NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2012, at 199%. Sud Sardegna had the lowest, at 55%. The median was 94% and the figure for Italy was 103%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2012
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2012 (%) | Change on 2011 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 199 | -5 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 164 | +6 pts |
| 3 | Roma | 146 | -6 pts |
| 4 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 145 | +1 pts |
| 5 | Bologna | 142 | -4 pts |
| 6 | Firenze | 134 | +1 pts |
| 7 | Trento | 133 | 0 pts |
| 8 | Parma | 132 | 0 pts |
| 9 | Modena | 129 | 0 pts |
| 10 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 121 | -4 pts |
| 11 | Bergamo | 119 | -3 pts |
| 11 | Brescia | 119 | -2 pts |
| 11 | Genova | 119 | -1 pts |
| 11 | Padova | 119 | -2 pts |
| 11 | Verona | 119 | 0 pts |
| 16 | Siena | 118 | +4 pts |
| 16 | Trieste | 118 | 0 pts |
| 18 | Vicenza | 117 | -1 pts |
| 19 | Piacenza | 113 | -1 pts |
| 19 | Ravenna | 113 | -5 pts |
| 21 | Forlì-Cesena | 112 | -3 pts |
| 21 | Monza e della Brianza | 112 | -2 pts |
| 21 | Sondrio | 112 | -2 pts |
| 21 | Treviso | 112 | -4 pts |
| 21 | Varese | 112 | 0 pts |
| 26 | Cuneo | 110 | -3 pts |
| 26 | La Spezia | 110 | 0 pts |
| 28 | Lecco | 109 | -1 pts |
| 28 | Mantova | 109 | -2 pts |
| 28 | Rimini | 109 | -2 pts |
| 28 | Torino | 109 | -5 pts |
| 28 | Venezia | 109 | -3 pts |
| 33 | Belluno | 108 | -1 pts |
| 33 | Cremona | 108 | 0 pts |
| 33 | Pisa | 108 | -3 pts |
| 33 | Pordenone | 108 | -4 pts |
| 37 | Prato | 107 | -3 pts |
| 38 | Ancona | 105 | -2 pts |
| 38 | Udine | 105 | -4 pts |
| 40 | Como | 103 | -6 pts |
| 41 | Savona | 102 | -3 pts |
| 42 | Novara | 101 | -1 pts |
| 43 | Arezzo | 100 | 0 pts |
| 43 | Cagliari | 100 | +2 pts |
| 43 | Lucca | 100 | -2 pts |
| 46 | Alessandria | 99 | -3 pts |
| 47 | Vercelli | 98 | -3 pts |
| 48 | Livorno | 97 | -1 pts |
| 48 | Lodi | 97 | -2 pts |
| 50 | Biella | 95 | -5 pts |
| 50 | Gorizia | 95 | -5 pts |
| 50 | Pescara | 95 | +1 pts |
| 50 | Pistoia | 95 | 0 pts |
| 54 | L’Aquila | 94 | +4 pts |
| 54 | Perugia | 94 | -2 pts |
| 54 | Pesaro e Urbino | 94 | -3 pts |
| 57 | Ferrara | 93 | -1 pts |
| 58 | Chieti | 91 | -2 pts |
| 58 | Fermo | 91 | +1 pts |
| 58 | Macerata | 91 | -2 pts |
| 58 | Rovigo | 91 | -3 pts |
| 62 | Asti | 90 | -2 pts |
| 63 | Grosseto | 89 | -2 pts |
| 63 | Massa-Carrara | 89 | +2 pts |
| 65 | Pavia | 88 | -4 pts |
| 65 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 88 | 0 pts |
| 67 | Ascoli Piceno | 87 | -3 pts |
| 67 | Imperia | 87 | -2 pts |
| 69 | Teramo | 86 | -2 pts |
| 70 | Latina | 84 | 0 pts |
| 70 | Terni | 84 | -5 pts |
| 72 | Campobasso | 81 | -2 pts |
| 72 | Frosinone | 81 | -3 pts |
| 74 | Sassari | 79 | 0 pts |
| 74 | Viterbo | 79 | -2 pts |
| 76 | Potenza | 78 | +1 pts |
| 77 | Bari | 77 | 0 pts |
| 78 | Isernia | 76 | -4 pts |
| 78 | Ragusa | 76 | +3 pts |
| 80 | Catanzaro | 74 | -1 pts |
| 80 | Rieti | 74 | +1 pts |
| 82 | Napoli | 70 | 0 pts |
| 83 | Siracusa | 69 | +1 pts |
| 84 | Nuoro | 68 | 0 pts |
| 84 | Palermo | 68 | -1 pts |
| 84 | Taranto | 68 | 0 pts |
| 87 | Catania | 67 | -1 pts |
| 87 | Salerno | 67 | +1 pts |
| 89 | Matera | 66 | -3 pts |
| 89 | Messina | 66 | 0 pts |
| 91 | Crotone | 65 | -2 pts |
| 92 | Avellino | 64 | -4 pts |
| 92 | Brindisi | 64 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Reggio Calabria | 64 | 0 pts |
| 95 | Foggia | 63 | +2 pts |
| 96 | Benevento | 62 | 0 pts |
| 96 | Oristano | 62 | +1 pts |
| 98 | Caserta | 60 | +1 pts |
| 99 | Caltanissetta | 59 | -1 pts |
| 99 | Cosenza | 59 | -1 pts |
| 99 | Lecce | 59 | 0 pts |
| 99 | Trapani | 59 | -1 pts |
| 103 | Vibo Valentia | 58 | -2 pts |
| 104 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 57 | 0 pts |
| 105 | Agrigento | 56 | +1 pts |
| 106 | Enna | 55 | 0 pts |
| 106 | Sud Sardegna | 55 | -1 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 199% in 2012, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Sud Sardegna, with 55% in 2012.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)