NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change

Gdański had the highest natural population change of 73 areas in 2020, at 1,920. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -5,247. The median was -1,578 and the figure for Poland was -122,046. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Keep it in a collection in your library.
Highest1,920Gdański
Lowest-5,247Miasto Łódź
Median-1,57873 areas
Poland-122,046History

Top 40 areas, 2020

Gdański: 1,920 personsGdański1,920Poznański: 1,602 personsPoznański1,602Nowosądecki: 498 personsNowosądecki498Warszawski wschodni: 60 personsWarszawski wschodni60Rzeszowski: -43 personsRzeszowski-43Miasto Kraków: -65 personsMiasto Kraków-65Chojnicki: -66 personsChojnicki-66Krakowski: -196 personsKrakowski-196Nowotarski: -255 personsNowotarski-255Leszczyński: -289 personsLeszczyński-289Warszawski zachodni: -406 personsWarszawski zachodni-406Świecki: -413 personsŚwiecki-413Tyski: -594 personsTyski-594Miasto Wrocław: -624 personsMiasto Wrocław-624Wrocławski: -632 personsWrocławski-632Starogardzki: -688 personsStarogardzki-688Białostocki: -787 personsBiałostocki-787Miasto Poznań: -793 personsMiasto Poznań-793Słupski: -795 personsSłupski-795Ełcki: -898 personsEłcki-898Pilski: -953 personsPilski-953Żyrardowski: -1,022 personsŻyrardowski-1,022Ostrołęcki: -1,072 personsOstrołęcki-1,072Siedlecki: -1,099 personsSiedlecki-1,099Tarnowski: -1,112 personsTarnowski-1,112Suwalski: -1,151 personsSuwalski-1,151Grudziądzki: -1,268 personsGrudziądzki-1,268Bialski: -1,369 personsBialski-1,369Ciechanowski: -1,399 personsCiechanowski-1,399Inowrocławski: -1,420 personsInowrocławski-1,420Krośnieński: -1,453 personsKrośnieński-1,453Miasto Warszawa: -1,512 personsMiasto Warszawa-1,512Przemyski: -1,512 personsPrzemyski-1,512Trójmiejski: -1,539 personsTrójmiejski-1,539Gorzowski: -1,546 personsGorzowski-1,546Tarnobrzeski: -1,557 personsTarnobrzeski-1,557Koszaliński: -1,578 personsKoszaliński-1,578Legnicko-głogowski: -1,689 personsLegnicko-głogowski-1,689Lubelski: -1,725 personsLubelski-1,725Płocki: -1,743 personsPłocki-1,743Gdański: 1,920 personsGdański1,920Poznański: 1,602 personsPoznański1,602Nowosądecki: 498 personsNowosądecki498Warszawski wschodni: 60 personsWarszawski wschodni60Rzeszowski: -43 personsRzeszowski-43Miasto Kraków: -65 personsMiasto Kraków-65Chojnicki: -66 personsChojnicki-66Krakowski: -196 personsKrakowski-196Nowotarski: -255 personsNowotarski-255Leszczyński: -289 personsLeszczyński-289Warszawski zachodni: -406 personsWarszawski zachodni-406Świecki: -413 personsŚwiecki-413Tyski: -594 personsTyski-594Miasto Wrocław: -624 personsMiasto Wrocław-624Wrocławski: -632 personsWrocławski-632Starogardzki: -688 personsStarogardzki-688Białostocki: -787 personsBiałostocki-787Miasto Poznań: -793 personsMiasto Poznań-793Słupski: -795 personsSłupski-795Ełcki: -898 personsEłcki-898Pilski: -953 personsPilski-953Żyrardowski: -1,022 personsŻyrardowski-1,022Ostrołęcki: -1,072 personsOstrołęcki-1,072Siedlecki: -1,099 personsSiedlecki-1,099Tarnowski: -1,112 personsTarnowski-1,112Suwalski: -1,151 personsSuwalski-1,151Grudziądzki: -1,268 personsGrudziądzki-1,268Bialski: -1,369 personsBialski-1,369Ciechanowski: -1,399 personsCiechanowski-1,399Inowrocławski: -1,420 personsInowrocławski-1,420Krośnieński: -1,453 personsKrośnieński-1,453Miasto Warszawa: -1,512 personsMiasto Warszawa-1,512Przemyski: -1,512 personsPrzemyski-1,512Trójmiejski: -1,539 personsTrójmiejski-1,539Gorzowski: -1,546 personsGorzowski-1,546Tarnobrzeski: -1,557 personsTarnobrzeski-1,557Koszaliński: -1,578 personsKoszaliński-1,578Legnicko-głogowski: -1,689 personsLegnicko-głogowski-1,689Lubelski: -1,725 personsLubelski-1,725Płocki: -1,743 personsPłocki-1,743
persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

