NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)

Miasto Łódź had the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) of 73 areas in 2024, at 61.1%. Miasto Kraków had the lowest, at 51.5%. The median was 55.2% and the figure for Poland was 55.3%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest61.1Miasto Łódź
Lowest51.5Miasto Kraków
Median55.273 areas
Poland55.3History

Top 40 areas, 2024

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 61.1 %61.1SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 59.6 %59.6WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 58.9 %58.9KieleckiKielecki: 58.8 %58.8PuławskiPuławski: 58.6 %58.6Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 58.1 %58.1ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 57.9 %57.9CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 57.8 %57.8SiedleckiSiedlecki: 57.7 %57.7SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 57.7 %57.7Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 57.3 %57.3Chełmsko-zamojskiChełmsko-zamojski: 57.2 %57.2JeleniogórskiJeleniogórski: 57 %57KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 56.9 %56.9BielskiBielski: 56.8 %56.8ŁódzkiŁódzki: 56.8 %56.8PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 56.8 %56.8Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 56.7 %56.7RadomskiRadomski: 56.7 %56.7Szczecinecko-pyrzyckiSzczecinecko-pyrzycki: 56.6 %56.6NyskiNyski: 56.5 %56.5TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 56.5 %56.5OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 56.4 %56.4LubelskiLubelski: 56.2 %56.2SieradzkiSieradzki: 56.1 %56.1ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 56.1 %56.1SłupskiSłupski: 56 %56BialskiBialski: 55.9 %55.9BiałostockiBiałostocki: 55.7 %55.7Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 55.7 %55.7GliwickiGliwicki: 55.7 %55.7KrośnieńskiKrośnieński: 55.7 %55.7WłocławskiWłocławski: 55.5 %55.5ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 55.5 %55.5TarnobrzeskiTarnobrzeski: 55.4 %55.4KatowickiKatowicki: 55.2 %55.2ŚwieckiŚwiecki: 55.2 %55.2ChojnickiChojnicki: 55.1 %55.1KaliskiKaliski: 54.9 %54.9OstrołęckiOstrołęcki: 54.9 %54.9
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankAreas2024 (%)Change on 2023
1Miasto Łódź61.1+1.1 pts
2Sosnowiecki59.6+1.1 pts
3Wałbrzyski58.9+1.4 pts
4Kielecki58.8+1 pts
5Puławski58.6+0.8 pts
6Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski58.1+0.9 pts
7Łomżyński57.9+1.2 pts
8Częstochowski57.8+1.2 pts
9Siedlecki57.7+0.9 pts
9Skierniewicki57.7+0.9 pts
11Legnicko-głogowski57.3+0.9 pts
12Chełmsko-zamojski57.2+0.9 pts
13Jeleniogórski57+1.2 pts
14Koszaliński56.9+1.2 pts
15Bielski56.8+0.6 pts
15Łódzki56.8+0.6 pts
15Piotrkowski56.8+0.8 pts
18Miasto Szczecin56.7+0.8 pts
18Radomski56.7+0.9 pts
20Szczecinecko-pyrzycki56.6+1.2 pts
21Nyski56.5+1.1 pts
21Trójmiejski56.5+0.4 pts
23Oświęcimski56.4+0.7 pts
24Lubelski56.2+0.7 pts
25Sieradzki56.1+0.8 pts
25Żyrardowski56.1+0.8 pts
27Słupski56+1 pts
28Bialski55.9+1 pts
29Białostocki55.7+1 pts
29Bydgosko-toruński55.7+0.7 pts
29Gliwicki55.7+1.1 pts
29Krośnieński55.7+0.8 pts
33Włocławski55.5+1 pts
33Zielonogórski55.5+1 pts
35Tarnobrzeski55.4+1 pts
36Katowicki55.2+0.7 pts
36Świecki55.2+0.7 pts
38Chojnicki55.1+0.5 pts
39Kaliski54.9+0.7 pts
39Ostrołęcki54.9+0.7 pts
39Rybnicki54.9+0.6 pts
42Bytomski54.8+0.8 pts
42Płocki54.8+0.7 pts
42Tyski54.8+0.8 pts
45Elbląski54.7+1 pts
45Inowrocławski54.7+0.8 pts
45Opolski54.7+1.1 pts
45Przemyski54.7+0.8 pts
49Grudziądzki54.6+0.7 pts
50Ciechanowski54.5+0.9 pts
50Tarnowski54.5+0.6 pts
52Koniński54.4+0.6 pts
53Leszczyński54.3+0.5 pts
53Nowosądecki54.3+0.5 pts
55Olsztyński54.2+1 pts
55Pilski54.2+0.7 pts
55Rzeszowski54.2+0.5 pts
55Szczeciński54.2+1.1 pts
59Gorzowski54.1+0.7 pts
59Suwalski54.1+1.1 pts
61Warszawski zachodni53.9-0.1 pts
62Ełcki53.8+1 pts
62Krakowski53.8+0.4 pts
62Warszawski wschodni53.80 pts
65Nowotarski53.7+0.5 pts
66Wrocławski53.5+0.5 pts
67Starogardzki53.4+0.5 pts
68Miasto Poznań53+0.4 pts
68Miasto Warszawa53-0.1 pts
70Gdański52+0.2 pts
70Miasto Wrocław52+0.5 pts
72Poznański51.9+0.2 pts
73Miasto Kraków51.5+0.5 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Population aged 0 to 14 plus population aged 65 and over, divided by population aged 15 to 64, times 100, on 1 January (Eurostat).

Eurostat age bands. dependency_ratio (INE, Spain) splits the ages at 16, so values for Spanish places differ between the two.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"dependency_ratio_15_64","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=dependency_ratio_15_64&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Łódź, with 61.1% in 2024, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Kraków, with 51.5% in 2024.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base): other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings