NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)

Miasto Łódź had the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) of 73 areas in 2022, at 58.6%. Miasto Kraków had the lowest, at 50.2%. The median was 53.4% and the figure for Poland was 53.6%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest58.6Miasto Łódź
Lowest50.2Miasto Kraków
Median53.473 areas
Poland53.6History

Top 40 areas, 2022

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 58.6 %58.6SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 57.1 %57.1PuławskiPuławski: 56.8 %56.8KieleckiKielecki: 56.5 %56.5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 56.2 %56.2WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 56 %56SiedleckiSiedlecki: 55.9 %55.9SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 55.6 %55.6BielskiBielski: 55.4 %55.4CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 55.4 %55.4ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 55.4 %55.4TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 55.3 %55.3ŁódzkiŁódzki: 55.2 %55.2Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 55.1 %55.1PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 55.1 %55.1Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 54.9 %54.9Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 54.8 %54.8OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 54.6 %54.6LubelskiLubelski: 54.5 %54.5RadomskiRadomski: 54.5 %54.5JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 54.4 %54.4KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 54.3 %54.3SieradzkiSieradzki: 54.3 %54.3ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 54.3 %54.3NyskiNyski: 54.2 %54.2Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 54.1 %54.1Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 54 %54BialskiBialski: 53.8 %53.8KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 53.8 %53.8ChojnickiChojnicki: 53.7 %53.7SłupskiSłupski: 53.7 %53.7KatowickiKatowicki: 53.5 %53.5BiałostockiBiałostocki: 53.4 %53.4RybnickiRybnicki: 53.4 %53.4Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 53.4 %53.4Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 53.4 %53.4WłocławskiWłocławski: 53.4 %53.4ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 53.4 %53.4KaliskiKaliski: 53.3 %53.3ŚwieckiŚwiecki: 53.3 %53.3
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankAreas2022 (%)Change on 2021
1Miasto Łódź Estimated58.6+1.4 pts
2Sosnowiecki Estimated57.1+1.6 pts
3Puławski Estimated56.8+0.8 pts
4Kielecki Estimated56.5+1.3 pts
5Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Estimated56.2+1.2 pts
6Wałbrzyski Estimated56+1.5 pts
7Siedlecki Estimated55.9+0.9 pts
8Skierniewicki Estimated55.6+1 pts
9Bielski Estimated55.4+0.9 pts
9Częstochowski Estimated55.4+1.2 pts
9Łomżyński Estimated55.4+0.9 pts
12Trójmiejski Estimated55.3+1 pts
13Łódzki Estimated55.2+0.9 pts
14Legnicko-głogowski Estimated55.1+1.4 pts
14Piotrkowski Estimated55.1+1.1 pts
16Chełmsko-zamojski Estimated54.9+1 pts
17Miasto Szczecin Estimated54.8+1.4 pts
18Oświęcimski Estimated54.6+1 pts
19Lubelski Estimated54.5+0.8 pts
19Radomski Estimated54.5+1.1 pts
21Jeleniogórski Estimated54.4+1.6 pts
22Koszaliński Estimated54.3+1.4 pts
22Sieradzki Estimated54.3+1 pts
22Żyrardowski Estimated54.3+0.9 pts
25Nyski Estimated54.2+1.4 pts
26Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Estimated54.1+1.5 pts
27Bydgosko-toruński Estimated54+1.1 pts
28Bialski Estimated53.8+0.9 pts
28Krośnieński Estimated53.8+1 pts
30Chojnicki Estimated53.7+1.2 pts
30Słupski Estimated53.7+1.3 pts
32Katowicki Estimated53.5+0.8 pts
33Białostocki Estimated53.4+1.1 pts
33Rybnicki Estimated53.4+0.7 pts
33Warszawski wschodni Estimated53.4+0.6 pts
33Warszawski zachodni Estimated53.4+0.7 pts
33Włocławski Estimated53.4+1.1 pts
33Zielonogórski Estimated53.4+1.3 pts
39Kaliski Estimated53.3+1 pts
39Świecki Estimated53.3+1.1 pts
39Tarnobrzeski Estimated53.3+1 pts
42Gliwicki Estimated53.2+1.2 pts
42Nowosądecki Estimated53.2+0.6 pts
42Płocki Estimated53.2+0.8 pts
45Bytomski Estimated53.1+1.1 pts
45Ostrołęcki Estimated53.1+0.9 pts
47Przemyski Estimated53+1 pts
47Tarnowski Estimated53+0.7 pts
49Leszczyński Estimated52.9+1 pts
49Rzeszowski Estimated52.9+0.7 pts
51Grudziądzki Estimated52.8+1.1 pts
51Koniński Estimated52.8+1 pts
51Krakowski Estimated52.8+0.8 pts
51Tyski Estimated52.8+1.4 pts
55Inowrocławski Estimated52.7+1.1 pts
55Miasto Warszawa Estimated52.7+0.4 pts
57Elbląski Estimated52.6+1.1 pts
57Nowotarski Estimated52.6+0.8 pts
59Ciechanowski Estimated52.5+1 pts
59Pilski Estimated52.5+1 pts
61Gorzowski Estimated52.3+1 pts
61Opolski Estimated52.3+1.1 pts
63Wrocławski Estimated52.2+1 pts
64Starogardzki Estimated52.1+1.1 pts
65Olsztyński Estimated52+1.2 pts
65Suwalski Estimated52+0.9 pts
67Szczeciński Estimated51.9+1.5 pts
68Ełcki Estimated51.7+1.1 pts
68Miasto Poznań Estimated51.7+0.8 pts
70Gdański Estimated51.3+0.8 pts
71Poznański Estimated51.1+0.8 pts
72Miasto Wrocław Estimated50.5+1 pts
73Miasto Kraków Estimated50.2+0.9 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Population aged 0 to 14 plus population aged 65 and over, divided by population aged 15 to 64, times 100, on 1 January (Eurostat).

Eurostat age bands. dependency_ratio (INE, Spain) splits the ages at 16, so values for Spanish places differ between the two.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"dependency_ratio_15_64","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=dependency_ratio_15_64&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Łódź, with 58.6% in 2022, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Kraków, with 50.2% in 2022.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base): other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings