Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2022, at 64,947. Atascosa County had the lowest, at -9. The median was 27 and the figure for Texas was 198,371. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2022 | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 64,947 | +366.6% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 28,196 | +322% |
| 3 | Travis County Estimated | 15,376 | +491.6% |
| 4 | Tarrant County Estimated | 11,963 | +300.6% |
| 5 | Collin County Estimated | 11,900 | +315.6% |
| 6 | Bexar County Estimated | 10,595 | +498.6% |
| 7 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 8,911 | +259.9% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 6,038 | +365.2% |
| 9 | Williamson County Estimated | 4,194 | +456.2% |
| 10 | Montgomery County Estimated | 4,095 | +439.5% |
| 11 | El Paso County Estimated | 2,500 | +561.4% |
| 12 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 2,456 | +316.3% |
| 13 | Ector County Estimated | 1,754 | +429.9% |
| 14 | Cameron County Estimated | 1,703 | +487.2% |
| 15 | Webb County Estimated | 1,605 | +403.1% |
| 16 | Midland County Estimated | 1,315 | +428.1% |
| 17 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,167 | +203.9% |
| 18 | Brazoria County Estimated | 1,142 | +262.5% |
| 19 | Jefferson County Estimated | 1,140 | +408.9% |
| 20 | Lubbock County Estimated | 1,019 | +198% |
| 21 | Galveston County Estimated | 862 | +371% |
| 22 | Hays County Estimated | 823 | +387% |
| 23 | Nueces County Estimated | 795 | +263% |
| 24 | Bell County Estimated | 784 | +734% |
| 25 | Taylor County Estimated | 584 | +317.1% |
| 26 | Potter County Estimated | 563 | +193.2% |
| 27 | McLennan County Estimated | 441 | +345.5% |
| 28 | Johnson County Estimated | 416 | +994.7% |
| 29 | Smith County Estimated | 332 | +277.3% |
| 30 | Waller County Estimated | 324 | +800% |
| 31 | Liberty County Estimated | 288 | +966.7% |
| 32 | Kaufman County Estimated | 280 | +438.5% |
| 33 | Bastrop County Estimated | 269 | +796.7% |
| 34 | Moore County Estimated | 251 | +348.2% |
| 35 | Walker County Estimated | 244 | +162.4% |
| 36 | Wichita County Estimated | 241 | +322.8% |
| 37 | Ellis County Estimated | 240 | +293.4% |
| 38 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 226 | +737% |
| 39 | Grayson County Estimated | 221 | +590.6% |
| 40 | Randall County Estimated | 218 | +246% |
| 40 | San Patricio County Estimated | 218 | +990% |
| 42 | Rockwall County Estimated | 208 | +215.2% |
| 43 | Frio County Estimated | 202 | +77.2% |
| 44 | Hunt County Estimated | 189 | +220.3% |
| 45 | Caldwell County Estimated | 185 | +873.7% |
| 45 | Gregg County Estimated | 185 | +189.1% |
| 47 | Maverick County Estimated | 182 | +230.9% |
| 48 | Parker County Estimated | 176 | +220% |
| 49 | Matagorda County Estimated | 156 | +200% |
| 50 | Kendall County Estimated | 154 | +431% |
| 51 | Limestone County Estimated | 150 | |
| 52 | Tom Green County Estimated | 144 | +364.5% |
| 53 | Gillespie County Estimated | 138 | +318.2% |
| 54 | Coryell County Estimated | 131 | +918.8% |
| 55 | Dallam County Estimated | 128 | +220% |
| 56 | Chambers County Estimated | 127 | +370.4% |
| 56 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 127 | +353.6% |
| 58 | Karnes County Estimated | 116 | +136.7% |
| 59 | Anderson County Estimated | 113 | +242.4% |
| 60 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 110 | +115.7% |
| 61 | Comal County Estimated | 109 | +990% |
| 61 | Winkler County Estimated | 109 | +678.6% |
| 63 | Orange County Estimated | 107 | +494.4% |
| 64 | Val Verde County Estimated | 102 | +142.9% |
| 65 | Wood County Estimated | 101 | +288.5% |
| 66 | Bailey County Estimated | 98 | +553.3% |
| 67 | Bowie County Estimated | 96 | +104.3% |
| 68 | Howard County Estimated | 93 | +158.3% |
| 69 | Burnet County Estimated | 91 | |
| 69 | Victoria County Estimated | 91 | +1,200% |
| 71 | Burleson County Estimated | 82 | +485.7% |
| 72 | Wharton County Estimated | 79 | +203.8% |
| 73 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 77 | +327.8% |
| 73 | Llano County Estimated | 77 | +1,440% |
| 75 | Reeves County Estimated | 76 | +375% |
| 75 | Uvalde County Estimated | 76 | +85.4% |
| 77 | Hale County Estimated | 74 | +221.7% |
| 78 | Yoakum County Estimated | 73 | +231.8% |
| 79 | Andrews County Estimated | 72 | +111.8% |
| 79 | Wilson County Estimated | 72 | +300% |