RankAreas2020
persons
Change on 2019
1Gdański1,920-39.6%
2Poznański1,602-35.3%
3Nowosądecki498-71.7%
4Warszawski wschodni60-95.3%
5Rzeszowski-43-103.3%
6Miasto Kraków-65-104.3%
7Chojnicki-66-112.7%
8Krakowski-196-119.3%
9Nowotarski-255-147%
10Leszczyński-289-136.7%
11Warszawski zachodni-406-154.9%
12Świecki-413-2,850%
13Tyski-594-366.4%
14Miasto Wrocław-624-211.2%
15Wrocławski-632-200.8%
16Starogardzki-688-445.7%
17Białostocki-787-429.3%
18Miasto Poznań-793-367.9%
19Słupski-795-285.9%
20Ełcki-898-124.5%
21Pilski-953-1,034.5%
22Żyrardowski-1,022-186.3%
23Ostrołęcki-1,072-2,044%
24Siedlecki-1,099-852.7%
25Tarnowski-1,112-6,441.2%
26Suwalski-1,151-305.3%
27Grudziądzki-1,268-264.4%
28Bialski-1,369-152.1%
29Ciechanowski-1,399-183.8%
30Inowrocławski-1,420-133.6%
31Krośnieński-1,453-239.5%
32Miasto Warszawa-1,512-166.3%
32Przemyski-1,512-369.6%
34Trójmiejski-1,539-1,470.4%
35Gorzowski-1,546-113.2%
36Tarnobrzeski-1,557-6,869.6%
37Koszaliński-1,578-141.3%
38Legnicko-głogowski-1,689-153.2%
39Lubelski-1,725-3,770.2%
40Płocki-1,743-183.9%
41Szczeciński-1,781-143.3%
42Olsztyński-1,827-107.4%
43Kaliski-1,833-554.6%
44Miasto Szczecin-1,847-71%
45Koniński-1,862-18,720%
46Gliwicki-1,907-86.4%
47Elbląski-1,922-173.8%
48Włocławski-1,964-74.6%
49Skierniewicki-2,073-63.4%
50Szczecinecko-pyrzycki-2,099-51%
51Sieradzki-2,105-87.1%
52Łomżyński-2,127-90.9%
53Rybnicki-2,137-219.9%
54Bielski-2,152-332.1%
55Nyski-2,208-65.1%
56Puławski-2,263-138.2%
57Łódzki-2,264-87.4%
58Oświęcimski-2,317-169.4%
59Bydgosko-toruński-2,387-262.2%
60Bytomski-2,438-101.3%
61Zielonogórski-2,445-86.8%
62Opolski-2,557-195.9%
63Radomski-2,602-153.4%
64Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski-3,091-69.4%
65Piotrkowski-3,227-110.2%
66Częstochowski-3,311-52.6%
67Jeleniogórski-3,677-42.7%
68Chełmsko-zamojski-3,853-68.8%
69Katowicki-4,273-78.4%
70Kielecki-4,730-93.1%
71Sosnowiecki-5,091-44.8%
72Wałbrzyski-5,246-40.2%
73Miasto Łódź-5,247-37.1%

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year. A negative value means more deaths than births (Eurostat).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX
@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2020,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}
RIS
TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2020
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2020.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  - 
Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural population change?

Gdański, with 1,920 in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural population change?

Miasto Łódź, with -5,247 in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Natural population change: other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings