Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2019, at 24,967. Cameron County had the lowest, at -59. The median was 7 and the figure for Texas was 66,791. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2019
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2019 | Change on 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 24,967 | -2.4% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 9,889 | -0.6% |
| 3 | Tarrant County Estimated | 4,597 | -14.9% |
| 4 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 4,569 | -0.7% |
| 5 | Collin County Estimated | 4,398 | -2.2% |
| 6 | Travis County Estimated | 4,331 | -0.7% |
| 7 | Bexar County Estimated | 2,176 | -24.1% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 1,726 | -8.1% |
| 9 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,022 | +2.4% |
| 10 | Montgomery County Estimated | 930 | -9.6% |
| 11 | Williamson County Estimated | 827 | -11.3% |
| 12 | Webb County Estimated | 527 | +48.9% |
| 13 | Nueces County Estimated | 389 | +3.7% |
| 14 | Midland County Estimated | 358 | +7.2% |
| 15 | Galveston County Estimated | 344 | -5% |
| 16 | Potter County Estimated | 334 | +0.3% |
| 17 | Lubbock County Estimated | 311 | -8.8% |
| 18 | Hays County Estimated | 308 | -12.5% |
| 19 | Jefferson County Estimated | 271 | -40% |
| 20 | Brazoria County Estimated | 253 | -47.3% |
| 21 | Ector County Estimated | 232 | +5% |
| 22 | Frio County Estimated | 227 | +6.6% |
| 23 | McLennan County Estimated | 196 | -3% |
| 24 | Wichita County Estimated | 173 | +50.4% |
| 25 | Taylor County Estimated | 171 | +21.3% |
| 26 | Bell County Estimated | 160 | -70.9% |
| 27 | Walker County Estimated | 135 | -0.7% |
| 28 | Karnes County Estimated | 113 | +6.6% |
| 29 | El Paso County Estimated | 100 | +184.7% |
| 30 | Polk County Estimated | 93 | +13.4% |
| 31 | Smith County Estimated | 92 | -10.7% |
| 32 | Gaines County Estimated | 90 | +23.3% |
| 33 | Howard County Estimated | 86 | +28.4% |
| 34 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 83 | +134.6% |
| 35 | Parker County Estimated | 82 | +5.1% |
| 36 | Rockwall County Estimated | 77 | -19.8% |
| 37 | Gregg County Estimated | 74 | +21.3% |
| 38 | Colorado County Estimated | 67 | +1.5% |
| 38 | Hunt County Estimated | 67 | +4.7% |
| 38 | Randall County Estimated | 67 | +11.7% |
| 41 | Comal County Estimated | 65 | +54.8% |
| 42 | Maverick County Estimated | 61 | +15.1% |
| 43 | Ellis County Estimated | 60 | +71.4% |
| 43 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 60 | -1.6% |
| 45 | Dallam County Estimated | 56 | +30.2% |
| 45 | Harrison County Estimated | 56 | +7.7% |
| 47 | San Patricio County Estimated | 55 | +19.6% |
| 48 | Reeves County Estimated | 54 | +20% |
| 49 | Bowie County Estimated | 52 | +4% |
| 50 | Anderson County Estimated | 50 | +4.2% |
| 50 | Yoakum County Estimated | 50 | +35.1% |
| 52 | Grayson County Estimated | 49 | +4.3% |
| 53 | Kleberg County Estimated | 48 | +26.3% |
| 53 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 48 | +29.7% |
| 55 | Fannin County Estimated | 45 | -4.3% |
| 55 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 45 | 0% |
| 57 | Garza County Estimated | 42 | +23.5% |
| 58 | Madison County Estimated | 41 | +20.6% |
| 59 | Reagan County Estimated | 40 | +2.6% |
| 60 | Brooks County Estimated | 39 | +21.9% |
| 61 | Nolan County Estimated | 38 | +31% |
| 62 | Kerr County Estimated | 35 | +12.9% |
| 63 | Coryell County Estimated | 33 | +170.2% |
| 63 | Haskell County Estimated | 33 | +6.5% |
| 63 | Matagorda County Estimated | 33 | +83.3% |
| 63 | Waller County Estimated | 33 | -15.4% |
| 67 | Concho County Estimated | 32 | +18.5% |
| 68 | Gillespie County Estimated | 31 | +82.4% |
| 69 | Chambers County Estimated | 30 | +15.4% |
| 70 | Camp County Estimated | 29 | +26.1% |
| 71 | Hardin County Estimated | 28 | +27.3% |
| 71 | Moore County Estimated | 28 | +47.4% |
| 73 | Andrews County Estimated | 27 | +80% |
| 73 | Burleson County Estimated | 27 | -6.9% |
| 73 | Winkler County Estimated | 27 | +58.8% |
| 76 | Brown County Estimated | 24 | +33.3% |
| 76 | Hansford County Estimated | 24 | +33.3% |
| 76 | La Salle County Estimated | 24 | +9.1% |
| 76 | Victoria County Estimated | 24 | +26.3% |
| 80 | Wilson County Estimated | 23 | +21.1% |
| 81 | Kaufman County Estimated | 22 | -15.4% |
| 82 | Caldwell County Estimated | 20 | -28.6% |
| 82 | Freestone County Estimated | 20 | +25% |
| 82 | Navarro County Estimated | 20 | +42.9% |
| 82 | Robertson County Estimated | 20 | +5.3% |
| 86 | Kinney County Estimated | 18 | +28.6% |
| 87 | Cochran County Estimated | 16 | +23.1% |
| 87 | Kendall County Estimated | 16 | -73.3% |
| 89 | Castro County Estimated | 15 | 0% |
| 89 | Liberty County Estimated | 15 | +150% |
| 89 | Val Verde County Estimated | 15 | +150% |
| 92 | Wood County Estimated | 14 | +27.3% |
| 93 | Fayette County Estimated | 13 | +8.3% |
| 93 | Parmer County Estimated | 13 | +85.7% |
| 95 | Clay County Estimated | 12 | +20% |
| 95 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 12 | 0% |
| 95 | Scurry County Estimated | 12 | -25% |
| 95 | Sutton County Estimated | 12 | 0% |
| 99 | Austin County Estimated | 11 | |
| 99 | Glasscock County Estimated | 11 | 0% |
| 99 | Johnson County Estimated | 11 | -71.8% |
| 99 | Pecos County Estimated | 11 | -15.4% |
| 103 | Bandera County Estimated | 10 | +42.9% |
| 103 | Bosque County Estimated | 10 | +25% |
| 103 | Cooke County Estimated | 10 | +11.1% |
| 103 | Hamilton County Estimated | 10 | +42.9% |
| 103 | Hardeman County Estimated | 10 | +25% |
| 103 | Hockley County Estimated | 10 | +42.9% |
| 103 | Presidio County Estimated | 10 | +233.3% |
| 103 | Tom Green County Estimated | 10 | +133.3% |
| 103 | Wharton County Estimated | 10 | +242.9% |
| 103 | Young County Estimated | 10 | +42.9% |
| 113 | Comanche County Estimated | 9 | -10% |
| 113 | Dawson County Estimated | 9 | +80% |
| 113 | Henderson County Estimated | 9 | |
| 113 | Jackson County Estimated | 9 | +200% |
| 113 | Lamar County Estimated | 9 | +50% |
| 113 | Wise County Estimated | 9 | -62.5% |
| 119 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 8 | +14.3% |
| 119 | Trinity County Estimated | 8 | 0% |
| 121 | Calhoun County Estimated | 7 | -82.9% |
| 121 | Houston County Estimated | 7 | +75% |
| 121 | Live Oak County Estimated | 7 | +40% |
| 121 | Llano County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 121 | Mason County Estimated | 7 | +75% |
| 121 | Medina County Estimated | 7 | +16.7% |
| 121 | Rains County Estimated | 7 | +40% |
| 128 | Hemphill County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 128 | Lavaca County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 128 | Mitchell County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 128 | Orange County Estimated | 6 | -25% |
| 128 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 6 | 0% |
| 128 | Sherman County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 128 | Upton County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 135 | Crane County Estimated | 5 | +25% |
| 135 | Duval County Estimated | 5 | |
| 135 | Fisher County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 135 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 5 | -61.5% |
| 135 | Knox County Estimated | 5 | 0% |
| 135 | Lamb County Estimated | 5 | +400% |
| 135 | Ward County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 135 | Zapata County Estimated | 5 | +171.4% |
| 143 | Cass County Estimated | 4 | 0% |
| 143 | Cherokee County Estimated | 4 | +128.6% |
| 143 | Hartley County Estimated | 4 | 0% |
| 143 | Jeff Davis County Estimated | 4 | 0% |
| 143 | Jones County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 143 | Lampasas County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 143 | Runnels County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 150 | Coleman County Estimated | 3 | 0% |
| 150 | Crosby County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 150 | Franklin County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 150 | Limestone County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 150 | Menard County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 150 | Mills County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 150 | San Saba County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 157 | Archer County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 157 | Callahan County Estimated | 2 | -33.3% |
| 157 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 2 | +133.3% |
| 157 | Jack County Estimated | 2 | |
| 157 | Marion County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 157 | Martin County Estimated | 2 | +300% |
| 157 | Montague County Estimated | 2 | +200% |
| 157 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 2 | +150% |
| 157 | Refugio County Estimated | 2 | -60% |
| 157 | San Augustine County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 167 | Bee County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 167 | Blanco County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 167 | Brewster County Estimated | 1 | -83.3% |
| 167 | Briscoe County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 167 | Donley County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 167 | Jasper County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 167 | Kenedy County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 167 | Leon County Estimated | 1 | |
| 167 | Lynn County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 167 | McCulloch County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 167 | Oldham County Estimated | 1 | |
| 167 | Schleicher County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 167 | Terrell County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 180 | Armstrong County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Baylor County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Carson County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 180 | Collingsworth County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Crockett County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Culberson County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Delta County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Dickens County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 180 | Floyd County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Goliad County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 180 | Hall County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 180 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Kimble County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | McMullen County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Real County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Shackelford County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Sterling County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 0 | |
| 180 | Zavala County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 210 | Coke County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 210 | Red River County Estimated | -1 | |
| 210 | Stephens County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 210 | Wheeler County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 214 | Atascosa County Estimated | -2 | -300% |
| 214 | Edwards County Estimated | -2 | -100% |
| 214 | Erath County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 214 | Falls County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 214 | Hill County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 214 | Hood County Estimated | -2 | |
| 214 | Hutchinson County Estimated | -2 | |
| 214 | Morris County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 214 | Panola County Estimated | -2 | +33.3% |
| 214 | Willacy County Estimated | -2 | +80% |
| 224 | Aransas County Estimated | -3 | +57.1% |
| 224 | Somervell County Estimated | -3 | 0% |
| 226 | Childress County Estimated | -4 | +33.3% |
| 226 | Eastland County Estimated | -4 | 0% |
| 226 | Gray County Estimated | -4 | 0% |
| 226 | Lee County Estimated | -4 | +33.3% |
| 226 | Terry County Estimated | -4 | +50% |
| 226 | Tyler County Estimated | -4 | 0% |
| 232 | Bailey County Estimated | -5 | +28.6% |
| 232 | Grimes County Estimated | -5 | 0% |
| 232 | Hopkins County Estimated | -5 | +37.5% |
| 232 | Uvalde County Estimated | -5 | -111.4% |
| 236 | Dimmit County Estimated | -6 | 0% |
| 236 | Milam County Estimated | -6 | +14.3% |
| 236 | Sabine County Estimated | -6 | 0% |
| 236 | Upshur County Estimated | -6 | -50% |
| 240 | Angelina County Estimated | -7 | -75% |
| 241 | Gonzales County Estimated | -8 | +38.5% |
| 241 | Rusk County Estimated | -8 | +42.9% |
| 243 | Washington County Estimated | -9 | +18.2% |
| 244 | DeWitt County Estimated | -11 | -450% |
| 244 | Swisher County Estimated | -11 | -57.1% |
| 246 | Shelby County Estimated | -15 | -150% |
| 247 | San Jacinto County Estimated | -17 | 0% |
| 248 | Hale County Estimated | -20 | +13% |
| 249 | Titus County Estimated | -23 | -128.8% |
| 250 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | -28 | -7.7% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2019,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2019
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2019.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 24,967 in 2019, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Cameron County, with -59 in 2019.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.