NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change

Gdański had the highest natural population change of 73 areas in 2015, at 3,089. Miasto Łódź had the lowest, at -4,415. The median was -204 and the figure for Poland was -25,613. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest3,089Gdański

Lowest-4,415Miasto Łódź

Median-20473 areas

Poland-25,613History

Top 40 areas, 2015

persons. Source: Eurostat, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Full ranking

Rank	Areas	2015 persons	Change on 2014
1	Gdański	3,089	-1.3%
2	Poznański	2,695	+5.8%
3	Nowosądecki	1,827	-6.5%
4	Warszawski zachodni	1,357	+14.7%
5	Warszawski wschodni	1,322	-18.2%
6	Miasto Warszawa	1,313	-15.4%
7	Leszczyński	1,168	-22.4%
8	Krakowski	865	-32.3%
9	Rzeszowski	770	-40.4%
10	Tyski	694	-26.5%
11	Nowotarski	444	-30.8%
12	Chojnicki	441	-29.6%
13	Miasto Kraków	415	-15%
14	Wrocławski	334	-58.8%
15	Starogardzki	301	-57.8%
16	Siedlecki	295	-30.9%
17	Słupski	158	-62.4%
18	Ostrołęcki	131	-59.7%
19	Tarnowski	109	-77.1%
20	Lubelski	108	+3,700%
21	Świecki	98	-66.3%
22	Pilski	51	-86.1%
23	Tarnobrzeski	27	-77.5%
24	Ełcki	23	-88.8%
25	Bielski	-16	-103.2%
26	Koniński	-44	-105.8%
27	Bydgosko-toruński	-107	-192.2%
28	Białostocki	-119	-203.5%
29	Kaliski	-131	-119.6%
30	Miasto Poznań	-148	-243.7%
31	Suwalski	-157	-9%
31	Żyrardowski	-157	+13.3%
33	Rybnicki	-165	-130.6%
34	Gorzowski	-185	-225%
34	Inowrocławski	-185	-236.4%
36	Legnicko-głogowski	-192	-206.1%
37	Grudziądzki	-204	-159.6%
38	Szczeciński	-225	-238.9%
39	Krośnieński	-295	-205%
40	Bialski	-309	-62.6%
41	Elbląski	-315	-263.2%
42	Oświęcimski	-323	-1,053.6%
43	Przemyski	-355	-248%
44	Ciechanowski	-422	-15.6%
45	Trójmiejski	-428	-5.4%
46	Miasto Wrocław	-439	-642%
47	Olsztyński	-445	-196.5%
48	Koszaliński	-459	-232.6%
49	Płocki	-528	-34.7%
50	Zielonogórski	-551	-3,773.3%
51	Szczecinecko-pyrzycki	-615	-212.2%
52	Gliwicki	-679	-49.2%
53	Opolski	-823	-110.5%
54	Miasto Szczecin	-879	-52.6%
55	Radomski	-885	-70.2%
56	Włocławski	-935	-35.3%
57	Łódzki	-978	-5.2%
58	Skierniewicki	-1,047	-46.6%
59	Puławski	-1,084	-92.5%
60	Sieradzki	-1,173	-49%
61	Łomżyński	-1,201	-51.6%
62	Bytomski	-1,270	-60.4%
63	Nyski	-1,356	-64.6%
64	Piotrkowski	-1,399	-95.9%
65	Jeleniogórski	-1,787	-25.8%
66	Chełmsko-zamojski	-1,816	-19.2%
67	Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski	-1,907	-21.2%
68	Kielecki	-1,923	-48.3%
69	Częstochowski	-1,978	-22.2%
70	Katowicki	-2,328	-40.3%
71	Sosnowiecki	-3,068	-19.3%
72	Wałbrzyski	-3,198	-33.9%
73	Miasto Łódź	-4,415	-13.8%

Other periods

About this ranking

Live births minus deaths during the year. A negative value means more deaths than births (Eurostat).

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.

Citation styles

The publisher is the author. Invokely is named only as the place the figures were read, where a style asks for it.

APA 7

Eurostat, European Commission. (2026). Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3) (NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015) [Data set]. Retrieved October 12, 2026, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table

MLA 9

Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015. Eurostat, European Commission, 21 July 2026, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015. Accessed 12 Oct. 2026.

Chicago (author-date)

Eurostat, European Commission. 2026. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015. Dataset. Accessed October 12, 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Also distributed by Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015.

Harvard

Eurostat, European Commission (2026) Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3), NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015 [Dataset]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table, via Invokely: https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015 (Accessed: 12 October 2026).

BibTeX

@misc{eurostat_nuts_3_areas_of_2015,
  author = {{Eurostat, European Commission}},
  title = {{Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Data set},
  url = {https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table},
  urldate = {2026-10-12},
  note = {Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015. Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo\_r\_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo\_r\_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.},
}

RIS

TY  - DATA
AU  - Eurostat, European Commission
TI  - Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3): NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/21
PB  - Eurostat, European Commission
DB  - Invokely
UR  - https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table
L2  - https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015
Y2  - 2026/10/12
N1  - Accessed via Invokely, https://invokely.ai/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015.
N1  - Publisher attribution: Eurostat. Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_gind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-12.
ER  -

Embed this chart

Paste this code into a web page or a blog post. The chart shows the latest figures as they are published, with the source and a link back to this page.

Embed code

<iframe src="https://invokely.ai/embed/rankings/natural-population-change/poland-provinces?period=2015" width="760" height="500" title="NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change, 2015, chart from Invokely" loading="lazy" style="border:0;width:100%;max-width:760px" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"></iframe>

Sites that read oEmbed links, such as WordPress, can show the chart when you paste the link to this page.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by natural population change using official data, and cite the source.

rank_places {"indicator":"natural_change","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=natural_change&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest natural population change?

Gdański, with 3,089 in 2015, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest natural population change?

Miasto Łódź, with -4,415 in 2015.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population change, natural change of population, by NUTS 2 and 3 region (demo_r_gind3). Retrieved 2026-10-12.