Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June
Harris County had the highest net international migration, July to June of 254 counties in 2014, at 34,207. San Jacinto County had the lowest, at -16. The median was 16 and the figure for Texas was 106,776. Source: the U.S. Census Bureau.
Top 40 counties, 2014
Full ranking
| Rank | Counties | 2014 | Change on 2013 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harris County Estimated | 34,207 | +33.6% |
| 2 | Dallas County Estimated | 13,791 | +37.1% |
| 3 | Tarrant County Estimated | 7,785 | +46.2% |
| 4 | Travis County Estimated | 6,413 | +28.9% |
| 5 | Bexar County Estimated | 5,841 | +23.4% |
| 6 | Collin County Estimated | 5,646 | +36.9% |
| 7 | Fort Bend County Estimated | 5,479 | +35.4% |
| 8 | Denton County Estimated | 2,592 | +28.4% |
| 9 | El Paso County Estimated | 2,559 | +19.8% |
| 10 | Brazos County Estimated | 1,727 | +32.7% |
| 11 | Montgomery County Estimated | 1,589 | +64.3% |
| 12 | Bell County Estimated | 1,562 | +5% |
| 13 | Hidalgo County Estimated | 1,425 | +29.2% |
| 14 | Williamson County Estimated | 1,315 | +33.6% |
| 15 | Webb County Estimated | 770 | +21.3% |
| 16 | Nueces County Estimated | 753 | +21.1% |
| 17 | Jefferson County Estimated | 738 | +37.2% |
| 18 | Potter County Estimated | 697 | +26.3% |
| 19 | Brazoria County Estimated | 648 | +55.4% |
| 20 | Galveston County Estimated | 563 | +2.6% |
| 21 | Cameron County Estimated | 557 | +75.7% |
| 22 | Midland County Estimated | 495 | +74.3% |
| 23 | Lubbock County Estimated | 452 | +14.7% |
| 24 | Wichita County Estimated | 449 | +6.9% |
| 25 | Taylor County Estimated | 418 | +17.4% |
| 26 | Coryell County Estimated | 403 | -3.4% |
| 27 | McLennan County Estimated | 399 | +57.7% |
| 28 | Smith County Estimated | 364 | +20.1% |
| 29 | Ector County Estimated | 302 | +80.8% |
| 30 | Hays County Estimated | 258 | +43.3% |
| 31 | Maverick County Estimated | 235 | +64.3% |
| 32 | Randall County Estimated | 215 | +28.7% |
| 33 | Walker County Estimated | 213 | +85.2% |
| 34 | Grayson County Estimated | 191 | +46.9% |
| 35 | Gregg County Estimated | 185 | +19.4% |
| 36 | Frio County Estimated | 173 | +13.1% |
| 37 | Comal County Estimated | 169 | +65.7% |
| 38 | Kleberg County Estimated | 145 | +55.9% |
| 39 | Moore County Estimated | 140 | -1.4% |
| 40 | Ellis County Estimated | 138 | +119% |
| 41 | Rockwall County Estimated | 130 | +202.3% |
| 42 | Guadalupe County Estimated | 129 | +59.3% |
| 42 | Polk County Estimated | 129 | +16.2% |
| 44 | Hunt County Estimated | 127 | +76.4% |
| 45 | Val Verde County Estimated | 118 | +28.3% |
| 46 | Bowie County Estimated | 114 | +96.6% |
| 47 | Gaines County Estimated | 108 | +40.3% |
| 48 | Nacogdoches County Estimated | 107 | +33.8% |
| 48 | Parker County Estimated | 107 | +256.7% |
| 50 | Howard County Estimated | 97 | +110.9% |
| 51 | Chambers County Estimated | 94 | +28.8% |
| 51 | Reeves County Estimated | 94 | +42.4% |
| 53 | Victoria County Estimated | 92 | +135.9% |
| 54 | Kaufman County Estimated | 89 | +140.5% |
| 55 | Starr County Estimated | 84 | +50% |
| 56 | Karnes County Estimated | 82 | +446.7% |
| 57 | Henderson County Estimated | 80 | +207.7% |
| 58 | San Patricio County Estimated | 70 | +48.9% |
| 59 | Liberty County Estimated | 68 | +65.9% |
| 60 | Van Zandt County Estimated | 65 | +80.6% |
| 61 | Hudspeth County Estimated | 63 | +472.7% |
| 62 | Presidio County Estimated | 61 | +41.9% |
| 62 | Tom Green County Estimated | 61 | -41.9% |
| 62 | Yoakum County Estimated | 61 | +35.6% |
| 65 | Haskell County Estimated | 60 | +46.3% |
| 66 | Harrison County Estimated | 58 | -31.8% |
| 66 | Hood County Estimated | 58 | -23.7% |
| 68 | Angelina County Estimated | 54 | +107.7% |
| 68 | Garza County Estimated | 54 | +285.7% |
| 70 | Cooke County Estimated | 53 | +89.3% |
| 71 | Titus County Estimated | 51 | +82.1% |
| 72 | Jim Wells County Estimated | 50 | +117.4% |
| 73 | Anderson County Estimated | 48 | +41.2% |
| 73 | Camp County Estimated | 48 | +84.6% |
| 75 | Colorado County Estimated | 47 | +14.6% |
| 75 | Parmer County Estimated | 47 | +17.5% |
| 77 | Waller County Estimated | 46 | +411.1% |
| 78 | Kendall County Estimated | 45 | +15.4% |
| 79 | Kerr County Estimated | 44 | +1,200% |
| 80 | Fannin County Estimated | 42 | +200% |
| 81 | Gillespie County Estimated | 41 | -2.4% |
| 82 | Castro County Estimated | 40 | -16.7% |
| 83 | Brown County Estimated | 39 | +34.5% |
| 83 | Calhoun County Estimated | 39 | +34.5% |
| 85 | Kinney County Estimated | 37 | +27.6% |
| 85 | Zavala County Estimated | 37 | +42.3% |
| 87 | Brooks County Estimated | 36 | -34.5% |
| 88 | Dallam County Estimated | 35 | +59.1% |
| 88 | Hansford County Estimated | 35 | +169.2% |
| 90 | Concho County Estimated | 34 | +70% |
| 91 | Bailey County Estimated | 33 | +50% |
| 92 | Burleson County Estimated | 32 | +100% |
| 92 | Hill County Estimated | 32 | +52.4% |
| 94 | Reagan County Estimated | 31 | +19.2% |
| 95 | Cherokee County Estimated | 30 | +500% |
| 95 | Limestone County Estimated | 30 | +30.4% |
| 95 | Rusk County Estimated | 30 | +236.4% |
| 98 | Dawson County Estimated | 29 | +26.1% |
| 98 | Washington County Estimated | 29 | -31% |
| 100 | Andrews County Estimated | 28 | +33.3% |
| 100 | Caldwell County Estimated | 28 | +1,033.3% |
| 100 | La Salle County Estimated | 28 | 0% |
| 103 | Hale County Estimated | 27 | +107.7% |
| 104 | Medina County Estimated | 25 | +2,600% |
| 104 | Wise County Estimated | 25 | +8.7% |
| 106 | Jim Hogg County Estimated | 24 | +71.4% |
| 106 | Wilson County Estimated | 24 | +71.4% |
| 108 | Robertson County Estimated | 23 | +35.3% |
| 109 | Deaf Smith County Estimated | 22 | +57.1% |
| 109 | Lampasas County Estimated | 22 | -43.6% |
| 109 | Upshur County Estimated | 22 | -18.5% |
| 112 | Austin County Estimated | 21 | +90.9% |
| 112 | Freestone County Estimated | 21 | +320% |
| 114 | Houston County Estimated | 20 | +81.8% |
| 115 | Blanco County Estimated | 19 | +58.3% |
| 116 | Fayette County Estimated | 18 | -10% |
| 116 | Hutchinson County Estimated | 18 | +80% |
| 116 | Mason County Estimated | 18 | +50% |
| 116 | Ochiltree County Estimated | 18 | +100% |
| 116 | Panola County Estimated | 18 | 0% |
| 116 | Runnels County Estimated | 18 | +260% |
| 116 | Young County Estimated | 18 | +800% |
| 123 | Hartley County Estimated | 17 | +54.5% |
| 123 | Madison County Estimated | 17 | +325% |
| 123 | Palo Pinto County Estimated | 17 | +54.5% |
| 123 | Willacy County Estimated | 17 | +525% |
| 127 | Martin County Estimated | 16 | -27.3% |
| 127 | Nolan County Estimated | 16 | +100% |
| 129 | Grimes County Estimated | 15 | +15.4% |
| 129 | Live Oak County Estimated | 15 | +87.5% |
| 129 | Sutton County Estimated | 15 | +150% |
| 132 | Cass County Estimated | 14 | +16.7% |
| 132 | Cochran County Estimated | 14 | +180% |
| 132 | Eastland County Estimated | 14 | -39.1% |
| 132 | Wilbarger County Estimated | 14 | +16.7% |
| 136 | Terry County Estimated | 13 | -31.6% |
| 137 | Falls County Estimated | 12 | 0% |
| 138 | Bastrop County Estimated | 11 | +135.5% |
| 138 | Comanche County Estimated | 11 | +450% |
| 138 | Jackson County Estimated | 11 | +57.1% |
| 138 | Kenedy County Estimated | 11 | +37.5% |
| 138 | Lamar County Estimated | 11 | +450% |
| 138 | Rains County Estimated | 11 | 0% |
| 138 | Trinity County Estimated | 11 | +466.7% |
| 138 | Upton County Estimated | 11 | +10% |
| 138 | Ward County Estimated | 11 | +22.2% |
| 147 | Atascosa County Estimated | 10 | +900% |
| 147 | Crane County Estimated | 10 | 0% |
| 147 | Fisher County Estimated | 10 | +900% |
| 147 | Glasscock County Estimated | 10 | +66.7% |
| 147 | Hardin County Estimated | 10 | +100% |
| 147 | Milam County Estimated | 10 | -47.4% |
| 147 | Tyler County Estimated | 10 | +11.1% |
| 147 | Winkler County Estimated | 10 | +400% |
| 155 | Clay County Estimated | 9 | +80% |
| 155 | Crockett County Estimated | 9 | +28.6% |
| 155 | Hamilton County Estimated | 9 | +12.5% |
| 155 | Lamb County Estimated | 9 | +50% |
| 155 | McMullen County Estimated | 9 | +200% |
| 155 | San Saba County Estimated | 9 | +28.6% |
| 161 | Callahan County Estimated | 8 | +60% |
| 161 | Dimmit County Estimated | 8 | -55.6% |
| 161 | Scurry County Estimated | 8 | +33.3% |
| 161 | Shelby County Estimated | 8 | -82.6% |
| 161 | Wharton County Estimated | 8 | +260% |
| 166 | Bandera County Estimated | 7 | +250% |
| 166 | Floyd County Estimated | 7 | -36.4% |
| 166 | Hockley County Estimated | 7 | +40% |
| 166 | Jones County Estimated | 7 | -41.7% |
| 166 | McCulloch County Estimated | 7 | +250% |
| 166 | Orange County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 166 | Refugio County Estimated | 7 | 0% |
| 173 | Coleman County Estimated | 6 | -14.3% |
| 173 | Collingsworth County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 173 | Erath County Estimated | 6 | +100% |
| 173 | Lavaca County Estimated | 6 | +50% |
| 173 | Lipscomb County Estimated | 6 | +20% |
| 178 | DeWitt County Estimated | 5 | +400% |
| 178 | Hardeman County Estimated | 5 | 0% |
| 178 | Hemphill County Estimated | 5 | 0% |
| 178 | Knox County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 178 | Llano County Estimated | 5 | +600% |
| 178 | Terrell County Estimated | 5 | +150% |
| 178 | Wheeler County Estimated | 5 | +66.7% |
| 185 | Bee County Estimated | 4 | -20% |
| 185 | Bosque County Estimated | 4 | +100% |
| 185 | Dickens County Estimated | 4 | +300% |
| 185 | Mills County Estimated | 4 | +300% |
| 185 | Navarro County Estimated | 4 | |
| 190 | Childress County Estimated | 3 | 0% |
| 190 | Leon County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 190 | Menard County Estimated | 3 | +50% |
| 190 | Sterling County Estimated | 3 | +200% |
| 190 | Swisher County Estimated | 3 | -25% |
| 195 | Archer County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 195 | Briscoe County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 195 | Carson County Estimated | 2 | +100% |
| 195 | Jeff Davis County Estimated | 2 | -33.3% |
| 195 | Montague County Estimated | 2 | -66.7% |
| 195 | Sherman County Estimated | 2 | -60% |
| 195 | Stonewall County Estimated | 2 | 0% |
| 202 | Coke County Estimated | 1 | |
| 202 | Crosby County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 202 | Culberson County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 202 | Donley County Estimated | 1 | -50% |
| 202 | Edwards County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 202 | Hall County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 202 | Hopkins County Estimated | 1 | +106.3% |
| 202 | Marion County Estimated | 1 | +200% |
| 202 | Mitchell County Estimated | 1 | +150% |
| 202 | Real County Estimated | 1 | 0% |
| 202 | San Augustine County Estimated | 1 | |
| 202 | Wood County Estimated | 1 | +112.5% |
| 214 | Aransas County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Armstrong County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Baylor County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Borden County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Brewster County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 214 | Cottle County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Delta County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Foard County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Gray County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Irion County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Kent County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Kimble County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 214 | King County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Loving County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Lynn County Estimated | 0 | +100% |
| 214 | Morris County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Motley County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Newton County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Oldham County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Roberts County Estimated | 0 | |
| 214 | Shackelford County Estimated | 0 | -100% |
| 214 | Throckmorton County Estimated | 0 | |
| 236 | Burnet County Estimated | -1 | +66.7% |
| 236 | Duval County Estimated | -1 | -125% |
| 236 | Goliad County Estimated | -1 | 0% |
| 236 | Schleicher County Estimated | -1 | +75% |
