NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2022, at 192%. Sud Sardegna had the lowest, at 52%. The median was 86% and the figure for Italy was 98%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2022
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2022 (%) | Change on 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 192 | +3 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 161 | +8 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 135 | +3 pts |
| 4 | Modena | 130 | +1 pts |
| 4 | Roma | 130 | +7 pts |
| 6 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 127 | +8 pts |
| 7 | Firenze | 126 | +5 pts |
| 7 | Trento | 126 | +5 pts |
| 9 | Parma | 124 | -5 pts |
| 10 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 121 | +2 pts |
| 11 | Brescia | 117 | +3 pts |
| 12 | Vicenza | 116 | +2 pts |
| 13 | Padova | 113 | +1 pts |
| 13 | Trieste | 113 | -5 pts |
| 15 | Bergamo | 112 | 0 pts |
| 15 | Verona | 112 | +3 pts |
| 17 | Genova | 110 | +2 pts |
| 17 | Treviso | 110 | 0 pts |
| 19 | Belluno | 108 | +4 pts |
| 19 | Cremona | 108 | 0 pts |
| 19 | Cuneo | 108 | +4 pts |
| 19 | Piacenza | 108 | -1 pts |
| 23 | Forlì-Cesena | 107 | 0 pts |
| 24 | La Spezia | 105 | +1 pts |
| 24 | Lecco | 105 | +1 pts |
| 24 | Mantova | 105 | +2 pts |
| 27 | Monza e della Brianza | 104 | 0 pts |
| 27 | Udine | 104 | +2 pts |
| 29 | Pisa | 103 | +2 pts |
| 29 | Ravenna | 103 | +1 pts |
| 29 | Torino | 103 | 0 pts |
| 29 | Venezia | 103 | +6 pts |
| 33 | Pordenone | 101 | -1 pts |
| 34 | Novara | 100 | 0 pts |
| 34 | Prato | 100 | +3 pts |
| 34 | Siena | 100 | +1 pts |
| 37 | Arezzo | 99 | +5 pts |
| 37 | Varese | 99 | +4 pts |
| 39 | Rimini | 98 | +3 pts |
| 40 | Sondrio | 97 | +3 pts |
| 41 | Ancona | 96 | 0 pts |
| 41 | Lucca | 96 | +4 pts |
| 41 | Savona | 96 | +5 pts |
| 44 | Como | 94 | +2 pts |
| 44 | Vercelli | 94 | +1 pts |
| 46 | Alessandria | 93 | 0 pts |
| 46 | Cagliari | 93 | +5 pts |
| 48 | Gorizia | 92 | +1 pts |
| 48 | Pesaro e Urbino | 92 | +1 pts |
| 50 | Livorno | 90 | +2 pts |
| 51 | Biella | 89 | +2 pts |
| 51 | Macerata | 89 | +3 pts |
| 53 | Lodi | 88 | -2 pts |
| 54 | Perugia | 86 | +3 pts |
| 55 | Chieti | 85 | +1 pts |
| 55 | Massa-Carrara | 85 | +2 pts |
| 55 | Pavia | 85 | +3 pts |
| 55 | Rovigo | 85 | 0 pts |
| 59 | Ascoli Piceno | 84 | +2 pts |
| 59 | L’Aquila | 84 | +4 pts |
| 59 | Siracusa | 84 | +20 pts |
| 62 | Asti | 83 | 0 pts |
| 62 | Ferrara | 83 | -3 pts |
| 62 | Pistoia | 83 | +1 pts |
| 65 | Grosseto | 82 | 0 pts |
| 66 | Teramo | 81 | +2 pts |
| 67 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 80 | +2 pts |
| 68 | Fermo | 79 | +3 pts |
| 68 | Pescara | 79 | 0 pts |
| 68 | Potenza | 79 | +1 pts |
| 71 | Imperia | 78 | +1 pts |
| 72 | Terni | 75 | -2 pts |
| 73 | Bari | 74 | +2 pts |
| 73 | Campobasso | 74 | +1 pts |
| 73 | Latina | 74 | -1 pts |
| 76 | Frosinone | 73 | 0 pts |
| 77 | Sassari | 72 | +2 pts |
| 78 | Rieti | 70 | -1 pts |
| 78 | Viterbo | 70 | +1 pts |
| 80 | Isernia | 69 | +2 pts |
| 81 | Matera | 67 | +2 pts |
| 82 | Catanzaro | 65 | +1 pts |
| 82 | Napoli | 65 | +2 pts |
| 84 | Nuoro | 64 | +1 pts |
| 84 | Salerno | 64 | +2 pts |
| 86 | Palermo | 63 | +1 pts |
| 86 | Taranto | 63 | +1 pts |
| 88 | Avellino | 62 | +2 pts |
| 89 | Catania | 61 | +1 pts |
| 90 | Messina | 60 | +1 pts |
| 90 | Ragusa | 60 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Brindisi | 59 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Foggia | 59 | +2 pts |
| 92 | Oristano | 59 | +2 pts |
| 92 | Reggio Calabria | 59 | +1 pts |
| 96 | Benevento | 58 | +2 pts |
| 96 | Caserta | 58 | +2 pts |
| 96 | Crotone | 58 | +1 pts |
| 96 | Lecce | 58 | +1 pts |
| 100 | Caltanissetta | 54 | 0 pts |
| 100 | Trapani | 54 | +1 pts |
| 102 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 53 | 0 pts |
| 102 | Cosenza | 53 | +1 pts |
| 102 | Enna | 53 | +2 pts |
| 102 | Vibo Valentia | 53 | 0 pts |
| 106 | Agrigento | 52 | +1 pts |
| 106 | Sud Sardegna | 52 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 192% in 2022, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Sud Sardegna, with 52% in 2022.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)