NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)
Milano had the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) of 107 areas in 2021, at 189%. Enna had the lowest, at 51%. The median was 86% and the figure for Italy was 96%. Source: Eurostat, European Commission.
Top 40 areas, 2021
Full ranking
| Rank | Areas | 2021 (%) | Change on 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Milano | 189 | +10 pts |
| 2 | Bolzano-Bozen | 153 | +2 pts |
| 3 | Bologna | 132 | +2 pts |
| 4 | Modena | 129 | +9 pts |
| 4 | Parma | 129 | +6 pts |
| 6 | Roma | 123 | -1 pts |
| 7 | Firenze | 121 | +6 pts |
| 7 | Trento | 121 | +1 pts |
| 9 | Reggio nell’Emilia | 119 | +3 pts |
| 9 | Valle d’Aosta/Vallée d’Aoste | 119 | +1 pts |
| 11 | Trieste | 118 | +8 pts |
| 12 | Brescia | 114 | +5 pts |
| 12 | Vicenza | 114 | +3 pts |
| 14 | Bergamo | 112 | +4 pts |
| 14 | Padova | 112 | +3 pts |
| 16 | Treviso | 110 | +3 pts |
| 17 | Piacenza | 109 | +2 pts |
| 17 | Verona | 109 | +1 pts |
| 19 | Cremona | 108 | +2 pts |
| 19 | Genova | 108 | +2 pts |
| 21 | Forlì-Cesena | 107 | +3 pts |
| 22 | Belluno | 104 | +5 pts |
| 22 | Cuneo | 104 | -1 pts |
| 22 | La Spezia | 104 | +4 pts |
| 22 | Lecco | 104 | +3 pts |
| 22 | Monza e della Brianza | 104 | +2 pts |
| 27 | Mantova | 103 | +1 pts |
| 27 | Torino | 103 | +4 pts |
| 29 | Pordenone | 102 | +1 pts |
| 29 | Ravenna | 102 | +1 pts |
| 29 | Udine | 102 | +3 pts |
| 32 | Pisa | 101 | +1 pts |
| 33 | Novara | 100 | +3 pts |
| 34 | Siena | 99 | 0 pts |
| 35 | Prato | 97 | +2 pts |
| 35 | Venezia | 97 | +4 pts |
| 37 | Ancona | 96 | +1 pts |
| 38 | Rimini | 95 | +4 pts |
| 38 | Varese | 95 | +1 pts |
| 40 | Arezzo | 94 | +5 pts |
| 40 | Sondrio | 94 | -1 pts |
| 42 | Alessandria | 93 | +4 pts |
| 42 | Vercelli | 93 | +1 pts |
| 44 | Como | 92 | +3 pts |
| 44 | Lucca | 92 | +1 pts |
| 46 | Gorizia | 91 | +3 pts |
| 46 | Pesaro e Urbino | 91 | +4 pts |
| 46 | Savona | 91 | +2 pts |
| 49 | Lodi | 90 | +2 pts |
| 50 | Cagliari | 88 | +1 pts |
| 50 | Livorno | 88 | +4 pts |
| 52 | Biella | 87 | +3 pts |
| 53 | Ferrara | 86 | +3 pts |
| 53 | Macerata | 86 | +3 pts |
| 55 | Rovigo | 85 | +1 pts |
| 56 | Chieti | 84 | +2 pts |
| 57 | Asti | 83 | +1 pts |
| 57 | Massa-Carrara | 83 | +1 pts |
| 57 | Perugia | 83 | +1 pts |
| 60 | Ascoli Piceno | 82 | -1 pts |
| 60 | Grosseto | 82 | +1 pts |
| 60 | Pavia | 82 | +3 pts |
| 60 | Pistoia | 82 | -1 pts |
| 64 | L’Aquila | 80 | 0 pts |
| 65 | Pescara | 79 | +2 pts |
| 65 | Teramo | 79 | +4 pts |
| 67 | Potenza | 78 | +7 pts |
| 67 | Verbano-Cusio-Ossola | 78 | +3 pts |
| 69 | Imperia | 77 | +1 pts |
| 69 | Terni | 77 | +4 pts |
| 71 | Fermo | 76 | +3 pts |
| 72 | Latina | 75 | 0 pts |
| 73 | Campobasso | 73 | +3 pts |
| 73 | Frosinone | 73 | +2 pts |
| 75 | Bari | 72 | +1 pts |
| 76 | Rieti | 71 | +3 pts |
| 77 | Sassari | 70 | +3 pts |
| 78 | Viterbo | 69 | +1 pts |
| 79 | Isernia | 67 | 0 pts |
| 80 | Matera | 65 | +2 pts |
| 81 | Catanzaro | 64 | +1 pts |
| 81 | Siracusa | 64 | +7 pts |
| 83 | Napoli | 63 | +1 pts |
| 83 | Nuoro | 63 | +1 pts |
| 85 | Palermo | 62 | +2 pts |
| 85 | Salerno | 62 | +2 pts |
| 85 | Taranto | 62 | +3 pts |
| 88 | Avellino | 60 | +2 pts |
| 88 | Catania | 60 | +1 pts |
| 90 | Messina | 59 | 0 pts |
| 90 | Ragusa | 59 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Brindisi | 58 | +1 pts |
| 92 | Reggio Calabria | 58 | +1 pts |
| 94 | Crotone | 57 | +3 pts |
| 94 | Foggia | 57 | +1 pts |
| 94 | Lecce | 57 | +2 pts |
| 94 | Oristano | 57 | +1 pts |
| 98 | Benevento | 56 | +1 pts |
| 98 | Caserta | 56 | 0 pts |
| 100 | Caltanissetta | 54 | +2 pts |
| 101 | Barletta-Andria-Trani | 53 | +2 pts |
| 101 | Trapani | 53 | +1 pts |
| 101 | Vibo Valentia | 53 | +1 pts |
| 104 | Cosenza | 52 | +1 pts |
| 104 | Sud Sardegna | 52 | +1 pts |
| 106 | Agrigento | 51 | +1 pts |
| 106 | Enna | 51 | 0 pts |
Other periods
About this ranking
GDP per inhabitant in purchasing power standards as a percentage of the EU27 average.
Every value in the ranking comes from the same publisher and the same period, so the areas are compared on one definition. Equal values share a rank.
How to cite
Eurostat. GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10r_3gdp/default/table. Retrieved 2026-10-08.
Use this data in your AI agent
Invokely serves this figure to AI assistants through MCP and to code through a REST API, with the source and citation attached. Ask your assistant:
Rank NUTS 3 areas of Italy by GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100) using official data, and cite the source.
rank_places {"indicator":"gdp_per_capita_pps","level":"province","within":"Italy","limit":10}
GET https://invokely.ai/api/v1/rank?indicator=gdp_per_capita_pps&level=province&within=Italy&limit=10
Questions
Which area has the highest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Milano, with 189% in 2021, according to Eurostat, European Commission.
Which area has the lowest GDP per capita in purchasing power (EU = 100)?
Enna, with 51% in 2021.
Where does this ranking come from?
Every value comes from one source and one period, so the places are comparable: Eurostat, European Commission, GDP per inhabitant in PPS, EU27 = 100, by NUTS 3 region (nama_10r_3gdp). Retrieved 2026-10-08.
GDP per capita in PPS (EU27 = 100): other rankings
- EU countries
- EU regions (NUTS 2)
- Autonomous communities of Spain
- Provinces of Spain
- Regions of Germany (NUTS 2)
- Regions of France (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Italy (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Poland (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Greece (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Netherlands (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Belgium (NUTS 2)
- Regions of Austria (NUTS 2)