| 240 | Red River County Estimated | -2 | 0% |
| 240 | Sabine County Estimated | -2 | |
| 240 | Somervell County Estimated | -2 | +33.3% |
| 243 | Jack County Estimated | -3 | |
| 243 | Matagorda County Estimated | -3 | +50% |
| 243 | Pecos County Estimated | -3 | 0% |
| 246 | Lee County Estimated | -4 | 0% |
| 247 | Franklin County Estimated | -5 | -400% |
| 247 | Jasper County Estimated | -5 | +37.5% |
| 249 | Stephens County Estimated | -6 | -50% |
| 249 | Zapata County Estimated | -6 | 0% |
Other periods
About this ranking
Estimated moves into the area from abroad minus moves out of the area to other countries, from July 1 of the previous year through June 30 of the reported year. United States: Census Bureau estimates, including people born in the United States and abroad, moves between the states and Puerto Rico, and net movement of the Armed Forces overseas. Canada: Statistics Canada immigrants, minus net emigration, plus the net change in non-permanent residents. Australia: ABS net overseas migration for the financial year. United Kingdom local authorities: Office for National Statistics mid-year estimates, counting people who move for at least 12 months.
A component of each country's official population estimates. Methods differ between the statistical offices, so compare places within a country first. Differs from the World Bank net_migration series, which uses calendar years and a different method.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the counties are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.Citation styles
APA 7
U.S. Census Bureau. (2026). Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021 (Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
MLA 9
Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014. U.S. Census Bureau, 26 Mar. 2026, https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
U.S. Census Bureau. 2026. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014.
Harvard
U.S. Census Bureau (2026) Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021, Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014 [Dataset]. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).
BibTeX
@misc{census_counties_in_texas_by_2014,
author = {{U.S. Census Bureau}},
title = {{Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Data set},
url = {https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html},
urldate = {2026-10-12},
note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014. Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY - DATA
AU - U.S. Census Bureau
TI - Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021: Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June, 2014
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/03/26
PB - U.S. Census Bureau
DB - Invokely
UR - https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html
L2 - https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014
Y2 - 2026/10/12
N1 - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/net-international-migration-july-june/texas-counties?period=2014.
N1 - Publisher attribution: U.S. Census Bureau. Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/data/data-sets.html. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER -
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank Counties in Texas by net international migration, July to June using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"net_international_migration_july_june","level":"province","within":"Texas","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=net_international_migration_july_june&level=province&within=Texas&limit=10Questions
Which county has the highest net international migration, July to June?
Harris County, with 34,207 in 2014, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
Which county has the lowest net international migration, July to June?
San Jacinto County, with -16 in 2014.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Estimates Program: net international migration, July 1 of the previous year to June 30 of the reported year; vintage 2020 files for 2011 to 2020 and the latest 2020s vintage from 2021. Retrieved 2026-10-12.