Data / Rankings / Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) / NUTS 3 areas of Poland

NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)

Miasto Warszawa had the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) of 73 areas in 2020, at 58%. Olsztyński had the lowest, at 47.3%. The median was 49.7% and the figure for Poland was 50.8%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.

Highest58Miasto Warszawa
Lowest47.3Olsztyński
Median49.773 areas
Poland50.8History

Top 40 areas, 2020

CSVChart (SVG)

Miasto WarszawaMiasto Warszawa: 58 %58Miasto ŁódźMiasto Łódź: 57.7 %57.7TrójmiejskiTrójmiejski: 56.6 %56.6Miasto PoznańMiasto Poznań: 55.8 %55.8Miasto WrocławMiasto Wrocław: 55.3 %55.3Miasto KrakówMiasto Kraków: 53.8 %53.8Miasto SzczecinMiasto Szczecin: 53.6 %53.6SosnowieckiSosnowiecki: 52.8 %52.8Warszawski zachodniWarszawski zachodni: 52.5 %52.5ŁódzkiŁódzki: 52.2 %52.2KatowickiKatowicki: 52.1 %52.1BielskiBielski: 52 %52SiedleckiSiedlecki: 52 %52SkierniewickiSkierniewicki: 51.8 %51.8PuławskiPuławski: 51.7 %51.7Warszawski wschodniWarszawski wschodni: 51.6 %51.6ŻyrardowskiŻyrardowski: 51.5 %51.5GliwickiGliwicki: 51.1 %51.1WałbrzyskiWałbrzyski: 51.1 %51.1Bydgosko-toruńskiBydgosko-toruński: 51 %51Legnicko-głogowskiLegnicko-głogowski: 51 %51LubelskiLubelski: 51 %51KieleckiKielecki: 50.9 %50.9CzęstochowskiCzęstochowski: 50.8 %50.8BytomskiBytomski: 50.7 %50.7PiotrkowskiPiotrkowski: 50.7 %50.7Sandomiersko-jędrzejowskiSandomiersko-jędrzejowski: 50.7 %50.7RybnickiRybnicki: 50.5 %50.5KoszalińskiKoszaliński: 50.4 %50.4ŁomżyńskiŁomżyński: 50.4 %50.4OświęcimskiOświęcimski: 50.2 %50.2OpolskiOpolski: 50.1 %50.1ChojnickiChojnicki: 50 %50KaliskiKaliski: 49.9 %49.9SieradzkiSieradzki: 49.9 %49.9LeszczyńskiLeszczyński: 49.7 %49.7PłockiPłocki: 49.7 %49.7RadomskiRadomski: 49.6 %49.6SłupskiSłupski: 49.6 %49.6ZielonogórskiZielonogórski: 49.6 %49.6
%. Source: Eurostat. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Full ranking

RankAreas2020 (%)Change on 2019
1Miasto Warszawa58+1.5 pts
2Miasto Łódź57.7+2 pts
3Trójmiejski56.6+1.7 pts
4Miasto Poznań55.8+1.9 pts
5Miasto Wrocław55.3+2 pts
6Miasto Kraków53.8+1.3 pts
7Miasto Szczecin53.6+1.7 pts
8Sosnowiecki52.8+2.1 pts
9Warszawski zachodni52.5+1.3 pts
10Łódzki52.2+1.4 pts
11Katowicki52.1+1.6 pts
12Bielski52+1.5 pts
12Siedlecki52+1.5 pts
14Skierniewicki51.8+1.4 pts
15Puławski51.7+1.3 pts
16Warszawski wschodni51.6+1.3 pts
17Żyrardowski51.5+1.5 pts
18Gliwicki51.1+1.7 pts
18Wałbrzyski51.1+1.8 pts
20Bydgosko-toruński51+1.6 pts
20Legnicko-głogowski51+1.8 pts
20Lubelski51+1.4 pts
23Kielecki50.9+1.6 pts
24Częstochowski50.8+1.5 pts
25Bytomski50.7+1.4 pts
25Piotrkowski50.7+1.4 pts
25Sandomiersko-jędrzejowski50.7+1.3 pts
28Rybnicki50.5+1.3 pts
29Koszaliński50.4+1.8 pts
29Łomżyński50.4+1.2 pts
31Oświęcimski50.2+1.4 pts
32Opolski50.1+1.7 pts
33Chojnicki50+1.5 pts
34Kaliski49.9+1.3 pts
34Sieradzki49.9+1.1 pts
36Leszczyński49.7+1.3 pts
36Płocki49.7+1.5 pts
38Radomski49.6+1.5 pts
38Słupski49.6+1.6 pts
38Zielonogórski49.6+1.5 pts
41Jeleniogórski49.5+1.7 pts
41Tyski49.5+1.7 pts
43Bialski49.4+1.2 pts
44Gdański49.3+1.2 pts
45Gorzowski49.2+1.3 pts
45Grudziądzki49.2+1.3 pts
45Poznański49.2+1.2 pts
45Wrocławski49.2+1.5 pts
49Białostocki49.1+1.5 pts
49Chełmsko-zamojski49.1+1.2 pts
49Nyski49.1+1.5 pts
52Koniński49+1.3 pts
53Krakowski48.9+1.1 pts
53Nowotarski48.9+1 pts
55Nowosądecki48.8+0.8 pts
56Ostrołęcki48.7+1.2 pts
56Rzeszowski48.7+1.1 pts
56Włocławski48.7+1.2 pts
59Szczecinecko-pyrzycki48.6+1.4 pts
60Świecki48.5+1.4 pts
61Ciechanowski48.4+1.3 pts
61Krośnieński48.4+1.1 pts
63Starogardzki48.2+1.4 pts
64Elbląski48.1+1.5 pts
64Pilski48.1+1.3 pts
64Tarnowski48.1+1 pts
67Tarnobrzeski47.8+1.4 pts
68Inowrocławski47.7+1.3 pts
69Szczeciński47.6+1.6 pts
70Suwalski47.5+1 pts
71Przemyski47.4+1.2 pts
72Ełcki47.3+1.3 pts
72Olsztyński47.3+1.4 pts

Other periods

About this ranking

Population aged 0 to 14 plus population aged 65 and over, divided by population aged 15 to 64, times 100, on 1 January (Eurostat).

Eurostat age bands. dependency_ratio (INE, Spain) splits the ages at 16, so values for Spanish places differ between the two.

Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.

How to cite

Eurostat. Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/demo_r_pjanind3/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Use this data in your AI agent

Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:

Rank NUTS 3 areas of Poland by age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"dependency_ratio_15_64","level":"province","within":"Poland","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=dependency_ratio_15_64&level=province&within=Poland&limit=10

Connect Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor in one step. The trial answers 25 calls a day without an account.

Questions

Which area has the highest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Miasto Warszawa, with 58% in 2020, according to Eurostat, European Commission.

Which area has the lowest age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base)?

Olsztyński, with 47.3% in 2020.

Where does this ranking come from?

Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, Population structure indicators by NUTS 2 and 3 region, age dependency ratio (demo_r_pjanind3). Retrieved 2026-10-09.

Age dependency ratio (ages 15 to 64 base): other rankings

NUTS 3 areas of Poland: more rankings