Data / Rankings / Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base), 2025

Miasto Łódź had the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) of 73 areas in 2025, at 61.5%. Miasto Kraków had the lowest, at 51.6%. The median was 55.8% and the figure for Poland was 55.7%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest61.5Miasto Łódź
Lowest51.6Miasto Kraków
Median55.873 areas
Poland55.7History

Top 40 areas, 2025

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 61.5 %61.5SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 60.2 %60.2WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 59.9 %59.9KieleckiKielecki: 59.6 %59.6PuławskiPuławski: 59.2 %59.2Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 58.9 %58.9ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 58.8 %58.8CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 58.5 %58.5SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 58.5 %58.5SiedleckiSiedlecki: 58.4 %58.4Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 58.2 %58.2Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 57.9 %57.9JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 57.8 %57.8KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 57.7 %57.7Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 57.5 %57.5RadomskiRadomski: 57.4 %57.4PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 57.3 %57.3NyskiNyski: 57.2 %57.2Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 57.1 %57.1BielskiBielski: 57 %57OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 57 %57ŁódzkiŁódzki: 56.8 %56.8SłupskiSłupski: 56.8 %56.8BialskiBialski: 56.7 %56.7SieradzkiSieradzki: 56.7 %56.7KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 56.6 %56.6GliwickiGliwicki: 56.5 %56.5LubelskiLubelski: 56.5 %56.5TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 56.5 %56.5BiałostockiBiałostocki: 56.4 %56.4ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 56.4 %56.4TarnobrzeskiTarnobrzeski: 56.1 %56.1WłocławskiWłocławski: 56.1 %56.1ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 56.1 %56.1Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 56 %56KatowickiKatowicki: 55.9 %55.9ŚwieckiŚwiecki: 55.8 %55.8OpolskiOpolski: 55.6 %55.6OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 55.6 %55.6ChojnickiChojnicki: 55.5 %55.5
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankAreas2025 (%)Change on 2024
1Miasto Łódź61.5+0.4 pts
2Sosnowiecki60.2+0.6 pts
3Wałbrzyski59.9+1 pts
4Kielecki59.6+0.8 pts
5Puławski59.2+0.6 pts
6Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski58.9+0.8 pts
7Łomżyński58.8+0.9 pts
8Częstochowski58.5+0.7 pts
8Skierniewicki58.5+0.8 pts
10Siedlecki58.4+0.7 pts
11Chełmsko-zamojski58.2+1 pts
12Legnicko-głogowski57.9+0.6 pts
13Jeleniogórski57.8+0.8 pts
14Koszaliński57.7+0.8 pts
15Szczecinecko-pyrzycki57.5+0.9 pts
16Radomski57.4+0.7 pts
17Piotrkowski57.3+0.5 pts
18Nyski57.2+0.7 pts
19Miasto Szczecin57.1+0.4 pts
20Bielski57+0.2 pts
20Oświęcimski57+0.6 pts
22Łódzki56.80 pts
22Słupski56.8+0.8 pts
24Bialski56.7+0.8 pts
24Sieradzki56.7+0.6 pts
26Krośnieński56.6+0.9 pts
27Gliwicki56.5+0.8 pts
27Lubelski56.5+0.3 pts
27Trójmiejski56.50 pts
30Białostocki56.4+0.7 pts
30Żyrardowski56.4+0.3 pts
32Tarnobrzeski56.1+0.7 pts
32Włocławski56.1+0.6 pts
32Zielonogórski56.1+0.6 pts
35Bydgosko-toruński56+0.3 pts
36Katowicki55.9+0.7 pts
37Świecki55.8+0.6 pts
38Opolski55.6+0.9 pts
38Ostrołęcki55.6+0.7 pts
40Chojnicki55.5+0.4 pts
40Przemyski55.5+0.8 pts
42Elbląski55.4+0.7 pts
42Kaliski55.4+0.5 pts
44Bytomski55.3+0.5 pts
44Ciechanowski55.3+0.8 pts
44Inowrocławski55.3+0.6 pts
44Rybnicki55.3+0.4 pts
44Tyski55.3+0.5 pts
49Płocki55.2+0.4 pts
50Grudziądzki55.1+0.5 pts
50Suwalski55.1+1 pts
50Tarnowski55.1+0.6 pts
53Olsztyński55+0.8 pts
54Szczeciński54.9+0.7 pts
55Gorzowski54.8+0.7 pts
55Koniński54.8+0.4 pts
57Ełcki54.7+0.9 pts
58Leszczyński54.6+0.3 pts
58Nowosądecki54.6+0.3 pts
58Pilski54.6+0.4 pts
58Rzeszowski54.6+0.4 pts
62Nowotarski54.2+0.5 pts
63Krakowski53.9+0.1 pts
64Starogardzki53.7+0.3 pts
65Wrocławski53.6+0.1 pts
66Warszawski zachodni53.5-0.4 pts
67Miasto Poznań53.3+0.3 pts
67Warszawski wschodni53.3-0.5 pts
69Miasto Warszawa52.6-0.4 pts
70Miasto Wrocław520 pts
71Gdański51.8-0.2 pts
72Poznański51.7-0.2 pts
73Miasto Kraków51.6+0.1 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Population aged 0 to 14 plus population aged 65 and over, divided by population aged 15 to 64, times 100, on 1 January (Eurostat).

Eurostat age bands. dependency_ratio (INE, Spain) splits the ages at 16, so values for Spanish places differ between the two.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"dependency_ratio_15_64","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=dependency_ratio_15_64&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Łódź, with 61.5% in 2025, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Kraków, with 51.6% in 2025.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base): other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings