2% |
| 72 | Navarro County Estimated | 105 | +118.8% |
| 73 | Gillespie County Estimated | 104 | -24.6% |
| 74 | Kleberg County Estimated | 98 | +44.1% |
| 75 | Washington County Estimated | 96 | +128.6% |
| 76 | Harrison County Estimated | 95 | +111.1% |
| 77 | Karnes County Estimated | 93 | -19.8% |
| 78 | Hopkins County Estimated | 92 | +39.4% |
| 79 | Victoria County Estimated | 91 | 0% |
| 80 | Hale County Estimated | 89 | +20.3% |
| 80 | Wise County Estimated | 89 | +111.9% |
| 80 | Wood County Estimated | 89 | -11.9% |
| 83 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 87 | +13% |
| 84 | Lamar County Estimated | 86 | +22.9% |
| 85 | Uvalde County Estimated | 85 | +11.8% |
| 86 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 84 | -23.6% |
| 87 | Kerr County Estimated | 82 | +28.1% |
| 87 | Live Oak County Estimated | 82 | +78.3% |
| 89 | Lamb County Estimated | 78 | +116.7% |
| 90 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 76 | +22.6% |
| 91 | Rusk County Estimated | 73 | +28.1% |
| 92 | Gaines County Estimated | 72 | +20% |
| 92 | Grimes County Estimated | 72 | +200% |
| 92 | Parmer County Estimated | 72 | +38.5% |
| 92 | Young County Estimated | 72 | +350% |
| 96 | Henderson County Estimated | 70 | +159.3% |
| 97 | Castro County Estimated | 68 | +161.5% |
| 98 | Burleson County Estimated | 67 | -18.3% |
| 98 | Llano County Estimated | 67 | -13% |
| 100 | Cooke County Estimated | 66 | +120% |
| 101 | Gonzales County Estimated | 65 | +140.7% |
| 102 | Wharton County Estimated | 63 | -20.3% |
| 103 | Calhoun County Estimated | 61 | +41.9% |
| 103 | Yoakum County Estimated | 61 | -16.4% |
| 105 | Brown County Estimated | 59 | +55.3% |
| 105 | Hill County Estimated | 59 | +20.4% |
| 107 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 54 | +170% |
| 108 | Cherokee County Estimated | 53 | +140.9% |
| 108 | Colorado County Estimated | 53 | -14.5% |
| 108 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 53 | +178.9% |
| 111 | Atascosa County Estimated | 52 | +677.8% |
| 112 | Garza County Estimated | 51 | -8.9% |
| 113 | La Salle County Estimated | 49 | +36.1% |
| 114 | Camp County Estimated | 48 | +77.8% |
| 114 | Gray County Estimated | 48 | +14.3% |
| 116 | Zapata County Estimated | 45 | +80% |
| 117 | Limestone County Estimated | 44 | -70.7% |
| 118 | DeWitt County Estimated | 41 | +78.3% |
| 119 | Freestone County Estimated | 40 | +166.7% |
| 119 | Lampasas County Estimated | 40 | +81.8% |
| 121 | Franklin County Estimated | 39 | +39.3% |
| 122 | Eastland County Estimated | 38 | +46.2% |
| 123 | San Jacinto County Estimated | 37 | +19.4% |
| 124 | Jackson County Estimated | 36 | +140% |
| 125 | Pecos County Estimated | 34 | -12.8% |
| 126 | Erath County Estimated | 33 | +43.5% |
| 127 | Hamilton County Estimated | 32 | +52.4% |
| 128 | Starr County Estimated | 31 | +29.2% |
| 129 | Brewster County Estimated | 30 | -26.8% |
| 129 | Hardin County Estimated | 30 | +7.1% |
| 129 | Upshur County Estimated | 30 | +11.1% |
| 132 | Medina County Estimated | 29 | +52.6% |
| 132 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 29 | +163.6% |
| 134 | Cochran County Estimated | 28 | +64.7% |
| 134 | Milam County Estimated | 28 | +115.4% |
| 136 | Falls County Estimated | 27 | +22.7% |
| 136 | San Saba County Estimated | 27 | +575% |
| 138 | Andrews County Estimated | 26 | -63.9% |
| 138 | Fannin County Estimated | 26 | +73.3% |
| 138 | Martin County Estimated | 26 | -51.9% |
| 138 | Red River County Estimated | 26 | +52.9% |
| 138 | Swisher County Estimated | 26 | -33.3% |
| 143 | Comanche County Estimated | 25 | +66.7% |
| 144 | Kinney County Estimated | 24 | +71.4% |
| 144 | Scurry County Estimated | 24 | -42.9% |
| 144 | Somervell County Estimated | 24 | -17.2% |
| 147 | Houston County Estimated | 23 | +27.8% |
| 147 | Jasper County Estimated | 23 | -28.1% |
| 147 | Sutton County Estimated | 23 | +4.5% |
| 147 | Terry County Estimated | 23 | -39.5% |
| 151 | Brooks County Estimated | 22 | -42.1% |
| 152 | Fayette County Estimated | 21 | -44.7% |
| 152 | Hockley County Estimated | 21 | -34.4% |
| 152 | Leon County Estimated | 21 | +10.5% |
| 155 | Bee County Estimated | 20 | +66.7% |
| 155 | Ward County Estimated | 20 | +400% |
| 157 | Bandera County Estimated | 19 | -45.7% |
| 157 | Morris County Estimated | 19 | -17.4% |
| 159 | Polk County Estimated | 18 | +157.1% |
| 159 | Reagan County Estimated | 18 | +12.5% |
| 159 | Sherman County Estimated | 18 | +500% |
| 162 | Hall County Estimated | 17 | -10.5% |
| 162 | Rains County Estimated | 17 | +142.9% |
| 162 | Wheeler County Estimated | 17 | +30.8% |
| 165 | Hansford County Estimated | 16 | +633.3% |
| 165 | Madison County Estimated | 16 | -76.1% |
| 167 | Jack County Estimated | 15 | +66.7% |
| 167 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 15 | -42.3% |
| 169 | Haskell County Estimated | 14 | -6.7% |
| 170 | Crosby County Estimated | 13 | +8.3% |
| 170 | Lavaca County Estimated | 13 | +116.7% |
| 172 | Hardeman County Estimated | 12 | +33.3% |
| 173 | Tyler County Estimated | 11 | -15.4% |
| 174 | Floyd County Estimated | 10 | +600% |
| 174 | Hartley County Estimated | 10 | +66.7% |
| 174 | Trinity County Estimated | 10 | 0% |
| 177 | Dawson County Estimated | 9 | -18.2% |
| 177 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 9 | -30.8% |
| 177 | Oldham County Estimated | 9 | -30.8% |
| 177 | Zavala County Estimated | 9 | +125% |
| 181 | Bosque County Estimated | 8 | -55.6% |
| 181 | Cass County Estimated | 8 | +366.7% |
| 181 | Montague County Estimated | 8 | -11.1% |
| 184 | Lynn County Estimated | 7 | +250% |
| 184 | Mitchell County Estimated | 7 | -36.4% |
| 186 | Aransas County Estimated | 6 | +700% |
| 187 | Callahan County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 187 | Dimmit County Estimated | 5 | |
| 187 | Presidio County Estimated | 5 | -90.2% |
| 190 | Clay County Estimated | 4 | -60% |
| 190 | Delta County Estimated | 4 | +300% |
| 190 | Runnels County Estimated | 4 | -20% |
| 190 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 190 | Willacy County Estimated | 4 | -63.6% |
| 195 | Baylor County Estimated | 3 | -78.6% |
| 195 | Donley County Estimated | 3 | -40% |
| 195 | Jones County Estimated | 3 | -50% |
| 195 | Nolan County Estimated | 3 | -88.5% |
| 199 | Archer County Estimated | 2 | -81.8% |
| 199 | Armstrong County Estimated | 2 | |
| 199 | Carson County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 199 | Hutchinson County Estimated | 2 | +150% |
| 199 | Marion County Estimated | 2 | -33.3% |
| 199 | Mills County Estimated | 2 | -60% |
| 205 | Briscoe County Estimated | 1 | |
| 205 | Crane County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 205 | Culberson County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 205 | Dickens County Estimated | 1 | -66.7% |
| 205 | Duval County Estimated | 1 | |
| 205 | Fisher County Estimated | 1 | -75% |
| 205 | Hemphill County Estimated | 1 | |
| 205 | Knox County Estimated | 1 | -66.7% |
| 205 | Mason County Estimated | 1 | -83.3% |
| 205 | Menard County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 205 | Panola County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 205 | Sabine County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 205 | Shackelford County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 218 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Coke County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Edwards County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Glasscock County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 218 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Kenedy County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | McMullen County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 218 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Real County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 218 | Refugio County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 218 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Robertson County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 218 | Schleicher County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Sterling County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Terrell County Estimated | 0 | |
| 218 | Upton County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 242 | Blanco County Estimated | -1 | -150% |
| 242 | Coleman County Estimated | -1 | +50% |
| 242 | Collingsworth County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 242 | Goliad County Estimated | -1 | +50% |
| 242 | Lee County Estimated | -1 | -125% |
| 242 | Shelby County Estimated | -1 | -200% |
| 248 | Kimble County Estimated | -2 | -133.3% |
| 248 | McCulloch County Estimated | -2 | -100% |
| 248 | San Augustine County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2023,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2023
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2023.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 74,467 in 2023, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Crockett County, with -6 in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.