| 81 | Titus County Estimated | 71 | +144.8% |
| 82 | Lamar County Estimated | 70 | +600% |
| 83 | Kleberg County Estimated | 68 | +423.1% |
| 84 | Madison County Estimated | 67 | +219% |
| 85 | Hopkins County Estimated | 66 | +175% |
| 86 | Austin County Estimated | 64 | +700% |
| 86 | Kerr County Estimated | 64 | +255.6% |
| 88 | Colorado County Estimated | 62 | +121.4% |
| 88 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 62 | +463.6% |
| 90 | Gaines County Estimated | 60 | +71.4% |
| 91 | Rusk County Estimated | 57 | +78.1% |
| 92 | Garza County Estimated | 56 | +100% |
| 93 | Martin County Estimated | 54 | +1,700% |
| 94 | Parmer County Estimated | 52 | +173.7% |
| 95 | Presidio County Estimated | 51 | +410% |
| 96 | Hill County Estimated | 49 | +308.3% |
| 97 | Navarro County Estimated | 48 | +84.6% |
| 98 | Live Oak County Estimated | 46 | +557.1% |
| 99 | Harrison County Estimated | 45 | +104.5% |
| 100 | Calhoun County Estimated | 43 | +104.8% |
| 100 | Concho County Estimated | 43 | +437.5% |
| 102 | Gray County Estimated | 42 | +121.1% |
| 102 | Scurry County Estimated | 42 | +320% |
| 102 | Washington County Estimated | 42 | +75% |
| 102 | Wise County Estimated | 42 | +82.6% |
| 106 | Brewster County Estimated | 41 | +105% |
| 106 | Hood County Estimated | 41 | +1,125% |
| 108 | Pecos County Estimated | 39 | +95% |
| 108 | Swisher County Estimated | 39 | +178.6% |
| 110 | Brooks County Estimated | 38 | +90% |
| 110 | Brown County Estimated | 38 | +1,166.7% |
| 110 | Fayette County Estimated | 38 | +216.7% |
| 110 | Terry County Estimated | 38 | +245.5% |
| 114 | La Salle County Estimated | 36 | +89.5% |
| 114 | Lamb County Estimated | 36 | +800% |
| 116 | Bandera County Estimated | 35 | +483.3% |
| 117 | Hockley County Estimated | 32 | +113.3% |
| 117 | Jasper County Estimated | 32 | +300% |
| 119 | San Jacinto County Estimated | 31 | +3,200% |
| 120 | Cooke County Estimated | 30 | +130.8% |
| 121 | Somervell County Estimated | 29 | +2,800% |
| 122 | Franklin County Estimated | 28 | +833.3% |
| 122 | Hardin County Estimated | 28 | +100% |
| 124 | Camp County Estimated | 27 | +170% |
| 124 | Gonzales County Estimated | 27 | +170% |
| 124 | Henderson County Estimated | 27 | +1,450% |
| 124 | Upshur County Estimated | 27 | +237.5% |
| 128 | Castro County Estimated | 26 | +73.3% |
| 128 | Eastland County Estimated | 26 | +136.4% |
| 128 | Nolan County Estimated | 26 | +30% |
| 128 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 26 | +85.7% |
| 132 | Zapata County Estimated | 25 | +400% |
| 133 | Grimes County Estimated | 24 | +700% |
| 133 | Starr County Estimated | 24 | +260% |
| 135 | DeWitt County Estimated | 23 | +2,400% |
| 135 | Erath County Estimated | 23 | +43.8% |
| 135 | Morris County Estimated | 23 | +187.5% |
| 138 | Angelina County Estimated | 22 | +1,200% |
| 138 | Cherokee County Estimated | 22 | +1,000% |
| 138 | Falls County Estimated | 22 | +633.3% |
| 138 | Lampasas County Estimated | 22 | +340% |
| 138 | Sutton County Estimated | 22 | +266.7% |
| 143 | Hamilton County Estimated | 21 | +162.5% |
| 144 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 20 | +566.7% |
| 145 | Hall County Estimated | 19 | +216.7% |
| 145 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 19 | +533.3% |
| 145 | Leon County Estimated | 19 | +850% |
| 145 | Medina County Estimated | 19 | +111.1% |
| 149 | Bosque County Estimated | 18 | +125% |
| 149 | Houston County Estimated | 18 | +800% |
| 151 | Cochran County Estimated | 17 | +466.7% |
| 151 | Red River County Estimated | 17 | +466.7% |
| 153 | Reagan County Estimated | 16 | +300% |
| 153 | Young County Estimated | 16 | +128.6% |
| 155 | Comanche County Estimated | 15 | |
| 155 | Fannin County Estimated | 15 | +114.3% |
| 155 | Freestone County Estimated | 15 | +150% |
| 155 | Haskell County Estimated | 15 | +650% |
| 155 | Jackson County Estimated | 15 | +400% |
| 160 | Baylor County Estimated | 14 | +600% |
| 160 | Kinney County Estimated | 14 | +180% |
| 162 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 13 | +333.3% |
| 162 | Milam County Estimated | 13 | |
| 162 | Oldham County Estimated | 13 | +1,200% |
| 162 | Tyler County Estimated | 13 | |
| 162 | Wheeler County Estimated | 13 | +160% |
| 167 | Bee County Estimated | 12 | +200% |
| 167 | Crosby County Estimated | 12 | +500% |
| 169 | Archer County Estimated | 11 | +175% |
| 169 | Dawson County Estimated | 11 | +450% |
| 169 | Mitchell County Estimated | 11 | +37.5% |
| 169 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 11 | +57.1% |
| 169 | Willacy County Estimated | 11 | +120% |
| 174 | Childress County Estimated | 10 | +1,100% |
| 174 | Clay County Estimated | 10 | +150% |
| 174 | Trinity County Estimated | 10 | +400% |
| 177 | Hardeman County Estimated | 9 | +80% |
| 177 | Jack County Estimated | 9 | +28.6% |
| 177 | Montague County Estimated | 9 | +80% |
| 180 | Polk County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 180 | Rains County Estimated | 7 | +133.3% |
| 182 | Hartley County Estimated | 6 | +200% |
| 182 | Jones County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 182 | Kimble County Estimated | 6 | |
| 182 | Lavaca County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 182 | Mason County Estimated | 6 | |
| 187 | Donley County Estimated | 5 | |
| 187 | Mills County Estimated | 5 | +150% |
| 187 | Runnels County Estimated | 5 | +150% |
| 187 | Sabine County Estimated | 5 | +400% |
| 191 | Fisher County Estimated | 4 | |
| 191 | Lee County Estimated | 4 | |
| 191 | San Saba County Estimated | 4 | +500% |
| 191 | Ward County Estimated | 4 | +33.3% |
| 191 | Zavala County Estimated | 4 | +300% |
| 196 | Callahan County Estimated | 3 | |
| 196 | Dickens County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 196 | Knox County Estimated | 3 | 0% |
| 196 | Marion County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 196 | Sherman County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 201 | Blanco County Estimated | 2 | |
| 201 | Lynn County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 201 | Panola County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 201 | Refugio County Estimated | 2 | |
| 201 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 206 | Carson County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Culberson County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Delta County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Glasscock County Estimated | 1 | -80% |
| 206 | McMullen County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Menard County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Real County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Shackelford County Estimated | 1 | |
| 206 | Shelby County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 206 | Upton County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 216 | Armstrong County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Briscoe County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Coke County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Dimmit County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 216 | Duval County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 216 | Edwards County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Hemphill County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 216 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 216 | Kenedy County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Schleicher County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Sterling County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Stonewall County Estimated | 0 | |
| 216 | Terrell County Estimated | 0 | |
| 239 | Aransas County Estimated | -1 | +50% |
| 239 | Collingsworth County Estimated | -1 | |
| 239 | Crane County Estimated | -1 | |
| 239 | McCulloch County Estimated | -1 | |
| 243 | Coleman County Estimated | -2 | |
| 243 | Floyd County Estimated | -2 | -300% |
| 243 | Goliad County Estimated | -2 | |
| 243 | Jeff Davis County Estimated | -2 | -100% |
| 243 | Robertson County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 243 | San Augustine County Estimated | -2 | -300% |
| 249 | Cass County Estimated | -3 | -200% |
| 249 | Hansford County Estimated | -3 | -142.9% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2022,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2022
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2022.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10
Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 64,947 in 2022, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
Atascosa County, with -9 in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.