NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)
Miasto Łódź had the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) of 73 areas in 2023, at 60%. Miasto Kraków had the lowest, at 51%. The median was 54.5% and the figure for Poland was 54.6%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2023
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2023 (%) | Change on 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miasto Łódź Estimated | 60 | +1.4 pts |
| 2 | Sosnowiecki Estimated | 58.5 | +1.4 pts |
| 3 | Kielecki Estimated | 57.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 3 | Puławski Estimated | 57.8 | +1 pts |
| 5 | Wałbrzyski Estimated | 57.5 | +1.5 pts |
| 6 | Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski Estimated | 57.2 | +1 pts |
| 7 | Siedlecki Estimated | 56.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 7 | Skierniewicki Estimated | 56.8 | +1.2 pts |
| 9 | Łomżyński Estimated | 56.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 10 | Częstochowski Estimated | 56.6 | +1.2 pts |
| 11 | Legnicko-głogowski Estimated | 56.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 12 | Chełmsko-zamojski Estimated | 56.3 | +1.4 pts |
| 13 | Bielski Estimated | 56.2 | +0.8 pts |
| 13 | Łódzki Estimated | 56.2 | +1 pts |
| 15 | Trójmiejski Estimated | 56.1 | +0.8 pts |
| 16 | Piotrkowski Estimated | 56 | +0.9 pts |
| 17 | Miasto Szczecin Estimated | 55.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 18 | Jeleniogórski Estimated | 55.8 | +1.4 pts |
| 18 | Radomski Estimated | 55.8 | +1.3 pts |
| 20 | Koszaliński Estimated | 55.7 | +1.4 pts |
| 20 | Oświęcimski Estimated | 55.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 22 | Lubelski Estimated | 55.5 | +1 pts |
| 23 | Nyski Estimated | 55.4 | +1.2 pts |
| 23 | Szczecinecko-pyrzycki Estimated | 55.4 | +1.3 pts |
| 25 | Sieradzki Estimated | 55.3 | +1 pts |
| 25 | Żyrardowski Estimated | 55.3 | +1 pts |
| 27 | Bydgosko-toruński Estimated | 55 | +1 pts |
| 27 | Słupski Estimated | 55 | +1.3 pts |
| 29 | Bialski Estimated | 54.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 29 | Krośnieński Estimated | 54.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 31 | Białostocki Estimated | 54.7 | +1.3 pts |
| 32 | Chojnicki Estimated | 54.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 32 | Gliwicki Estimated | 54.6 | +1.4 pts |
| 34 | Katowicki Estimated | 54.5 | +1 pts |
| 34 | Świecki Estimated | 54.5 | +1.2 pts |
| 34 | Włocławski Estimated | 54.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 34 | Zielonogórski Estimated | 54.5 | +1.1 pts |
| 38 | Tarnobrzeski Estimated | 54.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 39 | Rybnicki Estimated | 54.3 | +0.9 pts |
| 40 | Kaliski Estimated | 54.2 | +0.9 pts |
| 40 | Ostrołęcki Estimated | 54.2 | +1.1 pts |
| 42 | Płocki Estimated | 54.1 | +0.9 pts |
| 43 | Bytomski Estimated | 54 | +0.9 pts |
| 43 | Tyski Estimated | 54 | +1.2 pts |
| 43 | Warszawski zachodni Estimated | 54 | +0.6 pts |
| 46 | Grudziądzki Estimated | 53.9 | +1.1 pts |
| 46 | Inowrocławski Estimated | 53.9 | +1.2 pts |
| 46 | Przemyski Estimated | 53.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 46 | Tarnowski Estimated | 53.9 | +0.9 pts |
| 50 | Koniński Estimated | 53.8 | +1 pts |
| 50 | Leszczyński Estimated | 53.8 | +0.9 pts |
| 50 | Nowosądecki Estimated | 53.8 | +0.6 pts |
| 50 | Warszawski wschodni Estimated | 53.8 | +0.4 pts |
| 54 | Elbląski Estimated | 53.7 | +1.1 pts |
| 54 | Rzeszowski Estimated | 53.7 | +0.8 pts |
| 56 | Ciechanowski Estimated | 53.6 | +1.1 pts |
| 56 | Opolski Estimated | 53.6 | +1.3 pts |
| 58 | Pilski Estimated | 53.5 | +1 pts |
| 59 | Gorzowski Estimated | 53.4 | +1.1 pts |
| 59 | Krakowski Estimated | 53.4 | +0.6 pts |
| 61 | Nowotarski Estimated | 53.2 | +0.6 pts |
| 61 | Olsztyński Estimated | 53.2 | +1.2 pts |
| 63 | Miasto Warszawa Estimated | 53.1 | +0.4 pts |
| 63 | Szczeciński Estimated | 53.1 | +1.2 pts |
| 65 | Suwalski Estimated | 53 | +1 pts |
| 65 | Wrocławski Estimated | 53 | +0.8 pts |
| 67 | Starogardzki Estimated | 52.9 | +0.8 pts |
| 68 | Ełcki Estimated | 52.8 | +1.1 pts |
| 69 | Miasto Poznań Estimated | 52.6 | +0.9 pts |
| 70 | Gdański Estimated | 51.8 | +0.5 pts |
| 71 | Poznański Estimated | 51.7 | +0.6 pts |
| 72 | Miasto Wrocław Estimated | 51.5 | +1 pts |
| 73 | Miasto Kraków Estimated | 51 | +0.8 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
Population aged 0 to 14 plus population aged 65 and over, divided by population aged 15 to 64, times 100, on 1 January (Eurostat).
Eurostat age bands. dependency_ratio (INE, Spain) splits the ages at 16, so values for Spanish places differ between the two.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"dependency_ratio_15_64","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=dependency_ratio_15_64&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10Questions
Which area has the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?
Miasto Łódź, with 60% in 2023, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?
Miasto Kraków, with 51% in 2023.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-09.
Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)